Implementation and Evaluation of Preimplantation Genetic Testing at Vilnius University Hospital Santaros Klinikos.

assisted reproductive technology fertility in vitro fertilization preimplantation genetic testing

Journal

Acta medica Lituanica
ISSN: 1392-0138
Titre abrégé: Acta Med Litu
Pays: Lithuania
ID NLM: 9442465

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2022
Historique:
received: 07 04 2022
revised: 11 07 2022
accepted: 10 08 2022
medline: 1 1 2022
pubmed: 1 1 2022
entrez: 21 9 2023
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

The most effective treatment of infertility is in vitro fertilization (IVF). IVF with Preimplantation Genetic Testing (PGT) allows to identify embryos with a genetic abnormality associated with a specific medical disorder and to select the most optimal embryos for the transfer. PGT is divided into structural rearrangement testing (PGT-SR), monogenetic disorder testing (PGT-M), and aneuploidy testing (PGT-A). This study mostly analyzes PGT-SR, also describes a few cases of PGT-M. The aim of this study was to implement PGT procedure at Vilnius University Hospital Santaros Klinikos (VUHSK) Santaros Fertility Centre (SFC) and to perform retrospective analysis of PGT procedures after the implementation. A single-center retrospective analysis was carried out. The study population included infertile couples who underwent PGT at SFC, VUHSK from January 01st, 2017 to December 31st, 2020. Ion PGM platform (Life Technologies, USA) and Ion ReproSeq PGS View Kit (Life Technologies, USA) were used for the whole genome amplification. Results were assessed using descriptive statistics. PGT was successfully implemented in VUHSK in 2017. During the analyzed time period, thirty-four PGT procedures were performed for 26 couples. Two procedures were performed in 2017, 7 procedures - in 2018, 13 - in 2019, and 12 - in 2020. In comparison with all IVF procedures, 2.5% procedures were IVF with PGT, a highest percentage was in 2020 (3.8% of all procedures). The main indication for PGT was balanced chromosomal rearrangements (in 85.3% cases). In all 34 cases 515 oocytes were aspirated in total, 309 oocytes were fertilized, oocytes fertilization rate exceeded 60%. A normal diploid karyotype was found in 46 (16.8%) biopsied embryos. Out of all PGT procedures, 9 (26.5%) resulted in a clinical pregnancy. Six (66.7%) pregnancies were confirmed in 2019, and 3 (33.3%) - in 2020. Three (33.3%) pregnancies resulted in spontaneous abortion, 6 (66.7%) - in delivery. The implementation of PGT in VUHSK was successful. The most common indication for PGT was a reciprocal