Assessing walking ability using a robotic gait trainer: opportunities and limitations of assist-as-needed control in spinal cord injury.
Assessment
Assist-as-needed
Gait
Lokomat
Rehabilitation
Robotic gait training
Spinal cord injury
Walking
Journal
Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation
ISSN: 1743-0003
Titre abrégé: J Neuroeng Rehabil
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101232233
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
21 09 2023
21 09 2023
Historique:
received:
06
05
2022
accepted:
27
07
2023
medline:
25
9
2023
pubmed:
22
9
2023
entrez:
22
9
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Walking impairments are a common consequence of neurological disorders and are assessed with clinical scores that suffer from several limitations. Robot-assisted locomotor training is becoming an established clinical practice. Besides training, these devices could be used for assessing walking ability in a controlled environment. Here, we propose an adaptive assist-as-needed (AAN) control for a treadmill-based robotic exoskeleton, the Lokomat, that reduces the support of the device (body weight support and impedance of the robotic joints) based on the ability of the patient to follow a gait pattern displayed on screen. We hypothesize that the converged values of robotic support provide valid and reliable information about individuals' walking ability. Fifteen participants with spinal cord injury and twelve controls used the AAN software in the Lokomat twice within a week and were assessed using clinical scores (10MWT, TUG). We used a regression method to identify the robotic measure that could provide the most relevant information about walking ability and determined the test-retest reliability. We also checked whether this result could be extrapolated to non-ambulatory and to unimpaired subjects. The AAN controller could be used in patients with different injury severity levels. A linear model based on one variable (robotic knee stiffness at terminal swing) could explain 74% of the variance in the 10MWT and 61% in the TUG in ambulatory patients and showed good relative reliability but poor absolute reliability. Adding the variable 'maximum hip flexor torque' to the model increased the explained variance above 85%. This did not extend to non-ambulatory nor to able-bodied individuals, where variables related to stance phase and to push-off phase seem more relevant. The novel AAN software for the Lokomat can be used to quantify the support required by a patient while performing robotic gait training. The adaptive software might enable more challenging training conditions tuned to the ability of the individuals. While the current implementation is not ready for assessment in clinical practice, we could demonstrate that this approach is safe, and it could be integrated as assist-as-needed training, rather than as assessment. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02425332.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Walking impairments are a common consequence of neurological disorders and are assessed with clinical scores that suffer from several limitations. Robot-assisted locomotor training is becoming an established clinical practice. Besides training, these devices could be used for assessing walking ability in a controlled environment. Here, we propose an adaptive assist-as-needed (AAN) control for a treadmill-based robotic exoskeleton, the Lokomat, that reduces the support of the device (body weight support and impedance of the robotic joints) based on the ability of the patient to follow a gait pattern displayed on screen. We hypothesize that the converged values of robotic support provide valid and reliable information about individuals' walking ability.
METHODS
Fifteen participants with spinal cord injury and twelve controls used the AAN software in the Lokomat twice within a week and were assessed using clinical scores (10MWT, TUG). We used a regression method to identify the robotic measure that could provide the most relevant information about walking ability and determined the test-retest reliability. We also checked whether this result could be extrapolated to non-ambulatory and to unimpaired subjects.
RESULTS
The AAN controller could be used in patients with different injury severity levels. A linear model based on one variable (robotic knee stiffness at terminal swing) could explain 74% of the variance in the 10MWT and 61% in the TUG in ambulatory patients and showed good relative reliability but poor absolute reliability. Adding the variable 'maximum hip flexor torque' to the model increased the explained variance above 85%. This did not extend to non-ambulatory nor to able-bodied individuals, where variables related to stance phase and to push-off phase seem more relevant.
CONCLUSIONS
The novel AAN software for the Lokomat can be used to quantify the support required by a patient while performing robotic gait training. The adaptive software might enable more challenging training conditions tuned to the ability of the individuals. While the current implementation is not ready for assessment in clinical practice, we could demonstrate that this approach is safe, and it could be integrated as assist-as-needed training, rather than as assessment.
TRIAL REGISTRATION
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02425332.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37735690
doi: 10.1186/s12984-023-01226-4
pii: 10.1186/s12984-023-01226-4
pmc: PMC10515081
doi:
Banques de données
ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT02425332']
Types de publication
Clinical Study
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
121Informations de copyright
© 2023. BioMed Central Ltd., part of Springer Nature.
