Cost-effectiveness of the Perioperative Pain Management Bundle a registry-based study.
Bundle
acute postoperative pain
cost-effectiveness
cost-effectiveness plane
economic preference analysis
incremental cost-effectiveness ratio
international pain outcomes questionnaire
pain composite score
Journal
Frontiers in public health
ISSN: 2296-2565
Titre abrégé: Front Public Health
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101616579
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2023
2023
Historique:
received:
02
02
2023
accepted:
18
08
2023
medline:
26
9
2023
pubmed:
25
9
2023
entrez:
25
9
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The Perioperative Pain Management Bundle was introduced in 10 Serbian PAIN OUT network hospitals to improve the quality of postoperative pain management. The Bundle consists of 4 elements: informing patients about postoperative pain treatment options; administering a full daily dose of 1-2 non-opioid analgesics; administering regional blocks and/or surgical wound infiltration; and assessing pain after surgery. In this study, we aimed to assess the cost-effectiveness of the Bundle during the initial 24 h after surgery. The assessment of cost-effectiveness was carried out by comparing patients before and after Bundle implementation and by comparing patients who received all Bundle elements to those with no Bundle element. Costs of postoperative pain management included costs of the analgesic medications, costs of labor for administering these medications, and related disposable materials. A multidimensional Pain Composite Score (PCS), the effectiveness measurement, was obtained by averaging variables from the International Pain Outcomes questionnaire evaluating pain intensity, interference of pain with activities and emotions, and side effects of analgesic medications. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was calculated as the incremental change in costs divided by the incremental change in PCS and plotted on the cost-effectiveness plane along with the economic preference analysis. The ICER value calculated when comparing patients before and after Bundle implementation was 181.89 RSD (1.55 EUR) with plotted ICERs located in the northeast and southeast quadrants of the cost-effectiveness plane. However, when comparing patients with no Bundle elements and those with all four Bundle elements, the calculated ICER was -800.63 RSD (-6.82 EUR) with plotted ICERs located in the southeast quadrant of the cost-effectiveness plane. ICER values differ across surgical disciplines. The proposed perioperative pain management Bundle is cost-effective. The cost-effectiveness varies depending on the number of implemented Bundle elements and fluctuates across surgical disciplines.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37744520
doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1157484
pmc: PMC10513912
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1157484Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2023 Bojic, Ladjevic, Palibrk, Soldatovic, Likic-Ladjevic, Meissner, Zaslansky, Stamer, Baumbach and Stamenkovic.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Références
J Clin Anesth. 2004 May;16(3):159-67
pubmed: 15217653
J Comp Eff Res. 2021 Oct;10(15):1107-1119
pubmed: 34240625
J Clin Med. 2023 Jan 14;12(2):
pubmed: 36675605
Eur J Pain. 2022 Nov;26(10):2188-2197
pubmed: 36069125
Eur J Pain. 2022 Sep;26(8):1732-1745
pubmed: 35762292
J Pain. 2013 Nov;14(11):1361-70
pubmed: 24021577
Pain Res Manag. 2021 May 4;2021:2542010
pubmed: 34055117
Clin J Pain. 2023 Oct 01;39(10):537-545
pubmed: 37589465
Korean J Anesthesiol. 2012 Jun;62(6):548-51
pubmed: 22778891
Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2018 May;35(5):402-404
pubmed: 29601421
Trials. 2018 Jan 04;19(1):8
pubmed: 29301556
World Neurosurg. 2018 Feb;110:e599-e604
pubmed: 29175573
J Clin Anesth. 2019 Mar;53:56-63
pubmed: 30326379
J Pain Res. 2017 Sep 25;10:2287-2298
pubmed: 29026331
Bone Joint J. 2018 Jan;100-B(1 Supple A):55-61
pubmed: 29292341
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Jan 28;17(3):
pubmed: 32012977
Med Decis Making. 1990 Jul-Sep;10(3):212-4
pubmed: 2115096
Anesth Pain Med. 2018 Nov 17;8(6):e81366
pubmed: 30719413
Afr Health Sci. 2019 Dec;19(4):3127-3135
pubmed: 32127889
Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2019 May;44(5):565-572
pubmed: 30867279
BMJ Open. 2020 Nov 20;10(11):e041176
pubmed: 33444208
Br J Anaesth. 2021 Jun;126(6):1182-1191
pubmed: 33685632
Paediatr Anaesth. 2018 Mar;28(3):237-248
pubmed: 29377376
Singapore Med J. 2018 May;59(5):264-270
pubmed: 28805235
Eur J Pain. 2015 Apr;19(4):490-502
pubmed: 25132607
JAMA Surg. 2022 Jun 1;157(6):481-489
pubmed: 35385072
Pain. 2021 Jul 1;162(7):1899-1905
pubmed: 33449513
Curr Med Res Opin. 2022 Jan;38(1):115-121
pubmed: 34641744
Crit Care Med. 2021 Nov 1;49(11):1974-1982
pubmed: 34643578
J Perianesth Nurs. 2019 Feb;34(1):124-131
pubmed: 29735341
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2019 Jan;25(1):20-25
pubmed: 29625170
Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2004 Dec;4(6):599-601
pubmed: 19807531
Ann Surg. 2020 Jan;271(1):23-28
pubmed: 30601252
J Stat Theory Pract. 2012;6(3):428-442
pubmed: 23441022