translocation. Oocytes fertilization rate exceeded 60%, a normal karyotype was found less than in one-fifth of biopsied embryos. A highest clinical pregnancy rate was achieved in 2019 when almost half of women conceived, which is probably related to the experience gained by the multidisciplinary team. This is the first study analyzing IVF with PGT in Lithuania, however, the results should be interpreted with caution due to a low number of total procedures performed. Efektyviausias nevaisingumo gydymo būdas – pagalbinio apvaisinimo (PA) procedūra. PA su preimplantaciniu genetiniu tyrimu (PGT) leidžia identifikuoti genetiškai pakitusius embrionus ir atrinkti tinkamiausius embrionus įkelti į gimdą. Šio tyrimo tikslas – įdiegti PGT į klinikinę praktiką Vilniaus universiteto ligoninės Santaros klinikų (VULSK) Santaros vaisingumo centre (SVC) ir atlikti PGT procedūrų retrospektyvinę analizę po įdiegimo. Atlikta retrospektyvinė analizė, į tyrimą įtrauktos VULSK nuo 2017 m. sausio 1 d. iki 2020 m. gruodžio 31 d. gydytos nevaisingos poros, kurioms taikytas PGT. Ion PGM platforma (Life Technologies, USA) ir Ion ReproSeq PGS View Kit (Life Technologies, USA) buvo naudota atlikti viso genomo sekvenavimą. Rezultatai įvertinti aprašomosios statistikos metodais. PGT įdiegtas į klinikinę praktiką VULSK SFC 2017 metais. Buvo atliktos 34 PGT procedūros 26 poroms. Dvi procedūros atliktos 2017 m., 7 procedūros – 2018 m., 13 procedūrų – 2019 m., 12 – 2020 m. PGT sudarė 2,5 % visų PA procedūrų, didžiausias procentas, palyginti su visomis PA procedūromis, pasiektas 2020 metais (3,8 %). Dažniausia indikacija atlikti PGT – subalansuotas chromosomų persitvarkymas (85,3 % atvejų). Kiaušialąsčių apsivaisinimo dažnis siekė 60 %. Normalus diploidinis kariotipas rastas 16,8 % embrionų, kuriems atlikta biopsija. Iš visų PGT procedūrų 9 (26,5 %) procedūros baigėsi klinikiniu nėštumu. Šeši (66,7 %) nėštumai patvirtinti 2019 m., 3 (33,3 %) – 2020 metais. Trys (33,3 %) nėštumai baigėsi savaiminiu persileidimu, 6 (66,7 %) – gimdymu. PGT sėkmingai įdiegtas į klinikinę praktiką VULSK. Dažniausia indikacija atlikti PGT – subalansuotas chromosomų persitvarkymas – reciprokinė translokacija. Kiaušialąsčių apsivaisinimo dažnis siekė 60 %, normalus diploidinis kariotipas nustatytas mažiau nei pektadaliui embrionų. Didžiausias klinikinių nėštumų dažnis pasiektas 2019 metais, tada beveik pusė moterų pastojo. Du trečdaliai nėštumų baigėsi gimdymu. Šiame tyrime, pirmajame Lietuvoje, apžvelgiamos PA procedūros su PGT, tačiau tyrimo rezultatai turėtų būti interpretuojami atsargiai, atsižvelgiant į mažą atliktų procedūrų skaičių.

