Advancing Understanding of Just-in-Time States for Supporting Physical Activity (Project JustWalk JITAI): Protocol for a System ID Study of Just-in-Time Adaptive Interventions.
JIT
JITAI
just-in-time
just-in-time adaptive intervention
mobile phone
needs
opportunity
physical activity
receptivity
walking
Journal
JMIR research protocols
ISSN: 1929-0748
Titre abrégé: JMIR Res Protoc
Pays: Canada
ID NLM: 101599504
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
26 Sep 2023
26 Sep 2023
Historique:
received:
26
08
2023
accepted:
30
08
2023
revised:
29
08
2023
medline:
26
9
2023
pubmed:
26
9
2023
entrez:
26
9
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Just-in-time adaptive interventions (JITAIs) are designed to provide support when individuals are receptive and can respond beneficially to the prompt. The notion of a just-in-time (JIT) state is critical for JITAIs. To date, JIT states have been formulated either in a largely data-driven way or based on theory alone. There is a need for an approach that enables rigorous theory testing and optimization of the JIT state concept. The purpose of this system ID experiment was to investigate JIT states empirically and enable the empirical optimization of a JITAI intended to increase physical activity (steps/d). We recruited physically inactive English-speaking adults aged ≥25 years who owned smartphones. Participants wore a Fitbit Versa 3 and used the study app for 270 days. The JustWalk JITAI project uses system ID methods to study JIT states. Specifically, provision of support systematically varied across different theoretically plausible operationalizations of JIT states to enable a more rigorous and systematic study of the concept. We experimentally varied 2 intervention components: notifications delivered up to 4 times per day designed to increase a person's steps within the next 3 hours and suggested daily step goals. Notifications to walk were experimentally provided across varied operationalizations of JIT states accounting for need (ie, whether daily step goals were previously met or not), opportunity (ie, whether the next 3 h were a time window during which a person had previously walked), and receptivity (ie, a person previously walked after receiving notifications). Suggested daily step goals varied systematically within a range related to a person's baseline level of steps per day (eg, 4000) until they met clinically meaningful targets (eg, averaging 8000 steps/d as the lower threshold across a cycle). A series of system ID estimation approaches will be used to analyze the data and obtain control-oriented dynamical models to study JIT states. The estimated models from all approaches will be contrasted, with the ultimate goal of guiding rigorous, replicable, empirical formulation and study of JIT states to inform a future JITAI. As is common in system ID, we conducted a series of simulation studies to formulate the experiment. The results of our simulation studies illustrated the plausibility of this approach for generating informative and unique data for studying JIT states. The study began enrolling participants in June 2022, with a final enrollment of 48 participants. Data collection concluded in April 2023. Upon completion of the analyses, the results of this study are expected to be submitted for publication in the fourth quarter of 2023. This study will be the first empirical investigation of JIT states that uses system ID methods to inform the optimization of a scalable JITAI for physical activity. ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05273437; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT05273437. DERR1-10.2196/52161.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Just-in-time adaptive interventions (JITAIs) are designed to provide support when individuals are receptive and can respond beneficially to the prompt. The notion of a just-in-time (JIT) state is critical for JITAIs. To date, JIT states have been formulated either in a largely data-driven way or based on theory alone. There is a need for an approach that enables rigorous theory testing and optimization of the JIT state concept.
OBJECTIVE
OBJECTIVE
The purpose of this system ID experiment was to investigate JIT states empirically and enable the empirical optimization of a JITAI intended to increase physical activity (steps/d).
METHODS
METHODS
We recruited physically inactive English-speaking adults aged ≥25 years who owned smartphones. Participants wore a Fitbit Versa 3 and used the study app for 270 days. The JustWalk JITAI project uses system ID methods to study JIT states. Specifically, provision of support systematically varied across different theoretically plausible operationalizations of JIT states to enable a more rigorous and systematic study of the concept. We experimentally varied 2 intervention components: notifications delivered up to 4 times per day designed to increase a person's steps within the next 3 hours and suggested daily step goals. Notifications to walk were experimentally provided across varied operationalizations of JIT states accounting for need (ie, whether daily step goals were previously met or not), opportunity (ie, whether the next 3 h were a time window during which a person had previously walked), and receptivity (ie, a person previously walked after receiving notifications). Suggested daily step goals varied systematically within a range related to a person's baseline level of steps per day (eg, 4000) until they met clinically meaningful targets (eg, averaging 8000 steps/d as the lower threshold across a cycle). A series of system ID estimation approaches will be used to analyze the data and obtain control-oriented dynamical models to study JIT states. The estimated models from all approaches will be contrasted, with the ultimate goal of guiding rigorous, replicable, empirical formulation and study of JIT states to inform a future JITAI.
RESULTS
RESULTS
As is common in system ID, we conducted a series of simulation studies to formulate the experiment. The results of our simulation studies illustrated the plausibility of this approach for generating informative and unique data for studying JIT states. The study began enrolling participants in June 2022, with a final enrollment of 48 participants. Data collection concluded in April 2023. Upon completion of the analyses, the results of this study are expected to be submitted for publication in the fourth quarter of 2023.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
This study will be the first empirical investigation of JIT states that uses system ID methods to inform the optimization of a scalable JITAI for physical activity.
