Tension as a key factor in skin responses to pollution.
Journal
Scientific reports
ISSN: 2045-2322
Titre abrégé: Sci Rep
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101563288
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
25 09 2023
25 09 2023
Historique:
received:
07
02
2023
accepted:
12
09
2023
medline:
27
9
2023
pubmed:
26
9
2023
entrez:
25
9
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Being the more apparent organ exposed to the outdoor stressors, the effect of pollution on the skin has been widely studied in the last few decades. Although UV light is known as the most aggressive stressor to which our cutaneous tissue is daily exposed, other components of the tropospheric pollution have also shown to affect skin health and functionality. Among them, ozone has been proven to be one of the most toxic due to its high reactivity with the epidermal lipids. Studying the cutaneous effect of pollution in a laboratory setting presents challenges, therefore it becomes critical to employ appropriate and tailored models that aim to answer specific questions. Several skin models are available nowadays: in vitro models (2D cell lines and 3D cutaneous tissues), ex vivo skin explants and in vivo approaches (animals and humans). Although in the last 20 years researchers developed skin models that closely resemble human skin (3D cutaneous tissues), ex vivo skin explants still remain one of the best models to study cutaneous responses. Unfortunately, one important cutaneous property that is not present in the traditional ex vivo human skin explants is the physiological tension, which has been shown to be a cardinal player in skin structure, homeostasis, functional properties and responses to external stimuli. For this reason, in this study, to confirm and further comprehend the harmful mechanism of ozone exposure on the integumentary system, we have performed experiments using the state of art in cutaneous models: the innovative TenSkin™ model in which ex vivo human skin explants are cultured under physiologically relevant tension during the whole experimental procedure. Specifically, we were interested in corroborating previous findings showing that ozone exposure modulates the expression of cutaneous antimicrobial peptides (AMPs). The present work demonstrates that cutaneous exposure to ozone induces AMPs gene and protein levels (CAMP/LL-37, hBD2, hBD3) and that the presence of tension can further modulate their expression. In addition, different responses between tension and non-tension cultured skin were also observed during the evaluation of OxInflammatory markers [cyclooxygenase-2 (COX2), aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AhR), matrix-metallo-proteinase 9 (MMP9) and 4-hydroxy-nonenal (4HNE)]. This current study supports our previous findings confirming the ability of pollution to induce the cutaneous expression of AMPs via redox signaling and corroborates the principle that skin explants are a good and reliable model to study skin responses even though it underlines the need to holistically consider the role of skin tension before extrapolating the data to real life.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37749125
doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-42629-6
pii: 10.1038/s41598-023-42629-6
pmc: PMC10519937
doi:
Substances chimiques
Antimicrobial Peptides
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
16013Informations de copyright
© 2023. Springer Nature Limited.
Références
J Photochem Photobiol B. 2001 Oct;63(1-3):41-51
pubmed: 11684450
Annu Rev Immunol. 1995;13:61-92
pubmed: 7612236
Exp Dermatol. 2017 Nov;26(11):989-998
pubmed: 28191680
Front Med (Lausanne). 2018 May 30;5:166
pubmed: 29900173