Sections du résumé

Background and Objectives UNASSIGNED
The most effective treatment of infertility is in vitro fertilization (IVF). IVF with Preimplantation Genetic Testing (PGT) allows to identify embryos with a genetic abnormality associated with a specific medical disorder and to select the most optimal embryos for the transfer. PGT is divided into structural rearrangement testing (PGT-SR), monogenetic disorder testing (PGT-M), and aneuploidy testing (PGT-A). This study mostly analyzes PGT-SR, also describes a few cases of PGT-M. The aim of this study was to implement PGT procedure at Vilnius University Hospital Santaros Klinikos (VUHSK) Santaros Fertility Centre (SFC) and to perform retrospective analysis of PGT procedures after the implementation.
Materials and Methods UNASSIGNED
A single-center retrospective analysis was carried out. The study population included infertile couples who underwent PGT at SFC, VUHSK from January 01st, 2017 to December 31st, 2020. Ion PGM platform (Life Technologies, USA) and Ion ReproSeq PGS View Kit (Life Technologies, USA) were used for the whole genome amplification. Results were assessed using descriptive statistics.
Results UNASSIGNED
PGT was successfully implemented in VUHSK in 2017. During the analyzed time period, thirty-four PGT procedures were performed for 26 couples. Two procedures were performed in 2017, 7 procedures - in 2018, 13 - in 2019, and 12 - in 2020. In comparison with all IVF procedures, 2.5% procedures were IVF with PGT, a highest percentage was in 2020 (3.8% of all procedures). The main indication for PGT was balanced chromosomal rearrangements (in 85.3% cases). In all 34 cases 515 oocytes were aspirated in total, 309 oocytes were fertilized, oocytes fertilization rate exceeded 60%. A normal diploid karyotype was found in 46 (16.8%) biopsied embryos. Out of all PGT procedures, 9 (26.5%) resulted in a clinical pregnancy. Six (66.7%) pregnancies were confirmed in 2019, and 3 (33.3%) - in 2020. Three (33.3%) pregnancies resulted in spontaneous abortion, 6 (66.7%) - in delivery.
Conclusions UNASSIGNED
The implementation of PGT in VUHSK was successful. The most common indication for PGT was a reciprocal translocation. Oocytes fertilization rate exceeded 60%, a normal karyotype was found less than in one-fifth of biopsied embryos. A highest clinical pregnancy rate was achieved in 2019 when almost half of women conceived, which is probably related to the experience gained by the multidisciplinary team. This is the first study analyzing IVF with PGT in Lithuania, however, the results should be interpreted with caution due to a low number of total procedures performed.
Įvadas UNASSIGNED
Efektyviausias nevaisingumo gydymo būdas – pagalbinio apvaisinimo (PA) procedūra. PA su preimplantaciniu genetiniu tyrimu (PGT) leidžia identifikuoti genetiškai pakitusius embrionus ir atrinkti tinkamiausius embrionus įkelti į gimdą. Šio tyrimo tikslas – įdiegti PGT į klinikinę praktiką Vilniaus universiteto ligoninės Santaros klinikų (VULSK) Santaros vaisingumo centre (SVC) ir atlikti PGT procedūrų retrospektyvinę analizę po įdiegimo.
Metodika UNASSIGNED
Atlikta retrospektyvinė analizė, į tyrimą įtrauktos VULSK nuo 2017 m. sausio 1 d. iki 2020 m. gruodžio 31 d. gydytos nevaisingos poros, kurioms taikytas PGT. Ion PGM platforma (Life Technologies, USA) ir Ion ReproSeq PGS View Kit (Life Technologies, USA) buvo naudota atlikti viso genomo sekvenavimą. Rezultatai įvertinti aprašomosios statistikos metodais.
Rezultatai UNASSIGNED
PGT įdiegtas į klinikinę praktiką VULSK SFC 2017 metais. Buvo atliktos 34 PGT procedūros 26 poroms. Dvi procedūros atliktos 2017 m., 7 procedūros – 2018 m., 13 procedūrų – 2019 m., 12 – 2020 m. PGT sudarė 2,5 % visų PA procedūrų, didžiausias procentas, palyginti su visomis PA procedūromis, pasiektas 2020 metais (3,8 %). Dažniausia indikacija atlikti PGT – subalansuotas chromosomų persitvarkymas (85,3 % atvejų). Kiaušialąsčių apsivaisinimo dažnis siekė 60 %. Normalus diploidinis kariotipas rastas 16,8 % embrionų, kuriems atlikta biopsija. Iš visų PGT procedūrų 9 (26,5 %) procedūros baigėsi klinikiniu nėštumu. Šeši (66,7 %) nėštumai patvirtinti 2019 m., 3 (33,3 %) – 2020 metais. Trys (33,3 %) nėštumai baigėsi savaiminiu persileidimu, 6 (66,7 %) – gimdymu.
Išvados UNASSIGNED
PGT sėkmingai įdiegtas į klinikinę praktiką VULSK. Dažniausia indikacija atlikti PGT – subalansuotas chromosomų persitvarkymas – reciprokinė translokacija. Kiaušialąsčių apsivaisinimo dažnis siekė 60 %, normalus diploidinis kariotipas nustatytas mažiau nei pektadaliui embrionų. Didžiausias klinikinių nėštumų dažnis pasiektas 2019 metais, tada beveik pusė moterų pastojo. Du trečdaliai nėštumų baigėsi gimdymu. Šiame tyrime, pirmajame Lietuvoje, apžvelgiamos PA procedūros su PGT, tačiau tyrimo rezultatai turėtų būti interpretuojami atsargiai, atsižvelgiant į mažą atliktų procedūrų skaičių.

