GPs in UK: From Health Gatekeepers in Primary Care to Health Agents in Primary Health Care.
general practitioner
health agent
health gatekeeper
Journal
Risk management and healthcare policy
ISSN: 1179-1594
Titre abrégé: Risk Manag Healthc Policy
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101566264
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2023
2023
Historique:
received:
27
04
2023
accepted:
01
09
2023
medline:
26
9
2023
pubmed:
26
9
2023
entrez:
26
9
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
After 75 years of reformed practice, general practitioners (GPs) in the UK have transformed from health gatekeepers who simply provide medical decision-making such as diagnostic and treatment services and referral services, to health agents who proactively provide more relevant health services such as immunizations, health monitoring and health management, etc. In order to discuss this transformation of the role of the general practitioner and the conditions for the evolution of the role, this study chose the documentary analysis method to provide a comprehensive overview of the legal and normative documents related to the general practitioner. Furthermore, this study uses a comparative analysis method to conclude the definition and role characteristics of GPs as health agents. This study summarises the general pattern of evolution of GPs into health agents. The transformation into a health agent relies on the interpersonal trust and rigorous institutional of society on the general practitioner system. The expansion of GPs' clientele and range of services, together with the motivation to proactively provide services, have combined to push for a "qualitative change" in the GP's role as health agent. The transformation of the role of the general practitioner to a health agent is a historical necessity. It responds to the evolution of society's understanding of health and the need for higher levels of health. Therefore, recognizing the role of GPs as health agents is important for optimizing the use of health care resources and improving the health of society by taking advantage of this role.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37750073
doi: 10.2147/RMHP.S416934
pii: 416934
pmc: PMC10518152
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
1929-1939Informations de copyright
© 2023 Bi and Liu.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Références
BMJ Open. 2020 Jul 1;10(7):e037043
pubmed: 32611744
Int J Clin Pract. 2009 Oct;63(10):1416-8
pubmed: 19674162
Br J Gen Pract. 2002 Feb;52(475):141-4
pubmed: 11885824
Soc Sci Med. 1997 Aug;45(3):341-9
pubmed: 9232729
J Health Econ. 1998 Dec;17(6):645-73
pubmed: 10339247
Health Policy. 1997 Jul;41(1):37-60
pubmed: 10169061
Br J Gen Pract. 2006 Jun;56(527):407-14
pubmed: 16762121
EPMA J. 2010 Dec;1(4):529-34
pubmed: 23199107
Qual Prim Care. 2011;19(5):317-23
pubmed: 22186174
Scientifica (Cairo). 2012;2012:432892
pubmed: 24278694
Lancet. 2018 Jul 7;392(10141):15-17
pubmed: 30047384
Soc Sci Med. 2001 Nov;53(9):1149-62
pubmed: 11556606
Front Med (Lausanne). 2018 Mar 12;5:61
pubmed: 29662881
Health Expect. 2019 Jun;22(3):435-443
pubmed: 30632242
Br J Gen Pract. 2006 Feb;56(523):83-4
pubmed: 16464318
BMJ. 2016 Sep 23;354:i4803
pubmed: 27662893
Health Aff (Millwood). 1991 Fall;10(3):60-70
pubmed: 1748391
Soc Sci Med. 1995 Jun;40(12):1683-90
pubmed: 7660181
Int J Health Serv. 2012;42(3):539-47
pubmed: 22993967
BMJ. 2023 Feb 3;380:284
pubmed: 36737064
Br J Gen Pract. 2008 Feb;58(547):128-30; discussion 130
pubmed: 18307864
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2010;8(6):373-5
pubmed: 21043538
Healthc Policy. 2007 May;2(4):34-48
pubmed: 19305731
BMJ. 2021 Sep 13;374:n2234
pubmed: 34518166
Front Public Health. 2020 Nov 26;8:574111
pubmed: 33324597
Prim Health Care Res Dev. 2017 Nov;18(6):529-540
pubmed: 28797316
Intern Med J. 2005 Jul;35(7):430-4
pubmed: 15958116