Références
Li S, Francisco GE, Zhou P. Post-stroke hemiplegic gait: new perspective and insights. Front Physiol. 2018;9:1–8.
doi: 10.3389/fphys.2018.01021
Lam T, Noonan VK, Eng JJ, SCIRE Research Team A. Systematic review of functional ambulation outcome measures in spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord. 2008;46:246–54. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.sc.3102134 .
doi: 10.1038/sj.sc.3102134
pubmed: 17923844
GBD 2016 Traumatic Brain Injury and Spinal Cord Injury Collaborators. Global, regional, and national burden of traumatic brain injury and spinal cord injury, 1990–2016: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016. Lancet Neurol. 2019;18:56–87.
Stolze H, Klebe S, Baecker C, Zechlin C, Friege L, Pohle S, et al. Prevalence of gait disorders in hospitalized neurological patients. Mov Disord. 2005;20:89–94. https://doi.org/10.1002/mds.20266 .
doi: 10.1002/mds.20266
pubmed: 15390043
Burns SP, Gelding DG, Rolle WA, Graziani V, Ditunno JF. Recovery of ambulation in motor-incomplete tetraplegia. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1997;78:1169–72.
pubmed: 9365343
doi: 10.1016/S0003-9993(97)90326-9
Winstein CJ, Stein J, Arena R, Bates B, Cherney LR, Cramer SC, et al. Guidelines for adult stroke rehabilitation and recovery: a guideline for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke. 2016;47:e98-169.
pubmed: 27145936
doi: 10.1161/STR.0000000000000098
Sezer N, Akkuş S, Uğurlu FG. Chronic complications of spinal cord injury. World J Orthop. 2015;6:24–33.
pubmed: 25621208
pmcid: 4303787
doi: 10.5312/wjo.v6.i1.24
Bohannon RW, Horton MG, Wikholm JB. Importance of four variables of walking to patients with stroke. Int J Rehabil Res. 1991;14:246–50.
pubmed: 1938039
doi: 10.1097/00004356-199109000-00010
Ditunno PL, Patrick M, Stineman M, Ditunno JF. Who wants to walk? Preferences for recovery after SCI: a longitudinal and cross-sectional study. Spinal Cord. 2008;46:500–6. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.sc.3102172 .
doi: 10.1038/sj.sc.3102172
pubmed: 18209742
Wirz M, van Hedel HJA. Balance, gait, and falls in spinal cord injury. In: Day BL, Lord SR, editors. Handbook of clinical neurology. Amsterdam: Elsevier B.V; 2018.
Awai L, Curt A. Comprehensive assessment of walking function after human spinal cord injury. 1st ed. Amsterdam: Elsevier B.V; 2015. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.pbr.2014.12.004 .
doi: 10.1016/bs.pbr.2014.12.004
Bolliger M, Blight AR, Field-Fote EC, Musselman K, Rossignol S, Barthélemy D, et al. Lower extremity outcome measures: considerations for clinical trials in spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord. 2018;56:628–42. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41393-018-0097-8 .
doi: 10.1038/s41393-018-0097-8
pubmed: 29700477
pmcid: 6131138
Maggioni S, Melendez-Calderon A, van Asseldonk E, Klamroth-Marganska V, Lünenburger L, Riener R, et al. Robot-aided assessment of lower extremity functions: a review. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2016;13:72. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12984-016-0180-3 .
doi: 10.1186/s12984-016-0180-3
pubmed: 27485106
pmcid: 4969661
Colombo G, Wirz M, Dietz V. Driven gait orthosis for improvement of locomotor training in paraplegic patients. Spinal Cord. 2001;252–5.
Mehrholz J, Thomas S, Kugler J, Pohl M, Elsner B, Mehrholz J, et al. Electromechanical-assisted training for walking a er stroke (Review). Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020.
Reinkensmeyer DJ, Dietz V. Neurorehabilitation technology. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2016.
doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-28603-7
Hwang J, Shin Y, Park J-H, Cha YJ, You JSH. Effects of Walkbot gait training on kinematics, kinetics, and clinical gait function in paraplegia and quadriplegia. NeuroRehabilitation. 2018;42:481–9.
pubmed: 29660947
doi: 10.3233/NRE-172226
Lambercy O, Maggioni S, Lünenburger L, Gassert R, Bolliger M. Robotic and wearable sensor technologies for measurements/clinical assessments. In: Dietz V, Reinkensmeyer DJ, editors. Neurorehabilitation technology. 2nd ed. Cham: Springer International; 2016.
