Bioburden assessment of necrotic teeth disinfected with sodium hypochlorite, diode laser, and photodynamic therapy using flow cytometry-a randomized double-blinded clinical trial.
Diode laser
Methylene blue
Photodynamic therapy
Root canal disinfection
Sodium hypochlorite
Journal
Lasers in medical science
ISSN: 1435-604X
Titre abrégé: Lasers Med Sci
Pays: England
ID NLM: 8611515
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
22 Sep 2023
22 Sep 2023
Historique:
received:
10
09
2022
accepted:
06
09
2023
medline:
25
9
2023
pubmed:
22
9
2023
entrez:
22
9
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
This study aimed to comparatively evaluate the disinfecting potential of sodium hypochlorite, diode laser, and photodynamic therapy in non-vital teeth with or without periapical rarefaction. Forty-five patients with the diagnosis of pulp necrosis with apical rarefaction were randomly assigned to three groups (n = 15) based on the disinfection protocol. Access cavities were prepared and pre-instrumentation microbial samples were taken using a paper point. Working length determination followed by cleaning and shaping with rotary files was performed. The canals were lubricated with ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) during instrumentation and finally rinsed with copious amounts of saline. Canals in group 1 were irrigated with 5 mL of 5.25% NaOCl, those in group 2 received irradiation with 808-nm diode laser (30 s, 7W), and those in group 3 were soaked with methylene blue photosensitizer (5 min) before irradiation with 660-nm diode laser (3 min). Post-disinfection microbial samples were collected using a paper point. Pre- and post-disinfection live bacterial counts were analyzed using a flow cytometer. The data were statistically analyzed using one-way ANOVA and Student's t-test. Comparison of pre-instrumentation mean live bacterial count showed no significant difference between the groups (p > 0.05). The mean live bacterial count post-disinfection was 41.07%, 46.99%, and 34.45% in groups 1-3 respectively. A significant reduction in the bacterial count was seen following disinfection in all the groups (p < 0.05). It can be concluded that both diode laser and photodynamic therapy were equally effective as 5.25% NaOCl in reducing the bioburden in root canals. TRIAL REGISTRATION: CTRI/2018/03/012667.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37735303
doi: 10.1007/s10103-023-03877-0
pii: 10.1007/s10103-023-03877-0
doi:
Substances chimiques
Sodium Hypochlorite
DY38VHM5OD
Photosensitizing Agents
0
Types de publication
Randomized Controlled Trial
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
216Informations de copyright
© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag London Ltd., part of Springer Nature.
Références
Chakraborty P, Chattopadhyay UK (2005) A study on the polymicrobial etiology of root canal infections in anterior non-vital teeth in a Government Hospital in Kolkata, India. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci 9(2):113–116
pubmed: 15945500
Haapasalo M, Udnæs T, Endal U (2003) Persistent, recurrent, and acquired infection of the root canal system post-treatment. Endod Topics 6(1):29–56. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1601-1546.2003.00041.x
doi: 10.1111/j.1601-1546.2003.00041.x
Mohammadi Z, Abbott PV (2009) The properties and applications of chlorhexidine in endodontics. Int J Endod 42(4):288–302. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.2008.01540.x
doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2008.01540.x
Ashofteh K, Sohrabi K, Iranparvar K, Chiniforush N (2014) In vitro comparison of the antibacterial effect of three intracanal irrigants and diode laser on root canals infected with Enterococcus faecalis. Iran J Microbiol 6(1):26–30
pubmed: 25954488
pmcid: 4419042
Estrela C, Estrela CR, Barbin EL, Spanó JC, Marchesan MA, Pécora JD (2002) Mechanism of action of sodium hypochlorite. Br Dent J 13(2):113–117. https://doi.org/10.5395/rde.2012.37.3.185
doi: 10.5395/rde.2012.37.3.185
Marending M, Luder HU, Brunner TJ, Knecht S, Stark WJ, Zehnder M (2007) Effect of sodium hypochlorite on human root dentine–mechanical, chemical and structural evaluation. Int Endod J 40(10):786–793. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.2007.01287.x
doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2007.01287.x
pubmed: 17697105
Pelozo LL, Silva-Neto RD, Salvador SL, Sousa-Neto MD, Souza-Gabriel AE (2023) Adjuvant therapy with a 980-nm diode laser in root canal retreatment: randomized clinical trial with 1-year follow-up. Lasers Med Sci 38(1):77
doi: 10.1007/s10103-022-03659-0
pubmed: 36823417
pmcid: 9950011
Moritz A, Schoop U (2006) Lasers in endodontics chapter 6 in A Mortiz Oral laser application: Quintessenz Verlags-Gmbh 241–313. https://doi.org/10.12691/ijdsr-2-6B-8
Kaiwar A, Usha HL, Meena N, Ashwini P, Murthy CS (2013) The efficiency of root canal disinfection using a diode laser: in vitro study. Indian J Dent Res 24(1):14. https://doi.org/10.4103/0970-9290.114916
doi: 10.4103/0970-9290.114916
pubmed: 23852227
da Costa RA, Nogueira GE, Antoniazzi JH, Moritz A, Zezell DM (2007) Effects of diode laser (810 nm) irradiation on root canal walls: thermographic and morphological studies. J Endod 33(3):252–255
doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2006.09.002
