Perception of Goals and Expected Outcomes in Older Hip Fracture Patients and Their Medical Staff: A Cross Sectional Study.

communication goal-oriented healthcare hip fracture older adults patient reported outcomes rehabilitation

Journal

Geriatric orthopaedic surgery & rehabilitation
ISSN: 2151-4585
Titre abrégé: Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101558150

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2023
Historique:
medline: 25 9 2023
pubmed: 25 9 2023
entrez: 25 9 2023
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Goal-oriented patientcare is a key element in qualityhealthcare. Medical-caregiver's (MC) are expected to generate a shared decision-making process with patients regarding goals and expected health-outcomes. Hip-fracture patients (HFP) are usually older-adults with multiple health-conditions, necessitating that agreed-upon goals regarding the rehabilitation process, take these conditions into consideration. This topic has yet to be investigated by pairing and comparing the perception of expected outcomes and therapeutic goals of multidisciplinary MCs and their HF patient's. Our aim was to assess in a quantitative method whether HFPs and their multidisciplinary MCs agree upon target health-outcomes and their most important goals as they are reflected in the SF12 questionnaire. This was a cross-sectional, multi-center, study of HFPs and their MCs. Patients and MCs were asked to rate their top three most important goals for rehabilitation from the SF12 eight subscales: physical functioning, physical role limitation, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, emotional role limitation and mental health, and indicate their expected outcome. Descriptive statistics and mixed effect logistic-regression were used to compare concordance of the ratings. Agreement between patients and MCs was assessed using interclass coefficients (ICCs). A total of 378 ratings were collected from 52 patients, 12 nurses, 12 physicians and 6 paramedical personnel. Each patient had between 3 and 9 raters. Patients considered physical functioning and physical role limitation more important than did MCs. Physicians and nurses emphasized the importance of bodily pain while patients referred to it as relatively less significant. The total ICC was low (2%) indicating poor agreement between MCs and patients. With the exception of physical-functioning, MCs predicted a less optimistic outcome in all of the SF12's subscales in comparison to HFPs. Effective intervention in HFPs requires constructive communication between MCs and patients. The study suggests that caregivers have an insufficient understanding of the expectations of HFPs. More effective communication channels are required in order to better understand HFPs' needs and expectations.

Sections du résumé

Background UNASSIGNED
Goal-oriented patientcare is a key element in qualityhealthcare. Medical-caregiver's (MC) are expected to generate a shared decision-making process with patients regarding goals and expected health-outcomes. Hip-fracture patients (HFP) are usually older-adults with multiple health-conditions, necessitating that agreed-upon goals regarding the rehabilitation process, take these conditions into consideration. This topic has yet to be investigated by pairing and comparing the perception of expected outcomes and therapeutic goals of multidisciplinary MCs and their HF patient's. Our aim was to assess in a quantitative method whether HFPs and their multidisciplinary MCs agree upon target health-outcomes and their most important goals as they are reflected in the SF12 questionnaire.
Methods UNASSIGNED
This was a cross-sectional, multi-center, study of HFPs and their MCs. Patients and MCs were asked to rate their top three most important goals for rehabilitation from the SF12 eight subscales: physical functioning, physical role limitation, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, emotional role limitation and mental health, and indicate their expected outcome. Descriptive statistics and mixed effect logistic-regression were used to compare concordance of the ratings. Agreement between patients and MCs was assessed using interclass coefficients (ICCs).
Results UNASSIGNED
A total of 378 ratings were collected from 52 patients, 12 nurses, 12 physicians and 6 paramedical personnel. Each patient had between 3 and 9 raters. Patients considered physical functioning and physical role limitation more important than did MCs. Physicians and nurses emphasized the importance of bodily pain while patients referred to it as relatively less significant. The total ICC was low (2%) indicating poor agreement between MCs and patients. With the exception of physical-functioning, MCs predicted a less optimistic outcome in all of the SF12's subscales in comparison to HFPs.
Conclusion UNASSIGNED
Effective intervention in HFPs requires constructive communication between MCs and patients. The study suggests that caregivers have an insufficient understanding of the expectations of HFPs. More effective communication channels are required in order to better understand HFPs' needs and expectations.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37744458
doi: 10.1177/21514593231202735
pii: 10.1177_21514593231202735
pmc: PMC10517609
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

21514593231202735

Informations de copyright

© The Author(s) 2023.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Références

