Gender Differences in Procedural Clinical Complications and Outcomes of Intracranial Aneurysms: Analysis of the Stroke Thrombectomy and Aneurysm Registry.


Journal

Neurosurgery
ISSN: 1524-4040
Titre abrégé: Neurosurgery
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 7802914

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
25 Sep 2023
Historique:
received: 22 06 2023
accepted: 27 07 2023
medline: 25 9 2023
pubmed: 25 9 2023
entrez: 25 9 2023
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

Some studies have shown that female patients had a poorer prognosis after endovascular treatment for ruptured intracranial aneurysm than male patients. However, data have been sparse regarding differences in the periprocedural and perioperative complication rate with ruptured and unruptured intracranial aneurysms. This retrospective cohort study used data from the Stroke Thrombectomy and Aneurysm Registry, a database of 9 institutions in the United States, Europe, and Asia. The study presented intracranial aneurysms after microsurgical and/or endovascular treatment from January 1, 2013, to December 31, 2022. The primary outcome was incidence of periprocedural cerebral infarction. Secondary outcomes were periprocedural intracranial hemorrhage, periprocedural mortality, perioperative vasospasm, and functional outcome at 90 days after procedure. Among 3342 patients with aneurysm, 2447 were female and 857 were male, and the mean age of female and male patients was 59.6 and 57.1 years, respectively. Current smoker, family history of aneurysm, and ruptured aneurysm were observed in 23.5% vs 35.7 %, 10.8 % vs 5.7%, and 28.2% vs 40.5% of female and male patients, respectively. In female patients, internal carotid artery aneurysms were more commonly observed (31.1% vs 17.3%); however, anterior cerebral artery aneurysms were less commonly observed (18.5% vs 33.8%) compared with male patients. Periprocedural cerebral infarction rate was lower in female than male patients (2.4% vs 4.4%; P = .002). The adjusted odds ratio of primary outcome of female to male patients was 0.72 (95% CI, 0.46-1.12). Incidence of periprocedural intracranial hemorrhage and periprocedural mortality and perioperative symptomatic vasospasm and functional outcome was similar in both groups. In subgroup analysis, periprocedural cerebral infarction due to microsurgical treatment occurred frequently in male patients while incidence in endovascular treatment was similar in both groups (interaction P = .005). This large multicenter registry of patients undergoing intracranial aneurysm treatment found that female patients were not at increased risk of perioperative complications.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES OBJECTIVE
Some studies have shown that female patients had a poorer prognosis after endovascular treatment for ruptured intracranial aneurysm than male patients. However, data have been sparse regarding differences in the periprocedural and perioperative complication rate with ruptured and unruptured intracranial aneurysms.
METHODS METHODS
This retrospective cohort study used data from the Stroke Thrombectomy and Aneurysm Registry, a database of 9 institutions in the United States, Europe, and Asia. The study presented intracranial aneurysms after microsurgical and/or endovascular treatment from January 1, 2013, to December 31, 2022. The primary outcome was incidence of periprocedural cerebral infarction. Secondary outcomes were periprocedural intracranial hemorrhage, periprocedural mortality, perioperative vasospasm, and functional outcome at 90 days after procedure.
RESULTS RESULTS
Among 3342 patients with aneurysm, 2447 were female and 857 were male, and the mean age of female and male patients was 59.6 and 57.1 years, respectively. Current smoker, family history of aneurysm, and ruptured aneurysm were observed in 23.5% vs 35.7 %, 10.8 % vs 5.7%, and 28.2% vs 40.5% of female and male patients, respectively. In female patients, internal carotid artery aneurysms were more commonly observed (31.1% vs 17.3%); however, anterior cerebral artery aneurysms were less commonly observed (18.5% vs 33.8%) compared with male patients. Periprocedural cerebral infarction rate was lower in female than male patients (2.4% vs 4.4%; P = .002). The adjusted odds ratio of primary outcome of female to male patients was 0.72 (95% CI, 0.46-1.12). Incidence of periprocedural intracranial hemorrhage and periprocedural mortality and perioperative symptomatic vasospasm and functional outcome was similar in both groups. In subgroup analysis, periprocedural cerebral infarction due to microsurgical treatment occurred frequently in male patients while incidence in endovascular treatment was similar in both groups (interaction P = .005).
CONCLUSION CONCLUSIONS
This large multicenter registry of patients undergoing intracranial aneurysm treatment found that female patients were not at increased risk of perioperative complications.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37747370
doi: 10.1227/neu.0000000000002695
pii: 00006123-990000000-00899
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Subventions

Organisme : Penumbra

Informations de copyright

Copyright © Congress of Neurological Surgeons 2023. All rights reserved.

