Biodegradation of isoproturon by Escherichia coli expressing a Pseudomonas putida catechol 1,2-dioxygenase gene.
Biodegradation
Catechol 1,2-dioxygenase
Isoproturon
Pseudomonas putida
catA gene
qPCR
Journal
AMB Express
ISSN: 2191-0855
Titre abrégé: AMB Express
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 101561785
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
26 Sep 2023
26 Sep 2023
Historique:
received:
24
07
2023
accepted:
15
09
2023
medline:
26
9
2023
pubmed:
26
9
2023
entrez:
26
9
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The phenylurea herbicides are persistent in soil and water, necessitating the creation of methods for removing them from the environment. This study aimed to examine the soil microbial diversity, searching for local bacterial isolates able to efficiently degrade the phenylurea herbicide isoproturon, 3-(4-isopropylphenyl)-1, 1-dimethylurea (IPU). The best isolates able to effectively degrade IPU were selected, characterized, and identified as Pseudomonas putida and Acinetobacter johnsonii. The catechol 1, 2-dioxygenase enzyme's catA gene was amplified, cloned, and expressed in E. coli M15. The Expressed E. coli showed high degradation efficiency (44.80%) as analyzed by HPLC after 15 days of inoculation in comparison to P. putida (21.60%). The expression of the catA gene in P. putida and expressed E. coli was measured using quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR). The results displayed a significant increase in the mRNA levels of the catA gene by increasing the incubation time with IPU. Hydrophilic interaction chromatography (HILIC) mass spectrometry analysis revealed that three intermediate metabolites, 1-(4-isopropylphenyl)-3-methylurea (MDIPU), 4-Isopropylaniline (4-IA) and 1-(4-isopropylphenyl) urea (DDIPU) were generated by both P. putida and expressed E. coli. In addition, IPU-induced catA activity was detected in both P. putida and expressed E. coli. The supernatant of both P. putida and expressed E. coli had a significant influence on weed growth. The study clearly exhibited that P. putida and expressed E. coli were capable of metabolizing IPU influentially and thus could be utilized for bioremediation and biodegradation technology development.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37751014
doi: 10.1186/s13568-023-01609-9
pii: 10.1186/s13568-023-01609-9
pmc: PMC10522561
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
101Informations de copyright
© 2023. Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.
Références
Annu Rev Microbiol. 1996;50:553-90
pubmed: 8905091
Int J Mol Sci. 2018 Dec 24;20(1):
pubmed: 30586858
Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2021 Nov 01;9:703399
pubmed: 34790650
Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek. 2013 Jun;103(6):1297-307
pubmed: 23536173
FEMS Microbiol Lett. 1992 Oct 15;76(3):261-6
pubmed: 1427016
Saudi J Biol Sci. 2020 Sep;27(9):2207-2214
pubmed: 32884402
Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2008 Jan 18;365(3):453-8
pubmed: 17996731
Sci Total Environ. 2022 Mar 20;813:152522
pubmed: 34953839
Environ Monit Assess. 2020 Mar 4;192(4):212
pubmed: 32133572
Molecules. 2018 Sep 11;23(9):
pubmed: 30208572
3 Biotech. 2016 Dec;6(2):190
pubmed: 28330262
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jan 26;19(3):
pubmed: 35162387
Biotechnol Bioeng. 1999 Nov 20;65(4):407-15
pubmed: 10506416
Avian Pathol. 2016 Oct;45(5):538-44
pubmed: 27171757
Can J Microbiol. 2022 Sep 1;68(9):605-613
pubmed: 35896041
Nature. 1970 Aug 15;227(5259):680-5
pubmed: 5432063
J Bacteriol. 1966 Mar;91(3):1140-54
pubmed: 5929747
J Environ Sci Health B. 2021;56(12):1051-1056
pubmed: 34842510
Biodegradation. 2001;12(1):69-77
pubmed: 11693297
PLoS One. 2012;7(11):e48558
pubmed: 23139793
Folia Microbiol (Praha). 2020 Aug;65(4):687-696
pubmed: 31989423
Arch Environ Contam Toxicol. 2009 Apr;56(3):442-9
pubmed: 18709397
Eur J Biochem. 1967 May;1(3):289-300
pubmed: 6060184
FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2003 Jul 1;45(1):1-11
pubmed: 19719601
AMB Express. 2023 Jan 30;13(1):14
pubmed: 36715862
J Bacteriol. 1995 Jan;177(2):401-12
pubmed: 7814330
Microorganisms. 2023 May 30;11(6):
pubmed: 37374947
BMC Bioinformatics. 2006 Feb 22;7:85
pubmed: 16504059
Biodegradation. 2011 Jun;22(3):637-50
pubmed: 21110068
Residue Rev. 1980;76:1-30
pubmed: 7006021
Chemosphere. 2009 Nov;77(8):1052-9
pubmed: 19836052
J Agric Food Chem. 2022 May 18;70(19):5794-5804
pubmed: 35510781
J Hazard Mater. 2006 Feb 28;129(1-3):216-22
pubmed: 16203081
Trends Biochem Sci. 2001 Nov;26(11):648-53
pubmed: 11701322
J Hazard Mater. 2011 Jan 30;185(2-3):938-44
pubmed: 21035259
PLoS One. 2013;8(2):e56038
pubmed: 23418504
Arch Biochem Biophys. 1995 Aug 20;321(2):353-62
pubmed: 7646060
Methods. 2001 Dec;25(4):402-8
pubmed: 11846609
Chemosphere. 2012 Sep;89(3):334-9
pubmed: 22627152
J Pharm Anal. 2021 Aug;11(4):405-421
pubmed: 34513117
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022 Nov;29(53):80005-80020
pubmed: 35220535
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2008 Apr;74(8):2461-70
pubmed: 18296538
J Bacteriol. 1992 Dec;174(23):7798-806
pubmed: 1447146
Genes (Basel). 2020 Apr 17;11(4):
pubmed: 32316688
Plant Biotechnol J. 2005 Sep;3(5):475-86
pubmed: 17173634
Environ Toxicol Pharmacol. 2019 Apr;67:108-116
pubmed: 30807915
J Environ Qual. 2003 Jul-Aug;32(4):1250-7
pubmed: 12931879
J Bacteriol. 1976 Jul;127(1):536-44
pubmed: 58860
J Biol Chem. 1951 Nov;193(1):265-75
pubmed: 14907713