Coupling of coastal activity with tidal cycles is stronger in tool-using capuchins (

activity patterns foraging islands tidal cycles tool use

Journal

Royal Society open science
ISSN: 2054-5703
Titre abrégé: R Soc Open Sci
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101647528

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Sep 2023
Historique:
received: 21 03 2023
accepted: 01 09 2023
medline: 22 9 2023
pubmed: 22 9 2023
entrez: 22 9 2023
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Terrestrial mammals exploiting coastal resources must cope with the challenge that resource availability and accessibility fluctuate with tidal cycles. Tool use can improve foraging efficiency and provide access to structurally protected resources that are otherwise unavailable (e.g. molluscs and fruits). To understand how variable accessibility of valuable resources shapes behavioural patterns, and whether tool use aids in the efficient exploitation of intertidal resources, we compared the relationship between tidal cycles and activity patterns of tool-using versus non-tool-using groups of white-faced capuchin monkeys on Jicarón Island in Coiba National Park, Panama. Although tool use on Jicarón is localized to a small stretch of coast (approx. 1 km), all coastal groups forage on intertidal resources. Using more than 5 years of camera trap data at varying distances from the coast, we found that capuchins on Jicarón showed increased coastal activity during specific parts of the tidal cycle, and that this relationship differed between tool-using and non-tool-using groups, as well as between seasons. Activity patterns of tool-using capuchins were more strongly and consistently tied to tidal cycles compared with non-tool-users, indicating that tool use might allow for more efficient exploitation of tidal resources. Our findings highlight the potential of tool use to aid niche expansion.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37736530
doi: 10.1098/rsos.230355
pii: rsos230355
pmc: PMC10509577
doi:

Banques de données

figshare
['10.6084/m9.figshare.c.6837151']

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

230355

Informations de copyright

© 2023 The Authors.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare that are relevant to the content of this article.

Références

Behav Processes. 2012 Feb;89(2):153-65
pubmed: 22209954
Am J Phys Anthropol. 2002 Sep;119(1):52-66
pubmed: 12209573
Proc Biol Sci. 2021 Apr 28;288(1949):20202718
pubmed: 33878919
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2011 Apr 12;366(1567):988-96
pubmed: 21357221
Sci Rep. 2018 Sep 17;8(1):13935
pubmed: 30224791
Am J Primatol. 2009 Jul;71(7):594-608
pubmed: 19405083
J Hum Evol. 2014 Dec;77:17-40
pubmed: 25498601
Nature. 2016 Sep 14;537(7620):403-7
pubmed: 27629645
J Hum Evol. 2014 Dec;77:107-16
pubmed: 25070910
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2013 Oct 07;368(1630):20120416
pubmed: 24101626
PLoS One. 2018 Dec 20;13(12):e0209411
pubmed: 30571752
Ecology. 2015 Jan;96(1):3-15
pubmed: 26236884
Am J Phys Anthropol. 2009 Dec;140(4):603-14
pubmed: 19890868
PeerJ. 2019 May 27;7:e6876
pubmed: 31179172
R Soc Open Sci. 2018 Aug 22;5(8):181002
pubmed: 30225086
J Hum Evol. 2016 Mar;92:101-115
pubmed: 26989020
Curr Biol. 2022 Sep 26;32(18):4088-4092.e3
pubmed: 35985326
Proc Biol Sci. 2014 Apr 23;281(1784):20140374
pubmed: 24759862
Nutr Health. 2012 Jan;21(1):17-39
pubmed: 22544773
Am J Phys Anthropol. 2009 Jan;138(1):101-11
pubmed: 18711741
Nature. 2007 Oct 18;449(7164):905-8
pubmed: 17943129
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2013 Oct 07;368(1630):20120408
pubmed: 24101619
Sci Rep. 2017 Jul 24;7(1):6278
pubmed: 28740211
Am J Phys Anthropol. 2012 Nov;149(3):447-57
pubmed: 23042618
PLoS One. 2017 Jan 13;12(1):e0170255
pubmed: 28085962
Proc Biol Sci. 2021 Nov 24;288(1963):20211728
pubmed: 34814746
Ecol Evol. 2017 Jun 23;7(15):5977-5991
pubmed: 28808559
Nature. 1964 Mar 28;201:1264-6
pubmed: 14151401
J Hum Evol. 2011 Jul;61(1):97-107
pubmed: 21470663
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005 Jun 21;102(25):8939-43
pubmed: 15947077
Proc Biol Sci. 2017 Jun 14;284(1856):
pubmed: 28592681
J Hum Evol. 2020 Jun;143:102768
pubmed: 32247060

Auteurs

Zoë Goldsborough (Z)

Department for the Ecology of Animal Societies, Max Planck Institute of Animal Behavior, Konstanz, Germany.
Department of Biology, University of Konstanz, Konstanz, Germany.
Center for the Advanced Study of Collective Behavior, University of Konstanz, Konstanz, Germany.
Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute, Ancon, Panama.

Margaret C Crofoot (MC)

Department for the Ecology of Animal Societies, Max Planck Institute of Animal Behavior, Konstanz, Germany.
Department of Biology, University of Konstanz, Konstanz, Germany.
Center for the Advanced Study of Collective Behavior, University of Konstanz, Konstanz, Germany.
Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute, Ancon, Panama.

Shauhin E Alavi (SE)

Department for the Ecology of Animal Societies, Max Planck Institute of Animal Behavior, Konstanz, Germany.
Department of Biology, University of Konstanz, Konstanz, Germany.

Evelyn Del Rosario-Vargas (E)

Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute, Ancon, Panama.

Sylvia F Garza (SF)

Department for the Ecology of Animal Societies, Max Planck Institute of Animal Behavior, Konstanz, Germany.
Department of Biology, University of Konstanz, Konstanz, Germany.

Kate Tiedeman (K)

Department for the Ecology of Animal Societies, Max Planck Institute of Animal Behavior, Konstanz, Germany.

Brendan J Barrett (BJ)

Department for the Ecology of Animal Societies, Max Planck Institute of Animal Behavior, Konstanz, Germany.
Department of Biology, University of Konstanz, Konstanz, Germany.
Center for the Advanced Study of Collective Behavior, University of Konstanz, Konstanz, Germany.
Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute, Ancon, Panama.

Classifications MeSH