Références

Appelros P, Stegmayr B, Terént A. Sex differences in stroke epidemiology: a systematic review. Stroke. 2009;40(4):1082-1090.
Uchida K, Yoshimura S, Sakai N, Yamagami H, Morimoto T. Sex differences in management and outcomes of acute ischemic stroke with large vessel occlusion. Stroke. 2019;50(7):1915-1918.
Pierot L, Barbe C, Nguyen HA, et al. Intraoperative complications of endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms with coiling or balloon-assisted coiling in a prospective multicenter cohort of 1088 participants: analysis of recanalization after endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysm (ARETA) study. Radiology. 2020;296(2):e130–e133.
Al-Mufti F, Roh D, Lahiri S, et al. Ultra-early angiographic vasospasm associated with delayed cerebral ischemia and infarction following aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. J Neurosurg. 2017;126(5):1545-1551.
Lambert G, Naredi S, Edén E, Rydenhag B, Friberg P. Monoamine metabolism and sympathetic nervous activation following subarachnoid haemorrhage: influence of gender and hydrocephalus. Brain Res Bull. 2002;58(1):77-82.
Algra AM, Lindgren A, Vergouwen MDI, et al. Procedural clinical complications, case-fatality risks, and risk factors in endovascular and neurosurgical treatment of unruptured intracranial aneurysms: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Neurol. 2019;76(3):282-293.
Fuentes AM, Stone McGuire L, Amin-Hanjani S. Sex differences in cerebral aneurysms and subarachnoid hemorrhage. Stroke. 2022;53(2):624-633.
Hunt WE, Hess RM. Surgical risk as related to time of intervention in the repair of intracranial aneurysms. J Neurosurg. 1968;28(1):14-20.
Brinjikji W, Rabinstein AA, Lanzino G, Kallmes DF, Cloft HJ. Effect of age on outcomes of treatment of unruptured cerebral aneurysms: a study of the National Inpatient Sample 2001-2008. Stroke. 2011;42(5):1320-1324.
Koester S, Zeoli T, Yengo-Kahn A, et al. Race as a factor in adverse outcomes following unruptured aneurysm surgery. J Clin Neurosci. 2023;107:34-39.
Spetzler RF, McDougall CG, Zabramski JM, et al. Ten-year analysis of saccular aneurysms in the barrow ruptured aneurysm trial. J Neurosurg. 2020;132(3):771-776.
Molyneux A, Kerr R, Stratton I, et al. International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial (ISAT) of neurosurgical clipping versus endovascular coiling in 2143 patients with ruptured intracranial aneurysms: a randomised trial. Lancet. 2002;360(9342):1267-1274.
Rutledge C, Raper DMS, Jonzzon S, et al. Sensitivity of the unruptured intracranial aneurysm treatment score (UIATS) in the elderly: retrospective analysis of ruptured aneurysms. World Neurosurg. 2021;152:e673-e677.
Hammer A, Ranaie G, Yakubov E, et al. Dynamics of outcome after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. Aging (Albany NY). 2020;12(8):7207-7217.
Raaymakers TW, Rinkel GJ, Limburg M, Algra A. Mortality and morbidity of surgery for unruptured intracranial aneurysms: a meta-analysis. Stroke. 1998;29(8):1531-1538.
Matsukawa H, Kamiyama H, Tsuboi T, et al. Is age a risk factor for poor outcome of surgical treatment of unruptured intracranial aneurysms? World Neurosurg. 2016;94:222-228.
Burks JD, Chen SH, Luther EM, et al. Effect of hispanic status in mechanical thrombectomy outcomes after ischemic stroke: insights from STAR. Stroke. 2021;52(11):e715–e719.
Cai Y, Liu Z, Jia C, et al. Comparison of sex differences in outcomes of patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: a single-center retrospective study. Front Neurol. 2022;13:853513.
Ahn JM, Oh JS, Yoon SM, Shim JH, Oh HJ, Bae HG. Procedure-related complications during endovascular treatment of intracranial saccular aneurysms. J Cerebrovasc Endovasc Neurosurg. 2017;19(3):162-170.
Matsukawa H, Kamiyama H, Kinoshita Y, et al. Morphological parameters as factors of 12-month neurological worsening in surgical treatment of patients with unruptured saccular intracranial aneurysms: importance of size ratio. J Neurosurg. 2019;131(3):852-858.
Heit JJ, Ball RL, Telischak NA, et al. Patient outcomes and cerebral infarction after ruptured anterior communicating artery aneurysm treatment. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2017;38(11):2119-2125.
Yanagisawa T, Zhang H, Suzuki T, et al. Sex and genetic background effects on the outcome of experimental intracranial aneurysms. Stroke. 2020;51(10):3083-3094.
Lin B, Chen W, Ruan L, et al. Sex differences in aneurysm morphologies and clinical outcomes in ruptured anterior communicating artery aneurysms: a retrospective study. BMJ Open. 2016;6(4):e009920.

Auteurs

Kazutaka Uchida (K)

Department of Neurosurgery, Hyogo Medical University, Nishinomiya, Japan.
Department of Neurosurgery, Division of Neuroendovascular Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA.
Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Hyogo Medical University, Nishinomiya, Japan.

Hidetoshi Matsukawa (H)

Department of Neurosurgery, Hyogo Medical University, Nishinomiya, Japan.
Department of Neurosurgery, Division of Neuroendovascular Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA.

Mohammad-Mahdi Sowlat (MM)

Department of Neurosurgery, Division of Neuroendovascular Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA.

Sameh Samir Elawady (SS)

Department of Neurosurgery, Division of Neuroendovascular Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA.

Ali Alawieh (A)

Department of Neurosurgery, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.

Pascal Jabbour (P)

Department of Neurosurgery, Thomas Jefferson University Hospitals, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.

Justin Mascitelli (J)

Department of Neurosurgery, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas, USA.

Michael R Levitt (MR)

Department of Neurosurgery, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.

Hugo Cuellar (H)

Department of Neurosurgery and Neurointerventional Radiology, Louisiana State University, Shreveport, Louisiana, USA.

Edgar A Samaniego (EA)

Department of Neurology, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, Iowa, USA.

Peter Kan (P)

Department of Neurosurgery, University of Texas Medical Branch-Galveston, Galveston, Texas, USA.

Mark Moss (M)

Department of Neuroradiology, Washington Regional J.B. Hunt Transport Services Neuroscience Institute, Fayetteville, Arkansas, USA.

Alejandro M Spiotta (AM)

Department of Neurosurgery, Division of Neuroendovascular Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA.

Shinichi Yoshimura (S)

Department of Neurosurgery, Hyogo Medical University, Nishinomiya, Japan.

Classifications MeSH