Trade-offs between ligninase and cellulase and their effects on soil organic carbon in abandoned Moso bamboo forests in southeast China.

A vast expanse of Moso bamboo (Phyllostachys pubescens J.Houz.) forests in subtropical areas was once intensively managed but has been abandoned in recent years. However, the response of soil organic carbon (SOC) to abandonment management remains unclear, partly because how carbon-degrading enzymes vary with abandonment management and the role of this change in the soil carbon cycle are still poorly understood, which restricts the scientific evaluation of carbon sink benefits of these abandoned Moso bamboo forests. The results of the survey, based on 40 Moso bamboo forests, showed that compared with intensive management, abandonment management for 7-10 and 11-14 years exhibited a significant decrease in ligninase activities (a reduction of 12.14 % and 44.41 %, respectively) and a significant increase in SOC content (an increase of 49.39 % and 52.64 %, respectively). However, abandonment management did not affect cellulase activities or easily oxidizable organic carbon content (p > 0.05), but significantl increased non-easily oxidizable organic carbon (p < 0.05). Furthermore, the total nitrogen (TN) content and pH value increased with prolonged abandonment, and these trade-offs between ligninase and cellulase were primarily driven by pH and TN. The ligninase-to-cellulase activities ratio is the most key factor affecting NEOC and SOC changes in abandoned Moso bamboo forests. Together, these findings demonstrate the response of carbon-degrading enzyme trade-offs to abandonment management and highlight the role of these trade-offs in controlling SOC accumulation. In addition, the different responses of different SOC fractions to abandonment management deserve attention in future studies.

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2023 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Declaration of competing interest The authors declare to have no competing financial interests or personal relationships that could appear to influence the work reported in this paper.