Sibata CH, Colussi VC, Oleinick NL, Kinsella TJ (2000) Photodynamic therapy: a new concept in medical treatment. Braz J Med Biol Res 33(8):869–880. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-879X2000000800002
doi: 10.1590/S0100-879X2000000800002
pubmed: 11023333
Bonsor SJ, Nichol R, Reid TM, Pearson GJ (2006) Microbiological evaluation of photo-activated disinfection in endodontics (an in vivo study). Br Dent J 200(6):337–341. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.4813371
doi: 10.1038/sj.bdj.4813371
pubmed: 16568063
Fimple JL, Fontana CR, Foschi F, Ruggiero K, Song X, Pagonis TC, Tanner AC, Kent R, Doukas AG, Stashenko PP, Soukos NS (2008) Photodynamic treatment of endodontic polymicrobial infection in vitro. J Endod 34(6):728–734. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2008.03.011
doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2008.03.011
pubmed: 18498901
pmcid: 2596687
Asnaashari M, Ashraf H, Rahmati A, Amini N (2017) A comparison between the effect of photodynamic therapy by LED and calcium hydroxide therapy for root canal disinfection against Enterococcus faecalis: a randomized controlled trial. Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther 17:226–232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pdpdt.2016.12.009
doi: 10.1016/j.pdpdt.2016.12.009
pubmed: 28040502
Tenore G, Palaia G, Migliau G, Mohsen A, Rocchetti F, Gaimari G, Impellizzeri A, Salapata Y, Berlutti F, Polimeni A, Romeo U (2020) Evaluation of photodynamic therapy using a diode laser 635 nm as an adjunct to conventional chemo-mechanical endodontic procedures against enterococcus faecalis biofilm: Ex-vivo study. Appl Sci 10(8):2925. https://doi.org/10.3390/app10082925
doi: 10.3390/app10082925
Shehab NF, Alshamaa ZA, Taha MYM (2013) Evaluation of antibacterial efficacy of elexxion diode laser 810nm on the infected root canals (in vitro and in vivo study). Int J Dent Sci Res 1(2):23–27
Kamath P, Kundabala M, Shenoy S, Hedge V, Thukral N (2014) An evaluation of horizontal depth of penetration of penetration of various irrigants into the dentinal tubules when used alone in combination with diode laser. An in vitro study. J Interdiscip Dentistry 4(3):130
doi: 10.4103/2229-5194.147331
George R, Walsh JL (2012) Laser fiber-optic modifications and their role in endodontics. J Laser Dent 20(1):24–30. [Google Scholar] [Ref list]
Möller AJ (1966) Microbiological examination of root canals and periapical tissues of human teeth. Methodological studies. Odontologisk tidskrift 74(5):Suppl-1
Schulz KF, Grimes DA (2002) Generation of allocation sequences in randomised trials: chance, not choice. The Lancet 359(9305):515–519. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(02)07683-3
doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(02)07683-3
Hossain MS, Johannisson A, Wallgren M, Nagy S, Siqueira AP, Rodriguez-Martinez H (2011) Flow cytometry for the assessment of animal sperm integrity and functionality: state of the art. Asian J Androl 13(3):406. https://doi.org/10.1038/aja.2011.15
doi: 10.1038/aja.2011.15
pubmed: 21478895
pmcid: 3739346
Priyanka P, Beri L (2014) Evaluation of photodynamic therapy in disinfection of deeper dentinal tubules in a root canal: an in vitro study. Int J Sci Stud 2:7. https://doi.org/10.7860/jcdr/2014/11047.5155
doi: 10.7860/jcdr/2014/11047.5155
Teja KV, Janani K, Srivastava KC, Shrivastava D, Jose J, Marya A, Karobari MI (2021) Comparison of herbal agents with sodium hypochlorite as root canal irrigant: a systematic review of in vitro studies. Evid-Based Complement Altern Med 25:2021
Mohammadi Z (2008) Sodium hypochlorite in endodontics: an update review. Int Endod J 58(6):329–341. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1875-595x.2008.tb00354.x
doi: 10.1111/j.1875-595x.2008.tb00354.x
Ercan E, Özekinci T, Atakul F, Gül K (2004) Antibacterial activity of 2% chlorhexidine gluconate and 5.25% sodium hypochlorite in infected root canal: in vivo study. J Endod 30(2):84–7. https://doi.org/10.4103/JCD.JCD_227_17
Giardino L, Morra M, Becce C, Pappen FG, Mohammadi Z, Palazzi F (2012) Comparative wettability of different sodium hypochlorite solutions. G Ital Endod 26(2):57–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gien.2012.06.002
doi: 10.1016/j.gien.2012.06.002
Shehab NF, Alshamaa ZA, Taha MYM (2013) Evaluation of antibacterial efficacy of elexxion diode laser 810nm on the infected root canals (in vitro and in vivo study). Int J Dent Sci Res 1(2):23–27. https://doi.org/10.12691/ijdsr-1-2-1
doi: 10.12691/ijdsr-1-2-1
Agrawal AA, Kolhe S, Sope A, Erlewad D (2016) Root canal disinfection potential of 5.25% sodium hypochlorite, 2% chlorhexidine and 810nm diode laser-a comparative in vitro antimicrobial study. Int J Oral Craniofac Sci 2(1):035–8. https://doi.org/10.17352/2455-4634.000016
de Oliveira BP, Aguiar CM, Câmara AC (2014) Photodynamic therapy in combating the causative microorganisms from endodontic infections. Eur Dent J 8(3):130–134. https://doi.org/10.4103/1305-7456.137662
doi: 10.4103/1305-7456.137662
Garcez AS, Nuñez SC, Hamblin MR, Ribeiro MS (2008) Antimicrobial effects of photodynamic therapy on patients with necrotic pulps and periapical lesion. J Endod 34(2):138–142
doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2007.10.020
pubmed: 18215668