Does sagittal alignment of the femoral component have an impact on radiological loosening and functional results in revision knee arthroplasty?
Journal
Joint diseases and related surgery
ISSN: 2687-4792
Titre abrégé: Jt Dis Relat Surg
Pays: Turkey
ID NLM: 101764223
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
16 Sep 2023
16 Sep 2023
Historique:
medline:
27
9
2023
pubmed:
26
9
2023
entrez:
26
9
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
In this study, we aimed to investigate the effect of sagittal alignment of the femoral component on both radiological loosening and functional results in revision total knee arthroplasty (rTKA), as well as the anterior condylar offset (ACO) and posterior condylar offset (PCO). Between December 2005 and November 2020, a total of 47 patients (12 males, 35 females; mean age: of 67.1±8.4 years; range, 52 to 90 years) who underwent rTKA due to aseptic prosthesis failure were retrospectively analyzed. Demographic data including age, sex, body mass index (BMI), and clinical outcomes of the patients were recorded. Early postoperative sagittal alignment of the femoral component, ACO, and PCO were measured. Radiological loosening of patients was evaluated using the modified Knee Society Score, while the functional outcomes were assessed using the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS). The mean follow-up was 55.4±28.0 (range, 24 to 142) months. While there was a moderate and inverse correlation between the sagittal alignment of the femoral component and ACO (p=0.002), there was no significant correlation between the sagittal alignment of the femoral component and PCO (p=0.980). There was a weak and inverse correlation between BMI and KOOS (p=0.024). There was no significant relationship between the sagittal alignment of the femoral component, ACO, PCO, age, and sex with radiological loosening (p=0.241) or KOOS (p=0.894). In rTKA, sagittal alignment of the femoral component does not affect radiological loosening and functional results. The sagittal alignment of the femoral component exhibits a moderate and inverse correlation with ACO, while it has no significant correlation with PCO.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37750270
doi: 10.52312/jdrs.2023.1002
pii: jdrs.2023.1002
pmc: PMC10546837
doi:
pii:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
651-660Références
Jt Dis Relat Surg. 2022;33(2):294-302
pubmed: 35852187
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2011 Sep;93(9):1217-22
pubmed: 21911533
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2012 Oct;20(10):2032-8
pubmed: 22183738
Indian J Orthop. 2013 Jan;47(1):77-82
pubmed: 23533002
Knee. 2020 Mar;27(2):477-484
pubmed: 31892431
Bone Joint J. 2020 Jun;102-B(6_Supple_A):36-42
pubmed: 32475263
J Orthop Surg Res. 2019 Aug 28;14(1):280
pubmed: 31462273
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2020 Jan 8;21(1):15
pubmed: 31914984
J Arthroplasty. 2017 Jan;32(1):280-285
pubmed: 27480826
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2003 Nov 03;1:64
pubmed: 14613558
J Arthroplasty. 2011 Apr;26(3):366-374.e1
pubmed: 20413245
Chin J Traumatol. 2015;18(5):259-66
pubmed: 26777708
Jt Dis Relat Surg. 2023;34(1):224-225
pubmed: 36700286
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2017 Jan;137(1):105-110
pubmed: 27900510
Knee. 2016 Jun;23(3):535-9
pubmed: 26826945
Bone Joint J. 2021 Sep;103-B(9):1449-1456
pubmed: 34465158
Knee. 2018 Jun;25(3):480-484
pubmed: 29567061
Jt Dis Relat Surg. 2021;32(1):10-16
pubmed: 33463412
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2002;84-A Suppl 2:37-42
pubmed: 12479337
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2022 Sep;30(9):3184-3190
pubmed: 34125255
J Arthroplasty. 2015 Dec;30(12):2311-4
pubmed: 26122112
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1989 Nov;(248):13-4
pubmed: 2805470
Bone Joint Res. 2017 Mar;6(3):172-178
pubmed: 28360083
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2014 Apr 2;96(7):536-42
pubmed: 24695919
Knee. 2014 Jan;21(1):264-7
pubmed: 23159149
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2014 Apr 2;96(7):529-35
pubmed: 24695918
Jt Dis Relat Surg. 2021;32(1):28-34
pubmed: 33463415
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2003 Nov;(416):217-24
pubmed: 14646764
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2002 Jan;84(1):50-3
pubmed: 11837832