Infect Immun. 2015 Jun;83(6):2507-17
pubmed: 25847963
Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2012 Oct;1271:75-81
pubmed: 23050967
J Drugs Dermatol. 2018 Apr 1;17(4):426-441
pubmed: 29601620
J Innate Immun. 2019;11(2):125-135
pubmed: 30176668
Antioxidants (Basel). 2021 Nov 30;10(12):
pubmed: 34943031
Environ Pollut. 2015 Apr;199:42-8
pubmed: 25618365
Hautarzt. 2019 Mar;70(3):163-168
pubmed: 30747245
Redox Biol. 2020 Jul;34:101481
pubmed: 32336667
Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol. 2000 Jun;22(6):714-21
pubmed: 10837369
Trends Biotechnol. 1998 Feb;16(2):82-8
pubmed: 9487736
Environ Health Perspect. 2017 Jul 05;125(7):077003
pubmed: 28696208
Int J Mol Sci. 2023 Jun 22;24(13):
pubmed: 37445680
Front Physiol. 2018 Jul 09;9:858
pubmed: 30038581
Cardiovasc Res. 2020 Sep 1;116(11):1910-1917
pubmed: 32123898
PLoS One. 2009 Jul 22;4(7):e6340
pubmed: 19623255
Biopolymers. 1998;47(6):451-63
pubmed: 10333737
Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2003 Jun 6;305(3):741-6
pubmed: 12763055
J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol. 2021 Feb;31(1):137-148
pubmed: 33127990
J Biol Chem. 1997 Jun 13;272(24):15258-63
pubmed: 9182550
Toxicol Sci. 2016 Jan;149(1):227-36
pubmed: 26507108
Sci Rep. 2020 Oct 15;10(1):17356
pubmed: 33060695
Gene. 1998 Nov 19;222(2):237-44
pubmed: 9831658
J Invest Dermatol. 2001 Jul;117(1):91-7
pubmed: 11442754
Int J Mol Sci. 2020 Mar 22;21(6):
pubmed: 32235789
J Cell Sci. 2012 Jul 1;125(Pt 13):3061-73
pubmed: 22797927
MethodsX. 2018 May 30;5:599-608
pubmed: 29984193
Am J Physiol. 1998 Jan;274(1):L8-16
pubmed: 9458795
Environ Int. 2019 Mar;124:139-144
pubmed: 30641257
Curr Biol. 2016 Jan 11;26(1):R14-9
pubmed: 26766224
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 May 06;17(9):
pubmed: 32384765
Free Radic Biol Med. 1990;9(3):245-65
pubmed: 2272533
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2002 Dec;110(6):823-31
pubmed: 12464945
Part Fibre Toxicol. 2020 Jul 25;17(1):35
pubmed: 32711561
Commun Biol. 2020 Oct 30;3(1):637
pubmed: 33127987
Redox Biol. 2021 May;41:101952
pubmed: 33839421
Int Arch Allergy Immunol. 2008;147(1):17-24
pubmed: 18446049
Ultrastruct Pathol. 2015 Feb;39(1):49-61
pubmed: 25215902
J Toxicol Environ Health A. 2015;78(8):524-33
pubmed: 25849769
Allergol Int. 2018 Jan;67(1):3-11
pubmed: 29153780
Br J Dermatol. 2011 Jul;165(1):224-5
pubmed: 21457212
Biofactors. 2019 Jul;45(4):536-547
pubmed: 31087730
J Innate Immun. 2012;4(4):337-48
pubmed: 22441423
PLoS One. 2014 Jan 23;9(1):e86777
pubmed: 24466237
J Invest Dermatol. 2010 May;130(5):1355-64
pubmed: 20107483
Oxid Med Cell Longev. 2020 Aug 13;2020:9571490
pubmed: 32855770
Front Immunol. 2018 Sep 27;9:2160
pubmed: 30319623
J Dermatol Sci. 2001 Nov;27(3):183-91
pubmed: 11641058
Environ Pollut. 2006 Apr;140(3):516-24
pubmed: 16171911
Toxicol In Vitro. 2020 Feb;62:104664
pubmed: 31669394
Cancer Cell. 2005 Sep;8(3):241-54
pubmed: 16169468
FASEB J. 2003 Nov;17(14):2115-7
pubmed: 12958148
J Invest Dermatol. 2005 Jun;124(6):1318-25
pubmed: 15955110
N Engl J Med. 2002 Oct 10;347(15):1151-60
pubmed: 12374875
Free Radic Biol Med. 2020 May 20;152:561-570
pubmed: 31778733
Br J Dermatol. 2005 Dec;153(6):1096-100
pubmed: 16307642
Respir Res. 2018 Jan 08;19(1):5
pubmed: 29310642
Nat Biotechnol. 1996 May;14(5):587-90
pubmed: 9630947
J Korean Med Sci. 2005 Aug;20(4):649-54
pubmed: 16100459
Allergy Asthma Immunol Res. 2018 May;10(3):207-215
pubmed: 29676067
Cardiovasc Res. 2020 Jul 1;116(8):e102
pubmed: 32582929
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2002 Dec 15;166(12 Pt 2):S44-50
pubmed: 12471088
FEBS J. 2021 Dec;288(24):7162-7182
pubmed: 33405316
Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol. 2017 May 19;10:199-204
pubmed: 28579815