Autres résumés

Type: Publisher (lit)
Efektyviausias nevaisingumo gydymo būdas – pagalbinio apvaisinimo (PA) procedūra. PA su preimplantaciniu genetiniu tyrimu (PGT) leidžia identifikuoti genetiškai pakitusius embrionus ir atrinkti tinkamiausius embrionus įkelti į gimdą. Šio tyrimo tikslas – įdiegti PGT į klinikinę praktiką Vilniaus universiteto ligoninės Santaros klinikų (VULSK) Santaros vaisingumo centre (SVC) ir atlikti PGT procedūrų retrospektyvinę analizę po įdiegimo.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37733426
doi: 10.15388/Amed.2022.29.2.9
pii: Amed.2022.29.2.9
pmc: PMC9799000
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

225-235

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2022 Eglė Stukaitė-Ruibienė, Živilė Gudlevičienė, Andrė Amšiejienė, Evelina Dagytė, Rimantas Gricius, Kristina Grigalionienė, Algirdas Utkus, Diana Ramašauskaitė. Published by Vilnius University Press.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Références

Fertil Steril. 2018 Mar;109(3):429-436
pubmed: 29566854
Fertil Steril. 2018 Apr;109(4):627-632
pubmed: 29605407
Fertil Steril. 2017 Sep;108(3):393-406
pubmed: 28760517
Hum Reprod Open. 2021 Aug 05;2021(3):hoab026
pubmed: 34377841
J Assist Reprod Genet. 2021 Mar;38(3):709-718
pubmed: 33409753
J Hum Reprod Sci. 2018 Oct-Dec;11(4):306-314
pubmed: 30787513
Genes (Basel). 2020 Aug 21;11(9):
pubmed: 32825792
F S Rep. 2020 Sep 25;1(3):249-256
pubmed: 34223252
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Sep 8;9:CD005291
pubmed: 32898291
Hum Reprod Open. 2020 May 29;2020(3):hoaa018
pubmed: 32500103
J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod. 2020 May;49(5):101723
pubmed: 32113002
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2019 Apr;235:1-5
pubmed: 30743159
Hum Reprod. 2007 Jun;22(6):1506-12
pubmed: 17376819
Acta Med Litu. 2020;27(2):76-83
pubmed: 34113212
Hum Reprod. 2019 Dec 1;34(12):2340-2348
pubmed: 31811307
Clin Biochem. 2018 Dec;62:2-10
pubmed: 29555319
Hum Reprod Open. 2020 May 29;2020(3):hoaa021
pubmed: 32524036
Hum Reprod. 2019 Feb 1;34(2):268-275
pubmed: 30500907
Eur J Med Genet. 2019 Aug;62(8):103670
pubmed: 31136844
Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet. 2022 Jun;44(6):578-585
pubmed: 35576968
PLoS Med. 2012;9(12):e1001356
pubmed: 23271957
Mil Med. 2020 Sep 18;185(9-10):e1700-e1705
pubmed: 32633326
Fertil Steril. 2019 Dec;112(6):1071-1079.e7
pubmed: 31551155
Hum Reprod. 2021 Jul 19;36(8):2339-2344
pubmed: 34027546
Fertil Steril. 2010 Jan;93(1):16.e1-10
pubmed: 18992879
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Feb 4;2:CD011184
pubmed: 33539543
Hum Reprod Open. 2020 May 29;2020(3):hoaa017
pubmed: 32500102

Auteurs

Eglė Stukaitė-Ruibienė (E)

Vilnius University, Faculty of Medicine, Vilnius, Lithuania.

Živilė Gudlevičienė (Ž)

Vilnius University, Faculty of Medicine, Vilnius, Lithuania.

Andrė Amšiejienė (A)

Centre of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Santaros Fertility Centre, Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine Vilnius University, Lithuania.

Evelina Dagytė (E)

Centre for Medical Genetics, Institute of Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine Vilnius University, Lithuania.

Rimantas Gricius (R)

Centre of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Santaros Fertility Centre, Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine Vilnius University, Lithuania.

Kristina Grigalionienė (K)

Centre for Medical Genetics, Institute of Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine Vilnius University, Lithuania.

Algirdas Utkus (A)

Vilnius University, Faculty of Medicine, Vilnius, Lithuania.
Centre for Medical Genetics, Institute of Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine Vilnius University, Lithuania.

Diana Ramašauskaitė (D)

Vilnius University, Faculty of Medicine, Vilnius, Lithuania.
Centre of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine Vilnius University, Lithuania.

Classifications MeSH