The Boot Camp Model in Urology: Preparing PGY1 Urology Interns for Practice.

Boot camp Intern Simulation Surgery Urology

Journal

Current urology reports
ISSN: 1534-6285
Titre abrégé: Curr Urol Rep
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 100900943

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
26 Sep 2023
Historique:
accepted: 09 09 2023
medline: 26 9 2023
pubmed: 26 9 2023
entrez: 25 9 2023
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

The purpose of this review is to highlight literature regarding resident boot camps published across surgical specialties with a focus on urology. Herein, we discuss different boot camp iterations, their results, and the integration of simulation into their curriculum. We review program elements such as curriculum, course length, and efficacy as well as areas for continued investigation. The field of urology has grown in both the breadth of knowledge and the complexity of procedures. With urology now being an integrated surgical subspecialty, interns often start on the urology service despite limited experience navigating this unique specialty. The boot camp model is one method by which interns and junior residents participate in consolidated training programs to best prepare them for a patient-facing role and the day-to-day demands of residency. Urology programs, both in the USA and abroad, have begun integrating boot camps into their training programs with positive results. Urology boot camps can be a valuable part of training programs for interns to quickly establish medical knowledge, skills, and efficiency. Boot camps should be easily accessible, have sufficient support from institutions, and provide effective training through various methods such as didactics and simulation.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37749358
doi: 10.1007/s11934-023-01186-1
pii: 10.1007/s11934-023-01186-1
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Review

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Informations de copyright

© 2023. This is a U.S. Government work and not under copyright protection in the US; foreign copyright protection may apply.

Auteurs

Melinda Z Fu (MZ)

Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Clinical Academic Building, 125 Paterson Street, Suite 4100, New Brunswick, NJ, 08901, USA.

Raeesa Islam (R)

Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Clinical Academic Building, 125 Paterson Street, Suite 4100, New Brunswick, NJ, 08901, USA.

Joseph DeMarzo (J)

Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Piscataway, NJ, USA.

Benjamin Lichtbroun (B)

Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Clinical Academic Building, 125 Paterson Street, Suite 4100, New Brunswick, NJ, 08901, USA.

Alexandra L Tabakin (AL)

Division of Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery, Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine and Hofstra/Northwell, Great Neck, NY, USA.

Ji Hae Park (JH)

Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Clinical Academic Building, 125 Paterson Street, Suite 4100, New Brunswick, NJ, 08901, USA.

Sammy E Elsamra (SE)

Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Clinical Academic Building, 125 Paterson Street, Suite 4100, New Brunswick, NJ, 08901, USA. elsamrsa@rwjms.rutgers.edu.

Classifications MeSH