Maggioni S, Lünenburger L, Riener R, Melendez-Calderon A. Robot-aided assessment of walking function based on an adaptive algorithm. In: 2015 IEEE 14th International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics. Singapore; 2015. pp. 804–9.
Emken JL, Bobrow JE, Reinkensmeyer DJ. Robotic movement training as an optimization problem: designing a controller that assists only as needed. In: Proceedings of the 2005 IEEE 9th International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics. Chicago, IL, USA; 2005. pp. 307–12. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICORR.2005.1501108 .
Maggioni S, Stucki S, Lünenburger L, Riener R, Melendez-Calderon A. A bio-inspired robotic test bench for repeatable and safe testing of rehabilitation robots. In: Proceedings of the IEEE RAS and EMBS International Conference on Biomedical Robotics and Biomechatronics. Singapore; 2016. pp. 894–9.
Maggioni S, Reinert N, Lünenburger L, Melendez-Calderon A. An adaptive and hybrid end-point/joint impedance controller for lower limb exoskeletons. Front Robot AI. 2018;5.
Jezernick S, Colombo G, Morari M. Rehabilitation with a 4-DOF robotic orthosis. IEEE Trans Robot Autom. 2004;20:574–82.
doi: 10.1109/TRA.2004.825515
Stoquart G, Detrembleur C, Lejeune T. Effect of speed on kinematic, kinetic, electromyographic and energetic reference values during treadmill walking. Neurophysiol Clin. 2008;38:105–16.
pubmed: 18423331
doi: 10.1016/j.neucli.2008.02.002
Emken JL, Benitez R, Reinkensmeyer DJ. Human-robot cooperative movement training: learning a novel sensory motor transformation during walking with robotic assistance-as-needed. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2007;4. https://doi.org/10.1186/1743-0003-4-8 .
Perry J. Gait analysis. Normal and pathological function. Thorofare, NJ, USA: SLACK Incorporated; 1992.
Winter DA. Biomechanics and motor control of human gait: normal, elderly and pathological. 2nd edn. Waterloo, Canada: Waterloo Biomechanics; 1991.
Duschau-Wicke A, Felsenstein S, Riener R. Adaptive body weight support controls human activity during robot-aided gait training. In: 2009 IEEE 11th International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics. Kyoto; 2009. pp. 413–8.
Van HHJ, Wirz M, Dietz V. Assessing walking ability in subjects with spinal cord injury: validity and reliability of 3 walking tests. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2005;86:190–6.
doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2004.02.010
Wirz M, Muller R, Bastiaenen C. Falls in persons with spinal cord injury: validity and reliability of the Berg Balance Scale. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2010;24:70–7.
pubmed: 19675123
doi: 10.1177/1545968309341059
Bolliger M, Banz R, Dietz V, Lünenburger L. Standardized voluntary force measurement in a lower extremity rehabilitation robot. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2008;5:23. https://doi.org/10.1186/1743-0003-5-23 .
doi: 10.1186/1743-0003-5-23
pubmed: 18957092
pmcid: 2596777
Tindall B, Council MR. Aids to the investigation of the peripheral nervous system. Med Res Counc. 1986.
Marino RJ, Jones L, Kirshblum S, Tal J, Dasgupta A. Reliability and repeatability of the motor and sensory examination of the international standards for neurological classification of spinal cord injury. J Spinal Cord Med. 2008;31:166–70.
pubmed: 18581663
pmcid: 2565479
doi: 10.1080/10790268.2008.11760707
NASA TLX. https://humansystems.arc.nasa.gov/groups/TLX/ . Accessed 7 Mar 2022.
Bernhardt M, Frey M, Colombo G, Riener R. Hybrid force-position control yields cooperative behaviour of the rehabilitation robot LOKOMAT. In: Proc ICORR 2005—IEEE Int Conf Rehabil Robot. 2005;:536–9.
Baker R. Measuring walking: a handbook of clinical gait analysis. 1st ed. London: Mac Keith Press; 2013.
Olney SJ, Griffin MP, McBride ID. Temporal, kinematic, and kinetic variables related to gait speed in subjects with hemiplegia: a regression approach. Phys Ther. 1994;74:872–85.
pubmed: 8066114
doi: 10.1093/ptj/74.9.872
Tibshirani R. Regression Shrinkage and Selection via the Lasso. J R Stat Soc Ser B. 1996;58:267–88.
