Sexual segregation results in pronounced sex-specific density gradients in the mountain ungulate, Rupicapra rupicapra.
Journal
Communications biology
ISSN: 2399-3642
Titre abrégé: Commun Biol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101719179
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
25 09 2023
25 09 2023
Historique:
received:
12
08
2022
accepted:
01
09
2023
medline:
4
10
2023
pubmed:
26
9
2023
entrez:
25
9
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Sex-specific differences in habitat selection and space use are common in ungulates. Yet, it is largely unknown how this behavioral dimorphism, ultimately leading to sexual segregation, translates to population-level patterns and density gradients across landscapes. Alpine chamois (Rupicapra rupicapra r.) predominantly occupy habitat above tree line, yet especially males may also take advantage of forested habitats. To estimate male and female chamois density and determinants thereof, we applied Bayesian spatial capture-recapture (SCR) models in two contrasting study areas in the Alps, Germany, during autumn. We fitted SCR models to non-invasive individual encounter data derived from genotyped feces. Sex-specific densities were modeled as a function of terrain ruggedness, forest canopy cover, proportion of barren ground, and site severity. We detected pronounced differences in male and female density patterns, driven primarily by terrain ruggedness, rather than by sex-specific effects of canopy cover. The positive effect of ruggedness on density was weaker for males which translated into a higher proportion of males occupying less variable terrain, frequently located in forests, compared to females. By estimating sex-specific variation in both detection probabilities and density, we were able to quantify and map how individual behavioral differences scale up and shape spatial patterns in population density.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37749272
doi: 10.1038/s42003-023-05313-z
pii: 10.1038/s42003-023-05313-z
pmc: PMC10520025
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
979Informations de copyright
© 2023. Springer Nature Limited.
Références
Ecol Evol. 2021 Dec 21;12(1):e8468
pubmed: 35127014
Ecol Appl. 2022 Jul;32(5):e2618
pubmed: 35368131
Trends Ecol Evol. 2011 Apr;26(4):183-92
pubmed: 21367482
Curr Zool. 2019 Apr;65(2):129-137
pubmed: 30936901
Ecology. 2011 Dec;92(12):2202-7
pubmed: 22352159
PLoS One. 2012;7(4):e34575
pubmed: 22539949
Glob Chang Biol. 2014 Dec;20(12):3872-82
pubmed: 24957266
Am Nat. 2003 Jan;161(1):1-28
pubmed: 12650459
Trends Ecol Evol. 2004 Jul;19(7):372-8
pubmed: 16701288
PLoS One. 2014 Feb 05;9(2):e88025
pubmed: 24505361
Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1989 May 22;236(1285):339-72
pubmed: 2567517
Ecol Appl. 2015 Apr;25(3):695-705
pubmed: 26214915
Glob Chang Biol. 2021 Aug;27(16):3741-3752
pubmed: 33993622
Ecology. 2023 Jan;104(1):e3887
pubmed: 36217822
PLoS One. 2016 Jan 29;11(1):e0146458
pubmed: 26824867
PLoS One. 2011;6(11):e25677
pubmed: 22102854
Ecol Evol. 2018 Dec 18;9(1):352-363
pubmed: 30680119
Mol Biol Rep. 2010 Jul;37(6):2915-8
pubmed: 19809889
Commun Biol. 2023 Sep 25;6(1):979
pubmed: 37749272
Mol Ecol. 2001 Jan;10(1):249-56
pubmed: 11251803
Ecology. 2019 Feb;100(2):e02580
pubmed: 30601582
Ecol Evol. 2021 May 01;11(11):7057-7068
pubmed: 34141275
Conserv Biol. 2010 Apr;24(2):621-6
pubmed: 20105205
Behav Processes. 2021 Mar;184:104300
pubmed: 33422643
Ecology. 2022 Oct;103(10):e3676
pubmed: 35253209
Ecol Evol. 2022 Feb 15;12(2):e8600
pubmed: 35222967
J Theor Biol. 1969 Feb;22(2):227-37
pubmed: 5783911
Trends Ecol Evol. 2005 Dec;20(12):685-92
pubmed: 16701458
Trends Ecol Evol. 2006 Sep;21(9):524-30
pubmed: 16815588