Syntactic theory of mathematical expressions.
Mathematics
Numerical cognition
Syntax
Theoretical linguistics
Tree structures
Journal
Cognitive psychology
ISSN: 1095-5623
Titre abrégé: Cogn Psychol
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 0241111
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
11 2023
11 2023
Historique:
received:
10
02
2023
revised:
28
06
2023
accepted:
16
09
2023
medline:
23
10
2023
pubmed:
26
9
2023
entrez:
25
9
2023
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Mathematical expressions consist of recursive combinations of numbers, variables, and operators. According to theoretical linguists, the syntactic mechanisms of natural language also provide a basis for mathematics. To date, however, no theoretically rigorous investigation has been conducted to support such arguments. Therefore, this study uses a methodology based on theoretical linguistics to analyze the syntactic properties of mathematical expressions. Through a review of recent behavioral and neuroimaging studies on mathematical syntax, we report several inconsistencies with theoretical linguistics, such as the use of ternary structures. To address these, we propose that a syntactic category called Applicative plays a central role in analyzing mathematical expressions with seemingly ternary structures by combining binary structures. Besides basic arithmetic expressions, we also examine algebraic equations and complex expressions such as integral and differential calculi. This study is the first attempt at building a comprehensive framework for analyzing the syntactic structures of mathematical expressions.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37748253
pii: S0010-0285(23)00064-6
doi: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2023.101606
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Review
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
101606Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.