Bach FR, Project-team IW. Bolasso: Model Consistent Lasso Estimation through the Bootstrap. In: ICML ’08 Proceedings of the 25th international conference on Machine learning. Helsinki, Finland; 2008.
Sauerbrei W. The use of resampling methods to simplify regression models in medical statistics. J R Stat Soc Ser C Appl Stat. 1999;48:313–29.
doi: 10.1111/1467-9876.00155
Barbeau H, Nadeau S, Garneau C. Physical determinants, emerging concepts, and training approaches in gait of individuals with spinal cord injury. J Neurotrauma. 2006;23:571–85.
pubmed: 16629638
doi: 10.1089/neu.2006.23.571
Kim CM, Eng JJ, Whittaker MW. Level walking and ambulatory capacity in persons with incomplete spinal cord injury: relationship with muscle strength. Spiinal Cord. 2004;42:156–62.
doi: 10.1038/sj.sc.3101569
Gold D. Dealing with multicollinearity: a brief overview and introduction to tolerant methods. Water Programming: A Collaborative Research Blog. 2017. https://waterprogramming.wordpress.com/2017/02/22/dealing-with-multicollinearity-a-brief-overview-and-introduction-to-tolerant-methods/ . Accessed 6 Aug 2019.
Atkinson G, Nevill A. Statistical methods for assessing measurement error (reliability) in variables relevant to sports medicine. Sport Med. 1998;26:217–38.
doi: 10.2165/00007256-199826040-00002
Altman DG, Bland JM. Measurement in medicine: the analysis of method comparison studies. Stat. 1981;1983(32):307–17.
Ran Klein. Bland-Altman and Correlation Plot. MATLAB Central File Exchange. 2019. http://www.mathworks.com/matlabcentral/fileexchange/45049-bland-altman-and-correlation-plot . Accessed 18 Aug 2019.
Baker R. Why we walk the way we do 1 (framework). 2013. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iG6KfzoqWyg . Accessed 5 Aug 2019.
Gage JR. Gait analysis in cerebral palsy. Oxford: Cambridge University Press; 1991.
Podsiadlo D, Richardson S. The timed “up & go”: a test of basic functional mobility for frail elderly persons. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1991;39:142–8.
pubmed: 1991946
doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1991.tb01616.x
Chen T, Chou LS. Effects of muscle strength and balance control on sit-to-walk and turn durations in the timed up and go test. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2017;98:2471–6.
pubmed: 28465222
doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2017.04.003
Ng S, Hui-Chan C. The timed up & go test: its reliability and association with lower-limb impairments and locomotor capacities in people with chronic stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2005;86:1641–7.
pubmed: 16084820
doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2005.01.011
Labruyère R, Van HHJA. Strength training versus robot-assisted gait training after incomplete spinal cord injury: a randomized pilot study in patients depending on walking assistance. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2014;11:1–12.
doi: 10.1186/1743-0003-11-4
Weir JP. Quantifying test–retest reliability using the intraclass correlation coefficient and the SEM. J Strength Cond Res. 2005;19:231–40.
pubmed: 15705040
van Hedel H. Gait speed in relation to categories of functional ambulation after spinal cord injury. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2009;23:343–50.
pubmed: 19036717
doi: 10.1177/1545968308324224
Van Silfhout L, Hosman AJF, Bartels RHMA, Edwards MJR, Abel R, Curt A, et al. Ten meters walking speed in spinal cord-injured patients: does speed predict who walks and who rolls? Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2017;31:842–50.
pubmed: 28786305
doi: 10.1177/1545968317723751
Goldberg SR, Sylvia O, Arnold AS, Gage JR, Delp SL. Kinematic and kinetic factors that correlate with improved knee flexion following treatment for stiff-knee gait. J Biomech. 2006;39:689–98.
pubmed: 16439238
doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2005.01.015
Goldberg S, Anderson F, Pandy M, Delp S. Muscles that influence knee flexion velocity in double support: implications for stiff-knee gait. J Biomech. 2004;37:1189–96.
pubmed: 15212924
doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2003.12.005
Van Kammen K, Boonstra AM, Van Der Woude LHV, Reinders-Messelink HA, Den Otter R. Differences in muscle activity and temporal step parameters between Lokomat guided walking and treadmill walking in post-stroke hemiparetic patients and healthy walkers. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2017;14:1–11.
