Efficacy and safety of an alternative onabotulinumtoxinA injection paradigm for refractory overactive bladder.
botulinum toxin type A
clean intermittent catheterization
injection
overactive bladder
urinary incontinence
Journal
Neurourology and urodynamics
ISSN: 1520-6777
Titre abrégé: Neurourol Urodyn
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 8303326
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
25 Sep 2023
25 Sep 2023
Historique:
revised:
05
09
2023
received:
12
06
2023
accepted:
13
09
2023
medline:
25
9
2023
pubmed:
25
9
2023
entrez:
25
9
2023
Statut:
aheadofprint
Résumé
In studies utilizing a 20-injection-site paradigm of onabotulinumtoxinA treatment for overactive bladder (OAB), some patients performed clean intermittent catheterization (CIC). An alternative injection paradigm of fewer injections targeting the lower bladder may reduce the need for CIC by maintaining upper bladder function. This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of an unapproved alternative 10-injection-site paradigm targeting the lower bladder. In this phase 4, double-blind, parallel-group study, patients with OAB and urinary incontinence (UI) for ≥6 months with ≥3 episodes of urinary urgency incontinence (no more than 1 UI-free day) and ≥8 micturitions per day over 3 days during screening were randomized 2:1 to onabotulinumtoxinA 100 U or placebo injected at 10 sites in the lower bladder. Of 120 patients, 78 in the onabotulinumtoxinA group and 39 in the placebo group had efficacy assessments. In the double-blind phase, mean change from baseline at week 12 in daily frequency of UI episodes was greater with onabotulinumtoxinA (-2.9) versus placebo (-0.3) (least squares mean difference [LSMD]: -2.99, p < 0.0001). Achievement of 100% (odds ratio [OR]: 6.15 [95% confidence interval, CI: 0.75-50.37]), ≥75% (OR: 7.25 [2.00-26.29]), and ≥50% improvement (OR: 4.79 [1.87-12.28]) from baseline in UI episodes was greater with onabotulinumtoxinA versus placebo. Reductions from baseline in the daily average number of micturitions (LSMD: -2.24, p < 0.0001), nocturia (LSMD: -0.71, p = 0.0004), and urgency (LSMD: -2.56, p < 0.0001) were greater with onabotulinumtoxinA than with placebo. Treatment benefit was improved or greatly improved in the onabotulinumtoxinA group (74.0% of patients) versus placebo (17.6%) (OR: 13.03 [95% CI: 3.23-52.57]). Mean change from baseline in Incontinence Quality of Life score was greater with onabotulinumtoxinA versus placebo (LSMD: 24.2, p = 0.0012). Two of 78 (2.6%) patients in the onabotulinumtoxinA group used CIC during the double-blind period; no females used CIC during the double-blind period. Commonly reported adverse events (≥5%) were urinary tract infection (UTI), dysuria, and productive cough for both groups; rate of UTI was higher with onabotulinumtoxinA versus placebo. In patients treated with onabotulinumtoxinA for OAB with UI, an unapproved alternative injection paradigm targeting the lower bladder demonstrated efficacy over placebo, with a low incidence of CIC.
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Subventions
Organisme : AbbVie
Informations de copyright
© 2023 The Authors. Neurourology and Urodynamics published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.
Références
Milsom I, Kaplan SA, Coyne KS, Sexton CC, Kopp ZS. Effect of bothersome overactive bladder symptoms on health-related quality of life, anxiety, depression, and treatment seeking in the United States: results from EpiLUTS. Urology. 2012;80(1):90-96.
Stewart W, Van Rooyen J, Cundiff G, et al. Prevalence and burden of overactive bladder in the United States. World J Urol. 2003;20:327-336.
Coyne KS, Sexton CC, Irwin DE, Kopp ZS, Kelleher CJ, Milsom I. The impact of overactive bladder, incontinence and other lower urinary tract symptoms on quality of life, work productivity, sexuality and emotional well-being in men and women: results from the EPIC study. BJU Int. 2008;101(11):1388-1395.
Fontaine C, Papworth E, Pascoe J, Hashim H. Update on the management of overactive bladder. Ther Adv Urol. 2021;13:175628722110390.
Gormley EA, Lightner DJ, Faraday M, Vasavada SP. Diagnosis and treatment of overactive bladder (non-neurogenic) in adults: AUA/SUFU guideline amendment. J Urol. 2015;193(5):1572-1580.
Botox [package insert]. Allergan; 2021.
Nitti VW, Dmochowski R, Herschorn S, et al. OnabotulinumtoxinA for the treatment of patients with overactive bladder and urinary incontinence: results of a phase 3, randomized, placebo controlled trial. J Urol. 2013;189(6):2186-2193.
Chapple C, Sievert KD, MacDiarmid S, et al. OnabotulinumtoxinA 100 U significantly improves all idiopathic overactive bladder symptoms and quality of life in patients with overactive bladder and urinary incontinence: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Eur Urol. 2013;64(2):249-256.
Herschorn S, Kohan A, Aliotta P, et al. The efficacy and safety of onabotulinumtoxinA or solifenacin compared with placebo in solifenacin naïve patients with refractory overactive bladder: results from a multicenter, randomized, double-blind phase 3b trial. J Urol. 2017;198(1):167-175.
McCammon K, Gousse A, Kohan A, et al. Early and consistent improvements in urinary symptoms and quality of life with onabotulinumtoxinA in patients with overactive bladder and urinary incontinence: results from a randomized, placebo-controlled, phase IV clinical trial. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2021;27(7):450-456.
