Continuous aerosol monitoring and comparison of aerosol exposure based on smoke dispersion distance and concentrations during oxygenation therapy.
Journal
Scientific reports
ISSN: 2045-2322
Titre abrégé: Sci Rep
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101563288
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
23 09 2023
23 09 2023
Historique:
received:
16
02
2023
accepted:
15
09
2023
medline:
23
11
2023
pubmed:
24
9
2023
entrez:
23
9
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
This study evaluated the aerosol exposure risks while using common noninvasive oxygenation devices. A simulated mannequin was designed to breathe at a minute ventilation of 20 L/min and used the following oxygen-therapy devices: nasal cannula oxygenation (NCO) at 4 and 15 L/min, nonrebreathing mask (NRM) at 15 L/min, simple mask at 6 L/min, combination of NCO at 15 L/min and NRM at 15 L/min, high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) at 50 L/min, and flush rate NRM. Two-dimension of the dispersion distance and the aerosol concentrations were measured at head, trunk, and foot around the mannequin for over 10 min. HFNC and flush-rate NRM yielded the longest dispersion distance and highest aerosol concentrations over the three sites of the mannequin than the other oxygenation devices and should use with caution. For flow rates of < 15 L/min, oxygenation devices with mask-like effects, such as NRM or NCO with NRM, decreased aerosol dispersion more effectively than NCO alone or a simple mask. In the upright position, the foot area exhibited the highest aerosol concentration regardless of the oxygenation device than the head-trunk areas of the mannequin. Healthcare workers should be alert even at the foot side of the patient while administering oxygenation therapy.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37741874
doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-42909-1
pii: 10.1038/s41598-023-42909-1
pmc: PMC10517922
doi:
Substances chimiques
Smoke
0
Aerosols
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
15910Commentaires et corrections
Type : ErratumIn
Informations de copyright
© 2023. The Author(s).
Références
Am J Emerg Med. 2020 Oct;38(10):2243.e5-2243.e6
pubmed: 32471783
Crit Care. 2020 Apr 23;24(1):169
pubmed: 32326959
Ann Emerg Med. 2022 Jul;80(1):22-34
pubmed: 35469678
Eur Respir J. 2019 Apr 11;53(4):
pubmed: 30705129
CADTH Technol Overv. 2013;3(1):e3201
pubmed: 23463843
Can J Anaesth. 2020 Sep;67(9):1217-1248
pubmed: 32542464
Australas Emerg Care. 2021 Sep;24(3):235-239
pubmed: 33358480
Braz J Anesthesiol. 2022 Mar-Apr;72(2):291-301
pubmed: 34624372
Hong Kong Med J. 2014 Aug;20 Suppl 4:9-13
pubmed: 25224111
Science. 2021 Aug 27;373(6558):
pubmed: 34446582
BMC Pulm Med. 2016 Dec 1;16(1):169
pubmed: 27903260
Eur Respir J. 2020 May 14;55(5):
pubmed: 32299867
N Engl J Med. 2020 Apr 16;382(16):1564-1567
pubmed: 32182409
Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2020 Oct;24(19):10239-10246
pubmed: 33090435
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Jul 1;3(7):e2013807
pubmed: 32716517
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2020 Aug 15;202(4):P13-P14
pubmed: 32795140
Thorax. 2020 Sep;75(9):805-807
pubmed: 32522764
J Microbiol Biotechnol. 2020 Mar 28;30(3):313-324
pubmed: 32238757
Respir Care. 2005 May;50(5):604-9
pubmed: 15871753
Am J Emerg Med. 2017 Aug;35(8):1184-1189
pubmed: 28647137
Risk Anal. 2020 May;40(5):902-907
pubmed: 32356927
Infez Med. 2021 Mar 1;29(1):20-36
pubmed: 33664170
Am J Emerg Med. 2017 Oct;35(10):1542-1546
pubmed: 28684195
Intensive Care Med. 2019 May;45(5):563-572
pubmed: 30888444
Ann Emerg Med. 2017 Jan;69(1):1-6
pubmed: 27522310
Clin Infect Dis. 2020 Jul 28;71(15):841-843
pubmed: 32047895
J Aerosol Med. 1997 Summer;10(2):105-16
pubmed: 10168531
N Engl J Med. 2015 Jun 4;372(23):2185-96
pubmed: 25981908
Ann Emerg Med. 2018 Mar;71(3):381-386
pubmed: 29089172
Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2020 Oct;10(10):1173-1179
pubmed: 32652898