Immune monitoring-guided vs fixed duration of antiviral prophylaxis against cytomegalovirus in solid-organ transplant recipients. A Multicenter, Randomized Clinical Trial.
cell-mediated immunity
personalized medicine
prevention
transplant
viral infection
Journal
Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America
ISSN: 1537-6591
Titre abrégé: Clin Infect Dis
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9203213
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
22 Sep 2023
22 Sep 2023
Historique:
received:
06
07
2023
revised:
06
09
2023
accepted:
20
09
2023
medline:
22
9
2023
pubmed:
22
9
2023
entrez:
22
9
2023
Statut:
aheadofprint
Résumé
The use of assays detecting cytomegalovirus (CMV)-specific T-cell-mediated immunity may individualize the duration of antiviral prophylaxis in transplant recipients. In this open-label randomized trial, adult kidney and liver transplant recipients from six centers in Switzerland were enrolled if they were CMV-seronegative with seropositive donors or CMV-seropositive receiving anti-thymocyte globulins. Patients were randomized to a duration of antiviral prophylaxis based on immune-monitoring (intervention) or a fixed duration (control). Patients in the control group were planned to receive 180 days (CMV-seronegative) or 90 days (CMV-seropositive) of valganciclovir. Patients were assessed monthly with a CMV-specific interferon gamma release assay (T-Track® CMV); prophylaxis in the intervention group was stopped if the assay was positive. The primary outcomes were the proportion of patients with clinically significant CMV infection and reduction in days of prophylaxis. Between-group differences were adjusted for CMV serostatus. Overall, 193 patients were randomized (92 in the immune-monitoring and 101 in the control group) of which 185 had evaluation of the primary endpoint (87 and 98 patients, respectively). Clinically significant CMV infection occurred in 26/87 (adjusted percentage, 30.9%) in the immune-monitoring group and in 32/98 (adjusted percentage, 31.1%) in the control group (adjusted risk difference -0.1, 95%CI -13.0%, 12.7%; p = 0.064). The duration of antiviral prophylaxis was shorter in the immune-monitoring group (adjusted difference -26.0 days, 95%-CI -41.1 to -10.8 days, p < 0.001). Immune monitoring resulted in a significant reduction of antiviral prophylaxis, but we were unable to establish noninferiority of this approach on the co-primary endpoint of CMV infection.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
The use of assays detecting cytomegalovirus (CMV)-specific T-cell-mediated immunity may individualize the duration of antiviral prophylaxis in transplant recipients.
METHODS
METHODS
In this open-label randomized trial, adult kidney and liver transplant recipients from six centers in Switzerland were enrolled if they were CMV-seronegative with seropositive donors or CMV-seropositive receiving anti-thymocyte globulins. Patients were randomized to a duration of antiviral prophylaxis based on immune-monitoring (intervention) or a fixed duration (control). Patients in the control group were planned to receive 180 days (CMV-seronegative) or 90 days (CMV-seropositive) of valganciclovir. Patients were assessed monthly with a CMV-specific interferon gamma release assay (T-Track® CMV); prophylaxis in the intervention group was stopped if the assay was positive. The primary outcomes were the proportion of patients with clinically significant CMV infection and reduction in days of prophylaxis. Between-group differences were adjusted for CMV serostatus.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Overall, 193 patients were randomized (92 in the immune-monitoring and 101 in the control group) of which 185 had evaluation of the primary endpoint (87 and 98 patients, respectively). Clinically significant CMV infection occurred in 26/87 (adjusted percentage, 30.9%) in the immune-monitoring group and in 32/98 (adjusted percentage, 31.1%) in the control group (adjusted risk difference -0.1, 95%CI -13.0%, 12.7%; p = 0.064). The duration of antiviral prophylaxis was shorter in the immune-monitoring group (adjusted difference -26.0 days, 95%-CI -41.1 to -10.8 days, p < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
Immune monitoring resulted in a significant reduction of antiviral prophylaxis, but we were unable to establish noninferiority of this approach on the co-primary endpoint of CMV infection.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37738676
pii: 7280465
doi: 10.1093/cid/ciad575
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Investigateurs
Patrizia Amico
(P)
John-David Aubert
(JD)
Vanessa Banz
(V)
Sonja Beckmann
(S)
Guido Beldi
(G)
Christoph Berger
(C)
Ekaterine Berishvili
(E)
Annalisa Berzigotti
(A)
Isabelle Binet
(I)
Pierre-Yves Bochud
(PY)
Sanda Branca
(S)
Heiner Bucher
(H)
Emmanuelle Catana
(E)
Anne Cairoli
(A)
Yves Chalandon
(Y)
Sabina De Geest
(S)
Olivier De Rougemont
(O)
Sophie De Seigneux
(S)
Michael Dickenmann
(M)
Joëlle Lynn Dreifuss
(JL)
Michel Duchosal
(M)
Thomas Fehr
(T)
Sylvie Ferrari-Lacraz
(S)
Christian Garzoni
(C)
Déla Golshayan
(D)
Nicolas Goossens
(N)
Fadi Haidar
(F)
Jörg Halter
(J)
Dominik Heim
(D)
Christoph Hess
(C)
Sven Hillinger
(S)
Hans H Hirsch
(HH)
Patricia Hirt
(P)
Linard Hoessly
(L)
Günther Hofbauer
(G)
Uyen Huynh-Do
(U)
Franz Immer
(F)
Michael Koller
(M)
Bettina Laesser
(B)
Frédéric Lamoth
(F)
Roger Lehmann
(R)
Alexander Leichtle
(A)
Oriol Manuel
(O)
Hans-Peter Marti
(HP)
Michele Martinelli
(M)
Valérie McLin
(V)
Katell Mellac
(K)
Aurélia Merçay
(A)
Karin Mettler
(K)
Nicolas J Mueller
(NJ)
Ulrike Müller-Arndt
(U)
Beat Müllhaupt
(B)
Mirjam Nägeli
(M)
Graziano Oldani
(G)
Manuel Pascual
(M)
Jakob Passweg
(J)
Rosemarie Pazeller
(R)
Klara Posfay-Barbe
(K)
Juliane Rick
(J)
Anne Rosselet
(A)
Simona Rossi
(S)
Silvia Rothlin
(S)
Frank Ruschitzka
(F)
Thomas Schachtner
(T)
Stefan Schaub
(S)
Alexandra Scherrer
(A)
Aurelia Schnyder
(A)
Macé Schuurmans
(M)
Simon Schwab
(S)
Thierry Sengstag
(T)
Federico Simonetta
(F)
Susanne Stampf
(S)
Jürg Steiger
(J)
Guido Stirnimann
(G)
Ueli Stürzinger
(U)
Christian Van Delden
(C)
Jean-Pierre Venetz
(JP)
Jean Villard
(J)
Julien Vionnet
(J)
Madeleine Wick
(M)
Markus Wilhelm
(M)
Patrick Yerly
(P)
Informations de copyright
© The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America.