These Aren't The Droids You Are Looking for: Promises and Challenges for the Intersection of Affective Science and Robotics/AI.
Affective computing
Artificial intelligence
Human robot interaction
Robotics
Journal
Affective science
ISSN: 2662-205X
Titre abrégé: Affect Sci
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101766948
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Sep 2023
Sep 2023
Historique:
received:
06
02
2023
accepted:
19
07
2023
medline:
25
9
2023
pubmed:
25
9
2023
entrez:
25
9
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
AI research focused on interactions with humans, particularly in the form of robots or virtual agents, has expanded in the last two decades to include concepts related to affective processes. Affective computing is an emerging field that deals with issues such as how the diagnosis of affective states of users can be used to improve such interactions, also with a view to demonstrate affective behavior towards the user. This type of research often is based on two beliefs: (1) artificial emotional intelligence will improve human computer interaction (or more specifically human robot interaction), and (2) we understand the role of affective behavior in human interaction sufficiently to tell artificial systems what to do. However, within affective science the focus of research is often to test a particular assumption, such as "smiles affect liking." Such focus does not provide the information necessary to synthesize affective behavior in long dynamic and real-time interactions. In consequence, theories do not play a large role in the development of artificial affective systems by engineers, but self-learning systems develop their behavior out of large corpora of recorded interactions. The status quo is characterized by measurement issues, theoretical lacunae regarding prevalence and functions of affective behavior in interaction, and underpowered studies that cannot provide the solid empirical foundation for further theoretical developments. This contribution will highlight some of these challenges and point towards next steps to create a rapprochement between engineers and affective scientists with a view to improving theory and solid applications.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37744970
doi: 10.1007/s42761-023-00211-3
pii: 211
pmc: PMC10514249
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Review
Langues
eng
Pagination
580-585Informations de copyright
© The Author(s) 2023.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Conflicts of InterestThe authors declare no competing interests.
Références
Biol Psychol. 1991 Feb;32(1):3-100
pubmed: 1742403
Biol Psychol. 1994 Oct;38(2-3):95-115
pubmed: 7873704
Top Cogn Sci. 2019 Jan;11(1):50-74
pubmed: 28940761
Front Psychol. 2017 Oct 04;8:1684
pubmed: 29046652
Nat Hum Behav. 2021 Jul;5(7):816-820
pubmed: 34112980
Br J Psychol. 2018 Aug;109(3):395-417
pubmed: 29504117
Emotion. 2005 Jun;5(2):175-90
pubmed: 15982083
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2022 Nov;17(6):1566-1575
pubmed: 35712993
NPJ Digit Med. 2022 Feb 17;5(1):21
pubmed: 35177772
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014 Jun 17;111(24):8788-90
pubmed: 24889601
Front Artif Intell. 2021 Jul 15;4:654924
pubmed: 34337392
Cognition. 2017 Mar;160:43-50
pubmed: 28043026
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2014 Jan;106(1):73-88
pubmed: 24079297
Neuropsychologia. 2006;44(5):718-30
pubmed: 16171833
Psychol Sci Public Interest. 2019 Jul;20(1):1-68
pubmed: 31313636
Front Psychol. 2012 Nov 02;3:471
pubmed: 23130011