Perioperative Complications and Radiographic Outcomes Following Cervical Laminoplasty: A Review of 105 Cases from a Single Academic Center.

Laminoplasty Perioperative complications Radiographic outcome

Journal

World neurosurgery
ISSN: 1878-8769
Titre abrégé: World Neurosurg
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101528275

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
20 Sep 2023
Historique:
received: 01 03 2023
revised: 09 09 2023
accepted: 11 09 2023
pubmed: 23 9 2023
medline: 23 9 2023
entrez: 22 9 2023
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

To assess complications and to compare preoperative and postoperative radiographic measures in patients who underwent cervical laminoplasty. We evaluated patients undergoing cervical laminoplasty between 2011 and 2022 at an academic medical center. Patient demographics, intraoperative and postoperative complications, and preoperative and postoperative radiographic parameters were recorded. Of 150 patients undergoing cervical laminoplasty during 2011-2022, 105 met the inclusion criteria. We identified 22 (21.0%) adverse events in 20 patients: 4 intraoperative (3.8%), 10 perioperative (9.5%), and 8 delayed postoperative (7.6%). Among adverse events, 13 (12.4%) were judged to be minor and 9 (8.6%) were judged to be major complications. Revision surgery was required in 6 (5.7%) patients. Both preoperative and postoperative cervical spine radiographic imaging was available in 47 (44.8%) of the 105 patients. Mean preoperative and postoperative C2-7 Cobb angles were 14.7° and 12.3°, respectively (P = 0.04). Mean preoperative and postoperative sagittal vertical axis measurements were 29.2 mm and 33.3 mm, respectively (P = 0.07). Mean preoperative and postoperative T1 slopes were 32.3° and 30.2°, respectively (P = 0.07). Cervical laminoplasty carries a significant risk of adverse events, the majority of which are minor, and has a low rate of reoperation (5.7%). The procedure does not result in significant changes in sagittal vertical axis or T1 slope. Cervical laminoplasty remains a valuable surgical option for selected patients with cervical myelopathy.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37739170
pii: S1878-8750(23)01317-7
doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2023.09.049
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Auteurs

Serena E B Liu (SEB)

Department of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, New York, USA.

David Paul (D)

Department of Neurosurgery, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, New York, USA.

Amy Phan (A)

Department of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, New York, USA.

Shalin Shah (S)

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia, USA.

Howard Silberstein (H)

Department of Neurosurgery, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, New York, USA.

Varun Puvanesarajah (V)

Department of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, New York, USA.

Paul Rubery (P)

Department of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, New York, USA.

Addisu Mesfin (A)

Medstar Orthopaedic Institute/Georgetown University School of Medicine, Washington, DC, USA. Electronic address: amesfin@gmail.com.

Classifications MeSH