Adjuvant Hyperthermic Intravesical Chemotherapy in Intermediate- and High-Risk Non-muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer.
adjuvant intravesical chemotherapy
bacillus calmette-guérin
hyperthermic intravesical chemotherapy
mitomycin c
non-muscle invasive bladder cancer
Journal
Cureus
ISSN: 2168-8184
Titre abrégé: Cureus
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101596737
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Sep 2023
Sep 2023
Historique:
accepted:
20
09
2023
medline:
25
9
2023
pubmed:
25
9
2023
entrez:
25
9
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) is a frequently diagnosed neoplasm, which is typically managed with transurethral resection of bladder tumor (TURBT) eventually followed by intravesical therapies. Bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) is used as first-line adjuvant treatment in high- (HR) and intermediate-risk (IR) NMIBC, although, in the latter, mitomycin C (MMC) may also be used. Multiple limitations to the use of BCG encouraged the search for therapeutic alternatives. In this context, hyperthermic intravesical chemotherapy with MMC (HIVEC-MMC) emerged as a promising therapy in the adjuvant setting for NMIBC. The aim of our study was to evaluate the tolerability, compliance, and survival outcomes of HIVEC-MMC in patients with IR- and HR-NMIBC. This was a single-center retrospective analysis of IR- and HR- NMIBC patients who received HIVEC-MMC after TURBT between August 2018 and August 2022. Levels of risk stratification were defined using the European Association of Urology (EAU) criteria. The protocol consisted of four weekly HIVEC-MMC instillations (induction) followed by six monthly instillations (maintenance). The primary outcomes were to evaluate the tolerability and compliance with the HIVEC-MMC protocol and secondary outcomes were disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS). For the purpose of statistical analysis, methods of descriptive statistics, survival analysis (Kaplan-Meier estimation), and multivariate analysis (Cox regression, and binary logistic regression) were used. Fifty-seven patients were enrolled with a median age of 67.9 (34.4-83.5) years old. In this cohort, 40 patients (70.2%) had primary tumors. At the time of referral for HIVEC-MMC, the majority of the patients had IR-NMIBC (n= 33, 57.9%). A total of 41 patients (71.9%) completed the HIVEC-MMC protocol. Disease recurrence and adverse events (AEs) were the most common reasons to stop the protocol. After a median follow-up of 31 months (95% CI, 5.0-54.0), 32 patients (61.4%) were disease-free, 22 (38.6%) experienced recurrent disease and six patients (10.5%) died, although only one death was directly attributable to bladder cancer. The median DFS was 42 months (95% CI, 28.0-56.0). Completion of the HIVEC-MMC maintenance phase protocol stood as a predictive factor for DFS (44 months, 95% CI 29.1-58.9 vs. 14 months, 95% CI 0.0-29.6, p < 0.001; HR 4.48, 95% CI 1.65-12.15). The median OS was not reached; the 24- and 48-month OS were 92.6% and 82.7%, respectively. EAU risk group, ECOG-PS, and completion of HIVEC protocol were found to be significant predictive factors of OS but lost their significance on multivariate analysis. However, if we exclude those who experienced recurrence during the maintenance phase protocol, treatment completion had a significant positive impact on OS (HR: 42.8, 95% CI 1.75-1045.072, p= 0.021). Our study suggests that HIVEC is a secure and well-tolerated treatment with promising efficacy data, making this therapeutic approach a feasible option in IR- and HR-NMIBC patients, mainly in those who cannot tolerate or have contraindications to BCG therapy, but also as an alternative during BCG shortages.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37745737
doi: 10.7759/cureus.45672
pmc: PMC10512434
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
e45672Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2023, Magalhães et al.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Références
J Clin Med. 2021 Oct 30;10(21):
pubmed: 34768625
Urol Ann. 2021 Oct-Dec;13(4):424-430
pubmed: 34759657
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2023 Aug;149(10):7453-7459
pubmed: 36952006
BJUI Compass. 2022 Dec 02;4(3):314-321
pubmed: 37025474
J Oncol. 2019 Mar 10;2019:6230409
pubmed: 30984262
Eur Urol. 2016 Jan;69(1):60-9
pubmed: 26210894
Cent European J Urol. 2020;73(3):287-294
pubmed: 33133655
World J Urol. 2022 Apr;40(4):999-1004
pubmed: 35037963
Cancer Treat Rev. 2016 Jun;47:22-31
pubmed: 27231966
CA Cancer J Clin. 2018 Nov;68(6):394-424
pubmed: 30207593
Int J Hyperthermia. 2016 Jun;32(4):374-80
pubmed: 26915466
Immunotargets Ther. 2020 Feb 13;9:1-11
pubmed: 32104666
Eur Urol. 2023 Jun;83(6):497-504
pubmed: 35999119
Scand J Urol. 2021 Aug;55(4):281-286
pubmed: 34124993
Eur Urol. 2006 Mar;49(3):466-5; discussion 475-7
pubmed: 16442208
Eur Urol. 2016 Mar;69(3):438-47
pubmed: 26508308
Nat Rev Urol. 2018 Nov;15(11):667-685
pubmed: 30254383