Hidler JM, Wall AE. Alterations in muscle activation patterns during robotic-assisted walking. Clin Biomech. 2005;20:184–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2004.09.016 .
doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2004.09.016
Coenen P, van Werven G, van Nunen MPM, Van Dieën JH, Gerrits KHL, Janssen TWJ. Robot-assisted walking vs overground walking in stroke patients: an evaluation of muscle activity. J Rehabil Med. 2012;44:331–7. https://doi.org/10.2340/16501977-0954 .
doi: 10.2340/16501977-0954
pubmed: 22453772
Hidler J, Wisman W, Neckel N. Kinematic trajectories while walking within the Lokomat robotic gait-orthosis. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2008;23:1251–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2008.08.004 .
doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2008.08.004
pubmed: 18849098
Nadeau S, Arsenault AB, Gravel D, Bourbonnais D. Analysis of the clinical factors determining natural and maximal gait speeds in adults with a stroke. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 1999;78.
Kwon IS, Oldaker S, Schrager M, Talbot LA, Fozard JL, Metter EJ. Relationship between muscle strength and the time taken to complete a standardized walk-turn-walk test. J Gerontol Ser A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2001;56:B398-404.
doi: 10.1093/gerona/56.9.B398
Bohannon RW. Comfortable and maximum walking speed of adults aged 20–79 years: reference values and determinants. Age Ageing. 2016;26:15–9.
doi: 10.1093/ageing/26.1.15
Willén C, Stibrant Sunnerhagen K, Ekman C, Grimby G. How is walking speed related to muscle strength? A study of healthy persons and persons with late effects of polio. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2004;85:1923–8.
pubmed: 15605327
doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2003.11.040
Plummer P, Eskes G, Wallace S, Giuffrida C, Fraas M, Campbell G, et al. Cognitive-motor interference during functional mobility after stroke: state of the science and implications for future research. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2013;94:2565–74.
pubmed: 23973751
doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2013.08.002
Koopman B, van Asseldonk EH, van der Kooij H. Selective control of gait subtasks in robotic gait training: foot clearance support in stroke survivors with a powered exoskeleton. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2013;10:3. https://doi.org/10.1186/1743-0003-10-3 .
doi: 10.1186/1743-0003-10-3
pubmed: 23336754
pmcid: 3585791
Haufe FL, Maggioni S, Melendez-Calderon A. Reference Trajectory Adaptation to Improve Human-Robot Interaction: A Database-Driven Approach. In: Proc Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc EMBS. 2018;2018–July:1727–30.
Bayón C, Fricke SS, Rocon E, Van Der Kooij H, Van Asseldonk EHF. Performance-based adaptive assistance for diverse subtasks of walking in a robotic gait trainer: description of a new controller and preliminary results. In: Proc IEEE RAS EMBS Int Conf Biomed Robot Biomechatronics. 2018;2018–Augus: 414–9.
Fricke SS, Bayón C, Der Kooij H, Van EEH. Automatic versus manual tuning of robot-assisted gait training in people with neurological disorders. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2020;17:1–15.
doi: 10.1186/s12984-019-0630-9
Emken JL, Harkema SJ, Beres-jones JA, Ferreira CK, Reinkensmeyer DJ. Feasibility of manual teach-and-replay and continuous impedance shaping for robotic locomotor training following spinal cord injury. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2008;55:322–34.
pubmed: 18232376
doi: 10.1109/TBME.2007.910683
Park IJ, Park JH, Seong HY, You JSH, Kim SJ, Min JH, et al. Comparative effects of different assistance force during robot-assisted gait training on locomotor functions in patients with subacute stroke: an assessor-blind, randomized controlled trial. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2019;98:58–64.
pubmed: 30142092
doi: 10.1097/PHM.0000000000001027
Melendez-Calderon A, Maggioni S. Challenges in adaptive robot-assisted gait training: the balancing act of minimizing assistance while preserving safety. In: Torricelli D, Akay M, Pons JL, editors. Converging clinical and engineering research on neurorehabilitation II. Springer; 2022. p. 39–43.
doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-70316-5_7
Laszlo C, Munari D, Maggioni S, Knechtle D, Wolf P, De Bon D. Feasibility of an intelligent algorithm based on an assist-as-needed controller for a robot-aided gait trainer (Lokomat) in neurological disorders: a longitudinal pilot study. Brain Sci. 2023;13:612. https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci13040612 .
doi: 10.3390/brainsci13040612
pubmed: 37190576
pmcid: 10136719