Cervical Disc Arthroplasty for the Treatment of Noncontiguous Cervical Degenerative Disc Disease: Results of Mid- to Long-Term Follow-up.


Journal

Orthopaedic surgery
ISSN: 1757-7861
Titre abrégé: Orthop Surg
Pays: Australia
ID NLM: 101501666

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Nov 2023
Historique:
revised: 22 08 2023
received: 26 05 2023
accepted: 27 08 2023
medline: 6 11 2023
pubmed: 22 9 2023
entrez: 22 9 2023
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

The long-term results of cervical disc arthroplasty (CDA) for noncontiguous cervical degenerative disc disease (CDDD) are still uncertain. Moreover, it is unclear whether CDA delays or avoids the degeneration of the intermediate segment (IS), leading to controversy in the field. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the mid- to long-term clinical and radiographic outcomes of CDA in treating noncontiguous CDDD and to explore whether the IS degenerated faster after CDA than other non-surgically treated adjacent segments. We retrospectively analyzed patients with noncontiguous CDDD who underwent CDA in our department between January 2008 and July 2018. The patients were divided into the CDA and hybrid surgery (HS) groups, and clinical and radiographic outcomes were evaluated at routine postoperative intervals. Clinical outcomes were assessed using the Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA), neck disability index (NDI), and visual analogue scale (VAS), while radiographic outcomes included cervical lordosis (CL), C2-C7 range of motion (ROM), segmental ROM, and disc angle (DA) at the arthroplasty level. Complications were also evaluated.Pre- and postoperative values were compared using paired t-tests or Wilcoxon rank-sum tests. Independent Student t-tests or Mann-Whitney U tests analyzed continuous data between CDA and HS groups, while chi-square or Fisher exact tests assessed categorical data. Sixty-four patients with noncontiguous CDDD, with 31 in the CDA group and 33 in the HS group, were evaluated. The mean follow-up time was over 70 months. The most frequently involved levels were C4/5 and C5/6. Both groups showed significant improvements in JOA, NDI, and VAS values after surgery. Although CL was maintained, the CL in the CDA group was consistently lower than that in the HS group (p < 0.05). There was a significant decrease in C2-C7 ROM (p < 0.05), but at the last follow-up, the C2-C7 ROM in the CDA group was greater than that in the HS group (p < 0.05). At the last follow-up, 44.3% of arthroplasty levels had developed heterotopic ossification (HO), and 48.45% had developed anterior bone loss (ABL). In addition, adjacent segment degeneration (ASDeg) was observed in the IS (22.7%), superior adjacent segment (20.6%)and inferior adjacent segment (21.9%). CDA or CDA combined with fusion are viable treatments for noncontiguous CDDD, with satisfactory outcomes after mid-to-long-term follow-up. ASDeg is similar in non-surgical segments after 70 months of follow-up. ROM of the IS issimilar to preoperative levels, indicating CDA does not increase the risk of IS degeneration.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37737031
doi: 10.1111/os.13900
pmc: PMC10622294
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

2901-2910

Subventions

Organisme : 1.3.5 project for Postdoctoral Foundation of West China Hospital of Sichuan University
ID : 2023HXBH080
Organisme : Health and Family Planning Commission of Sichuan Province
ID : 21PJ039
Organisme : Sichuan Province Youth Science and Technology Innovation Team
ID : 2023NSFSC1741
Organisme : Cadre Health Research Project of Sichuan Province
ID : ZH2023-105

Informations de copyright

© 2023 The Authors. Orthopaedic Surgery published by Tianjin Hospital and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.

Références

Spine J. 2023 Jul 22;:
pubmed: 37487933
J Neurosurg Spine. 2019 Aug 2;:1-10
pubmed: 31374546
Biomech Model Mechanobiol. 2016 Oct;15(5):1191-9
pubmed: 26697859
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009 Oct 15;34(22):E794-9
pubmed: 19829242
World Neurosurg. 2016 May;89:285-92
pubmed: 26868426
Spine J. 2019 Jul;19(7):1254-1263
pubmed: 30742975
Orthop Surg. 2020 Feb;12(1):16-30
pubmed: 31863642
J Spine Surg. 2018 Sep;4(3):496-500
pubmed: 30547110
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1994 Sep 15;19(18):2110-6
pubmed: 7825054
J Neurosurg Spine. 2019 Jun 21;:1-11
pubmed: 31226684
Eur Spine J. 2012 Mar;21(3):432-42
pubmed: 21833571
Medicine (Baltimore). 2017 Oct;96(41):e8112
pubmed: 29019878
J Neurosurg Spine. 2019 May 10;31(3):317-325
pubmed: 31075769
Int J Spine Surg. 2020 Aug;14(s2):S57-S66
pubmed: 32994307
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2020 Oct 8;21(1):664
pubmed: 33032562
J Spinal Disord Tech. 2003 Aug;16(4):384-9
pubmed: 12902954
Eur Spine J. 2012 Mar;21(3):474-81
pubmed: 21826497
Eur Spine J. 2012 Jul;21(7):1368-73
pubmed: 22270246
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2015 Oct 15;40(20):1578-85
pubmed: 26165217
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1998 Jan 15;23(2):181-6; discussion 186-7
pubmed: 9474723
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2019 Jan 31;20(1):49
pubmed: 30704444
J Biomech. 2015 May 1;48(7):1286-93
pubmed: 25814180
Neurosurgery. 2019 Feb 1;84(2):347-354
pubmed: 29635520
J Neurosurg Spine. 2009 Aug;11(2):97-100
pubmed: 19769487
Spine J. 2020 Aug;20(8):1219-1228
pubmed: 32445801
J Spinal Disord Tech. 2013 Oct;26(7):E286-92
pubmed: 23381180
Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2017 Jun;10(2):160-169
pubmed: 28493215
Orthop Surg. 2020 Dec;12(6):1760-1767
pubmed: 33044764
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2011 Mar 15;36(6):448-53
pubmed: 21372655
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1993 Sep;75(9):1298-307
pubmed: 8408151
Spine J. 2018 Dec;18(12):2171-2180
pubmed: 29709550
Eur Spine J. 2009 Mar;18(3):358-69
pubmed: 19005690
Surg Neurol Int. 2019 Jun 07;10:100
pubmed: 31528438
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009 Apr 1;34(7):706-12
pubmed: 19333104
Int J Spine Surg. 2023 Apr;17(2):230-240
pubmed: 37028803
Neurosurgery. 2021 Feb 16;88(3):497-505
pubmed: 33372218
J Biomech. 2020 Jan 2;98:109418
pubmed: 31653508
Spine J. 2021 Feb;21(2):265-272
pubmed: 32966907
J Korean Neurosurg Soc. 2012 Nov;52(5):452-8
pubmed: 23323165
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2022 Nov 2;104(21):1915-1945
pubmed: 36321969
Asian Spine J. 2019 Feb;13(1):13-21
pubmed: 30326692
Eur Spine J. 2019 Oct;28(10):2257-2265
pubmed: 31363914
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2011 Jan;153(1):123-7; discussion 128
pubmed: 20931238
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2018 Oct 15;43(20):1418-1425
pubmed: 29547460
Eur Spine J. 2023 Oct;32(10):3533-3539
pubmed: 37422768

Auteurs

Ting-Kui Wu (TK)

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.

Jun-Bo He (JB)

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.

Kang-Kang Huang (KK)

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.

Xin Rong (X)

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.

Chen Ding (C)

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.

Bei-Yu Wang (BY)

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.

Hao Liu (H)

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH