The Clinical Outcomes of Spinal Accessory to Suprascapular Nerve Transfer Through a Posterior Approach.

nerve injury nerve transfer posterior spinal accessory nerve suprascapular nerve

Journal

Hand (New York, N.Y.)
ISSN: 1558-9455
Titre abrégé: Hand (N Y)
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101264149

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
25 Sep 2023
Historique:
pubmed: 25 9 2023
medline: 25 9 2023
entrez: 25 9 2023
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

Spinal accessory nerve (SAN) to suprascapular nerve (SSN) transfer can restore function to the rotator cuff following brachial plexus injuries. The traditional anterior approach using the lateral branch of the SAN causes denervation of the lateral trapezius limiting shoulder elevation. Suprascapular nerve pathology at the suprascapular notch may be missed resulting in poor reinnervation of the rotator cuff. The posterior approach uses the medial SAN and allows decompression and visualization of the SSN at the notch and nerve transfer coaptation closer to the target muscles with a shorter reinnervation distance. This is a review of 28 patients from 2014 to February 2020 who underwent SAN to SSN nerve transfer via a posterior approach. Patients were evaluated for SSN pathology, external rotation power, and range of motion. Data were evaluated for high-energy trauma (HET) and low-energy trauma/nontraumatic etiology subsets. A total of 8 HET (40%) patients had pathology identified at the suprascapular notch during the posterior approach, including SSN scarring, ruptures, neuromata-in-continuity, and ossification of ligaments. British Medical Research Council grade greater than or equal to 4 shoulder external rotation was achieved in 75% patients with median range of motion 137.5°. Spinal accessory nerve to SSN transfer using a posterior approach allows visualization of pathology involving the SSN and coaptation of a medial SAN transfer close to the target muscles. Following HET, 8 cases (40%) had posterior pathology identified. Spinal accessory nerve to SSN transfer through a posterior approach shows improved external rotation power and range of motion.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND UNASSIGNED
Spinal accessory nerve (SAN) to suprascapular nerve (SSN) transfer can restore function to the rotator cuff following brachial plexus injuries. The traditional anterior approach using the lateral branch of the SAN causes denervation of the lateral trapezius limiting shoulder elevation. Suprascapular nerve pathology at the suprascapular notch may be missed resulting in poor reinnervation of the rotator cuff. The posterior approach uses the medial SAN and allows decompression and visualization of the SSN at the notch and nerve transfer coaptation closer to the target muscles with a shorter reinnervation distance.
METHODS UNASSIGNED
This is a review of 28 patients from 2014 to February 2020 who underwent SAN to SSN nerve transfer via a posterior approach. Patients were evaluated for SSN pathology, external rotation power, and range of motion. Data were evaluated for high-energy trauma (HET) and low-energy trauma/nontraumatic etiology subsets.
RESULTS UNASSIGNED
A total of 8 HET (40%) patients had pathology identified at the suprascapular notch during the posterior approach, including SSN scarring, ruptures, neuromata-in-continuity, and ossification of ligaments. British Medical Research Council grade greater than or equal to 4 shoulder external rotation was achieved in 75% patients with median range of motion 137.5°.
CONCLUSIONS UNASSIGNED
Spinal accessory nerve to SSN transfer using a posterior approach allows visualization of pathology involving the SSN and coaptation of a medial SAN transfer close to the target muscles. Following HET, 8 cases (40%) had posterior pathology identified. Spinal accessory nerve to SSN transfer through a posterior approach shows improved external rotation power and range of motion.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37746731
doi: 10.1177/15589447231199797
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

15589447231199797

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Declaration of Conflicting InterestsThe author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Auteurs

Devanshi T Jimulia (DT)

Brachial Plexus and Peripheral Nerve Injury Service, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, UK.
HaPPeN Research Network, Birmingham, UK.

Liron S Duraku (LS)

Brachial Plexus and Peripheral Nerve Injury Service, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, UK.
HaPPeN Research Network, Birmingham, UK.
Department of Plastic, Reconstructive and Hand Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, The Netherlands.

Jvalant N Parekh (JN)

Brachial Plexus and Peripheral Nerve Injury Service, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, UK.

Samuel George (S)

Brachial Plexus and Peripheral Nerve Injury Service, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, UK.
HaPPeN Research Network, Birmingham, UK.

Tahseen Chaudhry (T)

Brachial Plexus and Peripheral Nerve Injury Service, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, UK.
HaPPeN Research Network, Birmingham, UK.

Dominic M Power (DM)

Brachial Plexus and Peripheral Nerve Injury Service, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, UK.
HaPPeN Research Network, Birmingham, UK.

Classifications MeSH