Artificial Intelligence and the Simulationists.
Journal
Simulation in healthcare : journal of the Society for Simulation in Healthcare
ISSN: 1559-713X
Titre abrégé: Simul Healthc
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101264408
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 Dec 2023
01 Dec 2023
Historique:
medline:
30
11
2023
pubmed:
25
9
2023
entrez:
25
9
2023
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The recent introduction of ChatGPT, an advanced, easy-to-use, and freely available artificial intelligence (AI) program, created new possibilities across many industries and professions including healthcare simulation. ChatGPT has the potential to streamline healthcare simulation-based education while also providing insights for the scenario development process that conventional case development may miss. However, there are issues related to accuracy, relevance, and structure of the products produced by the ChatGPT AI program. This article examines 2 AI-generated simulation case examples highlighting strengths and weaknesses while providing guidance on the use of ChatGPT as a simulation resource.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37747487
doi: 10.1097/SIH.0000000000000747
pii: 01266021-990000000-00086
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
395-399Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2023 Society for Simulation in Healthcare.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Références
Cascella M, Montomoli J, Bellini V, Bignami E. Evaluating the feasibility of ChatGPT in healthcare: an analysis of multiple clinical and research scenarios. J Med Syst 2023;47(1):33.
Antaki F, Touma S, Milad D, El-Khoury J, Duval R. Evaluating the performance of chatgpt in ophthalmology: an analysis of its successes and shortcomings. medRxiv 2023;3, 4:100324.
Benoit JR. ChatGPT for clinical vignette generation, revision, and evaluation. medRxiv 2023: 2023.02. 04.23285478.
Biswas S. ChatGPT and the future of medical writing. Radiology 2023;307:223312.
Macdonald C, Adeloye D, Sheikh A, Rudan I. Can ChatGPT draft a research article? An example of population-level vaccine effectiveness analysis. J Glob Health 2023;13.
Salvagno M, Taccone FS, Gerli AG. Can artificial intelligence help for scientific writing? Crit Care 2023;27(1):1–5.
Kung TH, Cheatham M, Medenilla A, et al. Performance of ChatGPT on USMLE: potential for AI-assisted medical education using large language models. PLOS Digital Health 2023;2(2):e0000198.
Harder N. Using ChatGPT in simulation design: what can (or should) it do for you? Clin Simul Nurs 2023. doi:10.1016/j.ecns.2023.02.011.
doi: 10.1016/j.ecns.2023.02.011
Lee H. The rise of ChatGPT: Exploring its potential in medical education. Anat Sci Educ 2023. doi:10.1002/ase.2270.
doi: 10.1002/ase.2270
Baruffati A, Chat GPT. Statistics 2023: trends and the future perspectives . Web Blog. Updated 2023, March 14. Available at: https://blog.gitnux.com/chat-gpt-statistics/ . Accessed March 24, 2023.
Hernandez J, Frallicciardi A, Nadir NA, Gothard MD, Ahmed RA. Development of a Simulation Scenario Evaluation Tool (SSET): modified Delphi study. BMJ Simul Technol Enhanc Learn 2020;6(6):344–350.
Thomas PA, Kern DE, Hughes MT, Tackett SA, Chen BY. Curriculum Development for Medical Education: A Six-Step Approach . Baltimore, MD: JHU Press; 2022.
Dick W, Carey L, Carey J. A model for the systematic design of instruction. Instruct Des 2013;1:361–370.
Sawyer T, Eppich W, Brett-Fleegler M, Grant V, Cheng A. More than one way to debrief: a critical review of healthcare simulation debriefing methods. Simul Healthc 2016;11(3):209–217.
Stokel-Walker C, Van Noorden R. What ChatGPT and generative AI mean for science. Nature 2023;614(7947):214–216.
Fijacko N, Gosak L, Stiglic G, Picard CT, John Douma M. Can ChatGPT pass the life support exams without entering the American Heart Association course? Resuscitation 2023;185:109732. doi:10.1016/j.resuscitation.2023.109732.
doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2023.109732
Gilson A, Safranek CW, Huang T, et al. How does CHATGPT perform on the United States Medical Licensing Examination? The implications of large language models for medical education and knowledge assessment. JMIR Med Educ 2023;9(1):e45312.
Alkaissi H, McFarlane SI. Artificial hallucinations in ChatGPT: implications in scientific writing. Cureus 2023;15(2):e35179.
Ji Z, Lee N, Frieske R, et al. Survey of hallucination in natural language generation. ACM Comput Surveys 2023;55(12):1–38.
Shoja MM, Van de Ridder JMM, Rajput V. The emerging role of generative artificial intelligence in medical education, research, and practice. Cureus 2023;15(6):e40883.
Arif TB, Munaf U, Ul-Haque I. The future of medical education and research: is ChatGPT a blessing or blight in disguise? Med Educ Online 2023;28(1):2181052.
Armstrong AB. Who's afraid of ChatGPT? An examination of ChatGPT's implications for legal writing. SSRN 2023. doi:10.2139/ssrn.4336929.
doi: 10.2139/ssrn.4336929
Authorship and AI Tools. Committee on Publication Ethics. 2023. Accessed June 12, 2023. https://publicationethics.org/cope-position-statements/ai-author
O'Connor S. Corrigendum to “Open artificial intelligence platforms in nursing education: Tools for academic progress or abuse?” [ Nurse Educ Pract . 2023;66:103537]. Nurse Educ Pract 2023;67:103572.