Front Neurol. 2018 Jan 11;8:729
pubmed: 29375468
J Knee Surg. 2021 May;34(6):612-620
pubmed: 31639850
Int J Qual Stud Health Well-being. 2017 Dec;12(1):1307061
pubmed: 28367700
Isr J Health Policy Res. 2018 Aug 2;7(1):38
pubmed: 30068383
Disabil Rehabil. 2010;32(6):492-9
pubmed: 19852716
J Arthroplasty. 2018 Apr;33(4):1094-1100
pubmed: 29276119
Med Care. 1992 Jun;30(6):473-83
pubmed: 1593914
ISRN Nurs. 2012;2012:863291
pubmed: 22811933
Int J Orthop Trauma Nurs. 2017 Feb;24:50-58
pubmed: 27554953
Bone Joint J. 2017 Sep;99-B(9):1190-1196
pubmed: 28860399
SAGE Open Med. 2018 Sep 07;6:2050312118799121
pubmed: 30210796
Int J Orthop Trauma Nurs. 2021 Apr;41:100811
pubmed: 33288442
Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil. 2018 Nov 21;9:2151459318806442
pubmed: 30479849
Int J Orthop Trauma Nurs. 2020 Aug;38:100778
pubmed: 32595058
J Gen Intern Med. 2003 Nov;18(11):893-902
pubmed: 14687274
Med Decis Making. 2015 May;35(4):539-57
pubmed: 25145577
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2002 Jul 1;27(13):1465-70
pubmed: 12131748
BJS Open. 2020 Feb;4(1):16-26
pubmed: 32011813
Inquiry. 2023 Jan-Dec;60:469580231171819
pubmed: 37183709
Comput Biol Med. 1989;19(1):61-70
pubmed: 2917462
Am J Med Qual. 2011 Nov-Dec;26(6):461-7
pubmed: 21450939
Disabil Rehabil. 2021 May;43(9):1247-1254
pubmed: 31442079
Phys Ther. 2003 Mar;83(3):224-36
pubmed: 12620087
Rehabil Nurs. 2009 May-Jun;34(3):110-7
pubmed: 19475806
Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil. 2012 Jun;3(2):59-67
pubmed: 23569698
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010 Jan 20;(1):CD007624
pubmed: 20091644
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Sep 10;18(1):701
pubmed: 30200950
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009 Jul 1;34(15):1590-9
pubmed: 19521272
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2007 Mar;55(3):407-13
pubmed: 17341244
Disabil Rehabil. 2012;34(26):2234-41
pubmed: 22587621
Eur Spine J. 2009 Mar;18(3):419-29
pubmed: 19132411
Health Expect. 2003 Mar;6(1):19-29
pubmed: 12603625
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2012 Jul;94(7):974-81
pubmed: 22733956
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2015 Oct 7;97(19):1628-34
pubmed: 26446970
Med Care. 1998 Sep;36(9):1361-70
pubmed: 9749659
J Telemed Telecare. 2017 Oct;23(9):780-785
pubmed: 28027678
Qual Saf Health Care. 2010 Jun;19(3):195-9
pubmed: 20430931
BMJ. 2017 Feb 20;356:j816
pubmed: 28219884
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011 Mar 16;(3):CD001704
pubmed: 21412873
J Knee Surg. 2020 Oct;33(10):1034-1040
pubmed: 31272124
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2019 Jul;67(7):1342-1344
pubmed: 30882888
Can J Neurol Sci. 2013 Mar;40(2):210-8
pubmed: 23419570
Global Spine J. 2021 Apr;11(3):331-337
pubmed: 32875885
Bone Joint J. 2017 Sep;99-B(9):1121-1122
pubmed: 28860388
CMAJ. 1995 May 1;152(9):1423-33
pubmed: 7728691
Am Fam Physician. 2003 Feb 1;67(3):537-42
pubmed: 12588076
Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil. 2019 Jun 06;10:2151459319841743
pubmed: 31218092
Disabil Rehabil. 2022 Mar;44(6):940-947
pubmed: 32609547

Auteurs

Hanna S Schroeder (HS)

Department of Nursing at the Faculty of Medicine, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel.
Braun School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel.

Avi Israeli (A)

Dr. Julien Rozan Professor of Healthcare, Hebrew University - Hadassah Medical School, Jerusalem, Israel.
Hadassah University Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel.
Israel Ministry of Health, Jerusalem, Israel.

Meir Iri Liebergall (MI)

Orthopedic Department of Surgery, Hadassah Medical Center, Hebrew University, Jerusalem, Israel.

Omer Or (O)

Orthopedic Department of Surgery, Hadassah Medical Center, Hebrew University, Jerusalem, Israel.

Wiessam Abu Ahmed (W)

Braun School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel.

Ora Paltiel (O)

Braun School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel.

Dan Justo (D)

Geriatrics Division, Sheba Medical Center, Ramat-Gan, Israel.
Sackler School of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel.

Eyal Zimlichman (E)

Sackler School of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel.
Central Management, Sheba Medical Center, Ramat-Gan, Israel.

Classifications MeSH