Kuo HC. Therapeutic outcome and quality of life between urethral and detrusor botulinum toxin treatment for patients with spinal cord lesions and detrusor sphincter dyssynergia. Int J Clin Pract. 2013;67(10):1044-1049.
Chen SF, Jiang YH, Jhang JF, Kuo HC. Satisfaction with detrusor onabotulinumtoxinA injections and conversion to other bladder management in patients with chronic spinal cord injury. Toxins. 2022;14(1):35.
Crescenze IM, Myers JB, Lenherr SM, et al. Predictors of low urinary quality of life in spinal cord injury patients on clean intermittent catheterization. Neurourol Urodyn. 2019;38(5):1332-1338.
Patel DP, Herrick JS, Stoffel JT, et al. Reasons for cessation of clean intermittent catheterization after spinal cord injury: results from the Neurogenic Bladder Research Group spinal cord injury registry. Neurourol Urodyn. 2020;39(1):211-219.
Karsenty G, Elzayat E, Delapparent T, St-Denis B, Lemieux MC, Corcos J. Botulinum toxin type a injections into the trigone to treat idiopathic overactive bladder do not induce vesicoureteral reflux. J Urol. 2007;177(3):1011-1014.
Jo JK, Kim KN, Kim DW, Kim YT, Kim JY, Kim JY. The effect of onabotulinumtoxinA according to site of injection in patients with overactive bladder: a systematic review and meta-analysis. World J Urol. 2018;36(2):305-317.
El-Hefnawy AS, Elbaset MA, Taha DE, et al. Trigonal-sparing versus trigonal-involved Botox injection for treatment of idiopathic overactive bladder: a randomized clinical trial. Low Urin Tract Symptoms. 2021;13(1):22-30.
Colman S, Chapple C, Nitti V, Haag-Molkenteller C, Hastedt C, Massow U. Validation of treatment benefit scale for assessing subjective outcomes in treatment of overactive bladder. Urology. 2008;72(4):803-807.
Patrick DL, Martin ML, Bushnell DM, Yalcin I, Wagner TH, Buesching DP. Quality of life of women with urinary incontinence: further development of the incontinence quality of life instrument (I-QOL). Urology. 1999;53:71-76.
Patrick DL, Khalaf KM, Dmochowski R, Kowalski JW, Globe DR. Psychometric performance of the incontinence quality-of-life questionnaire among patients with overactive bladder and urinary incontinence. Clin Ther. 2013;35(6):836-845.
Apostolidis A, Popat R, Yiangou Y, et al. Decreased sensory receptors P2X3 and TRPV1 in suburothelial nerve fibers following intradetrusor injections of botulinum toxin for human detrusor overactivity. J Urol. 2005;174(3):977-983.
discussion 982-973.
Mehnert U, Boy S, Schmid M, et al. A morphological evaluation of botulinum neurotoxin A injections into the detrusor muscle using magnetic resonance imaging. World J Urol. 2009;27(3):397-403.
Purves JT, Spruill L, Rovner E, et al. A three dimensional nerve map of human bladder trigone. Neurourol Urodyn. 2017;36(4):1015-1019.
Liao CH, Chen SF, Kuo HC. Different number of intravesical onabotulinumtoxinA injections for patients with refractory detrusor overactivity do not affect treatment outcome: a prospective randomized comparative study. Neurourol Urodyn. 2016;35(6):717-723.
Chang ES, Ringel N, Woodburn KL, et al. Postprocedural pain associated with 5 versus 20 intradetrusor injections of onabotulinumtoxinA for treatment of overactive bladder: a multicenter randomized clinical trial. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 2022;77:650-651.
Avallone MA, Sack BS, El-Arabi A, Guralnick ML, O'Connor RC. Less is more-a pilot study evaluating one to three intradetrusor sites for injection of OnabotulinumtoxinA for neurogenic and idiopathic detrusor overactivity. Neurourol Urodyn. 2017;36(4):1104-1107.
DiCarlo-Meacham AM, Dengler KL, Welch EK, et al. Reduced versus standard intradetrusor onabotulinumtoxinA injections for treatment of overactive bladder. Neurourol Urodyn. 2023;42(1):366-374.
Ton J, Downing P, Versi E, et al. Outcomes of a single trigone-only vs. 20 trigone-sparing injections of OnabotulinumtoxinA for refractory overactive bladder (OAB). Int Urol Nephrol. 2021;53(6):1067-1072.
Anger J, Lee U, Ackerman AL, et al. Recurrent uncomplicated urinary tract infections in women: AUA/CUA/SUFU guideline. J Urol. 2019;202(2):282-289.
Kennelly M, Green L, Alvandi N, et al. Clean intermittent catheterization rates after initial and subsequent treatments with onabotulinumtoxinA for non-neurogenic overactive bladder in real-world clinical settings. Curr Med Res Opin. 2018;34(10):1771-1776.
Reynolds WS, Suskind AM, Anger JT, et al. Incomplete bladder emptying and urinary tract infections after botulinum toxin injection for overactive bladder: multi-institutional collaboration from the SUFU research network. Neurourol Urodyn. 2022;41(2):662-671.
Hamid R, Lorenzo-Gomez MF, Schulte-Baukloh H, Boroujerdi A, Patel A, Farrelly E. OnabotulinumtoxinA is a well tolerated and effective treatment for refractory overactive bladder in real-world practice. Int Urogynecol J. 2021;32(1):65-74.