Comparison between the gut bacterial community of laboratory cultured and wild Daphnia.

daphnia magna gut bacterial community laboratory microbiota natural

Journal

FEMS microbiology ecology
ISSN: 1574-6941
Titre abrégé: FEMS Microbiol Ecol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 8901229

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
17 Oct 2023
Historique:
received: 03 04 2023
revised: 14 09 2023
accepted: 21 09 2023
pubmed: 23 9 2023
medline: 23 9 2023
entrez: 23 9 2023
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

The fitness of an organism is often impacted by the composition and biological activity of its associated bacterial community. Many factors, including host genetics, diet, and temperature can influence the bacterial community composition. Furthermore, these factors can differ strongly between natural and laboratory environments. Consequently, several studies have highlighted results from laboratory experiments investigating host-associated bacterial communities to be conflicting with those obtained under field conditions. Here, we compared the Daphnia magna gut bacterial communities in natural host populations with those of laboratory cultured hosts. We further analyzed changes in the gut bacterial communities after transferring hosts from natural populations to the laboratory on the short- and long-term. Results show that, in general, the gut bacterial communities from natural populations differ from those of laboratory cultures and that their composition and diversity changed one hour after being transferred to the laboratory. Over the following 14 days, the composition and diversity changed gradually. On the longer term (after two years of rearing hosts in the laboratory) the composition and diversity of the gut bacterial communities was strongly altered compared to the initial state. Our findings indicate that the gut bacterial communities of Daphnia magna in laboratory experiments is not representative for natural field conditions, and that caution should be taken when interpreting results from laboratory experiments for natural settings.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37740575
pii: 7280997
doi: 10.1093/femsec/fiad116
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Subventions

Organisme : KU Leuven
ID : C16/17/002
Organisme : FWO
ID : G092619N

Informations de copyright

© The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of FEMS.

Auteurs

Shira Houwenhuyse (S)

Laboratory of Aquatic Biology, Department of Biology, University of Leuven- KU Leuven, Campus KULAK, E. Sabbelaan 53, 8500 Kortrijk, Belgium.
Laboratory of Microbiology, Department of Biochemistry and Microbiology, Faculty of Sciences, Gent University, Karel Lodewijk Ledeganckstraat 35, 9000, Gent, Belgium.

Martijn Callens (M)

Laboratory of Aquatic Biology, Department of Biology, University of Leuven- KU Leuven, Campus KULAK, E. Sabbelaan 53, 8500 Kortrijk, Belgium.
Animal Sciences Unit - Aquatic Environment and Quality, Flanders Research Institute for Agriculture, Fisheries and Food, Oostende 8400, Belgium.

Lore Bulteel (L)

Laboratory of Aquatic Biology, Department of Biology, University of Leuven- KU Leuven, Campus KULAK, E. Sabbelaan 53, 8500 Kortrijk, Belgium.

Ellen Decaestecker (E)

Laboratory of Aquatic Biology, Department of Biology, University of Leuven- KU Leuven, Campus KULAK, E. Sabbelaan 53, 8500 Kortrijk, Belgium.

Classifications MeSH