Poverty and population health - The need for A Paradigm shift to capture the working poor and better inform public health planning.
ALICE
Asset limited
Employed
Health disparities
Income constrained
Socioeconomic status
Working poor
Journal
Social science & medicine (1982)
ISSN: 1873-5347
Titre abrégé: Soc Sci Med
Pays: England
ID NLM: 8303205
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
11 2023
11 2023
Historique:
received:
19
06
2023
revised:
18
08
2023
accepted:
14
09
2023
medline:
23
10
2023
pubmed:
25
9
2023
entrez:
24
9
2023
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Community-level socioeconomic disparities have a significant impact on an individual's health and overall well-being. However, current estimates for poverty threshold, which are often used to assess community-level socioeconomic status, do not account for cost-of-living differences or geography variability. The goals of this study were to compare geographic county-level overlap and gaps in access to care for households within poverty and working poor designations. Data were obtained for 21 continental United States (US) states from the United Way's Asset Limited, Income Constrained, Employed (ALICE) households for 2021. Raw data contained the percentage of households at the federal poverty level, the percentage of households at the ALICE designations (working poor), and the total households at the county level. Local Moran's I tests for spatial autocorrelation were performed to identify the clustering of poverty and ALICE households. These clusters were overlaid with a 30-min drive time from critical access hospitals' physical addresses. County-level clusters of ALICE (working poor) households occurred in different areas than the clustering of poverty households. Of particular interest, the extent to which the 30-min drive time to critical care overlapped with clusters of ALICE or poverty changed depending on the state. Overall, clustering in ALICE and poverty overlapped with 30-min drive times to critical care between 46 and 90% of the time. However, the specific states where disparities in access to care were prominent differed between analyses focused on households in poverty versus the working poor. Findings highlight a disparity in equitable inclusion of individuals across the spectrum of socioeconomic status. Furthermore, they suggest that current public health programming and benefits which support low socioeconomic populations may be missing a vulnerable sub-population of working families. Future studies are needed to better understand how to address the health disparities facing individuals who are above the poverty threshold but still struggle economically to meet based needs.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Community-level socioeconomic disparities have a significant impact on an individual's health and overall well-being. However, current estimates for poverty threshold, which are often used to assess community-level socioeconomic status, do not account for cost-of-living differences or geography variability. The goals of this study were to compare geographic county-level overlap and gaps in access to care for households within poverty and working poor designations.
METHODS
Data were obtained for 21 continental United States (US) states from the United Way's Asset Limited, Income Constrained, Employed (ALICE) households for 2021. Raw data contained the percentage of households at the federal poverty level, the percentage of households at the ALICE designations (working poor), and the total households at the county level. Local Moran's I tests for spatial autocorrelation were performed to identify the clustering of poverty and ALICE households. These clusters were overlaid with a 30-min drive time from critical access hospitals' physical addresses.
FINDINGS
County-level clusters of ALICE (working poor) households occurred in different areas than the clustering of poverty households. Of particular interest, the extent to which the 30-min drive time to critical care overlapped with clusters of ALICE or poverty changed depending on the state. Overall, clustering in ALICE and poverty overlapped with 30-min drive times to critical care between 46 and 90% of the time. However, the specific states where disparities in access to care were prominent differed between analyses focused on households in poverty versus the working poor.
INTERPRETATIONS
Findings highlight a disparity in equitable inclusion of individuals across the spectrum of socioeconomic status. Furthermore, they suggest that current public health programming and benefits which support low socioeconomic populations may be missing a vulnerable sub-population of working families. Future studies are needed to better understand how to address the health disparities facing individuals who are above the poverty threshold but still struggle economically to meet based needs.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37742541
pii: S0277-9536(23)00606-8
doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2023.116249
pmc: PMC10701684
mid: NIHMS1935700
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
116249Subventions
Organisme : NIMHD NIH HHS
ID : U01 MD017419
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIGMS NIH HHS
ID : U54 GM104942
Pays : United States
Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.
Références
Appl Spat Anal Policy. 2023;16(1):141-161
pubmed: 35967757
Int J Health Geogr. 2019 Mar 27;18(1):6
pubmed: 30917821
Rural Sociol. 2019 Mar;84(1):28-65
pubmed: 31057185
Public Health Rep. 2017 Jul/Aug;132(4):431-435
pubmed: 28538109
Milbank Q. 2004;82(1):101-24
pubmed: 15016245
Am J Public Health. 2010 Apr 1;100 Suppl 1:S186-96
pubmed: 20147693
JAMA. 2010 Mar 24;303(12):1159-66
pubmed: 20332401
J Public Health Manag Pract. 2016 Jan-Feb;22 Suppl 1:S33-42
pubmed: 26599027
JAMA. 2011 Jul 6;306(1):45-52
pubmed: 21730240
Lancet. 2017 Mar 25;389(10075):1229-1237
pubmed: 28159391
Urban Stud. 2012;49(3):563-85
pubmed: 22512042
Prev Med. 2018 Aug;113:15-31
pubmed: 29752959
PLoS One. 2015 Dec 31;10(12):e0144429
pubmed: 26720311