TRIAL REGISTRATION
BACKGROUND
ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05273437; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT05273437.
INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID)
UNASSIGNED
DERR1-10.2196/52161.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37751237
pii: v12i1e52161
doi: 10.2196/52161
pmc: PMC10565629
doi:
Banques de données
ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT05273437']
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
e52161Informations de copyright
©Junghwan Park, Meelim Kim, Mohamed El Mistiri, Rachael Kha, Sarasij Banerjee, Lisa Gotzian, Guillaume Chevance, Daniel E Rivera, Predrag Klasnja, Eric Hekler. Originally published in JMIR Research Protocols (https://www.researchprotocols.org), 26.09.2023.
Références
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2021 Mar 1;9(3):e25289
pubmed: 33646135
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Feb 17;19(4):
pubmed: 35206455
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2022 Apr 13;10(4):e35626
pubmed: 35416777
Health Educ Behav. 2013 Aug;40(4):435-41
pubmed: 23232092
JMIR Hum Factors. 2022 Sep 9;9(3):e35693
pubmed: 36083628
Prev Med. 2008 Mar;46(3):226-31
pubmed: 18155287
Obes Rev. 2002 Feb;3(1):5-8
pubmed: 12119660
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2011 Jul 28;8:80
pubmed: 21798044
Proc Am Control Conf. 2022 Jun;2022:1392-1397
pubmed: 36238385
J Am Diet Assoc. 2008 Jun;108(6):948-59
pubmed: 18502225
JAMA. 2001 Apr 18;285(15):1987-91
pubmed: 11308435
Health Psychol. 2011 Jan;30(1):99-109
pubmed: 21299298
CMAJ. 2006 Mar 14;174(6):801-9
pubmed: 16534088
Ann Behav Med. 2019 May 3;53(6):573-582
pubmed: 30192907
Proc Am Control Conf. 2022 Jun;2022:468-473
pubmed: 36340265
Ann Behav Med. 2020 Nov 1;54(11):805-826
pubmed: 32338719
Prev Med. 2009 Oct;49(4):286-8
pubmed: 19631233
J Biomed Inform. 2018 Mar;79:82-97
pubmed: 29409750
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2009 Aug 25;6:59
pubmed: 19706192
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2008 Jan;40(1):181-8
pubmed: 18091006
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2002 Aug;34(8):1376-81
pubmed: 12165695
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 1997 May 9;46(18):393-7
pubmed: 9157273
NPJ Digit Med. 2023 Feb 1;6(1):12
pubmed: 36725977
Health Psychol. 2014 Feb;33(2):192-6
pubmed: 23421896
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2008 Jun;40(6):1188; author reply 1189
pubmed: 18496095
Psychol Health. 2011 Nov;26(11):1479-98
pubmed: 21678185
J Health Soc Behav. 1983 Dec;24(4):385-96
pubmed: 6668417
Proc Am Control Conf. 2022 Jun;2022:671-676
pubmed: 36340266
Addiction. 2022 May;117(5):1220-1241
pubmed: 34514668
IEEE Trans Control Syst Technol. 2020 Mar;28(2):331-346
pubmed: 33746479
Proc ACM Interact Mob Wearable Ubiquitous Technol. 2020 Mar;4(1):
pubmed: 34527853
Prev Med. 2009 Oct;49(4):280-2
pubmed: 19463850
Health Psychol. 2010 Nov;29(6):566-73
pubmed: 20954778
Health Educ Behav. 2013 Oct;40(1 Suppl):51S-62S
pubmed: 24084400
Can Fam Physician. 1999 Apr;45:992, 995, 1004-5
pubmed: 10216799
BMC Med. 2019 Jul 17;17(1):133
pubmed: 31311528
Am J Health Behav. 2003 Nov-Dec;27 Suppl 3:S227-32
pubmed: 14672383
Diabetes Care. 2013 Feb;36(2):228-36
pubmed: 23002086
Health Psychol. 2015 Dec;34S:1209-19
pubmed: 26651462
Ann Epidemiol. 2009 Mar;19(3):180-6
pubmed: 19217000
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2023 Jan 27;11:e44296
pubmed: 36705954
Health Psychol. 2008 May;27(3):379-87
pubmed: 18624603
Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2009 Apr;34(2):182-90
pubmed: 19370048
Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2013 Feb;38(2):100-14
pubmed: 23438219
Appl Psychol Health Well Being. 2014 Mar;6(1):1-47
pubmed: 24591064
Public Health. 2007 Dec;121(12):909-22
pubmed: 17920646
Ann Epidemiol. 1999 Nov;9(8):481-8
pubmed: 10549881
Curr Oncol Rep. 2012 Dec;14(6):550-8
pubmed: 22945451
NPJ Digit Med. 2020 Aug 27;3:110
pubmed: 32904379
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2009 Mar 31;6:21
pubmed: 19335883
Int J Chronobiol. 1976;4(2):97-110
pubmed: 1027738
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2008 Mar;34(3):381-93
pubmed: 18272806
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2010 Aug;36(8):1058-72
pubmed: 20573949
Transl Behav Med. 2016 Dec;6(4):483-495
pubmed: 27848208
Health Psychol. 2015 Dec;34S:1220-8
pubmed: 26651463
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2008 Jul 01;5:35
pubmed: 18590570
NAM Perspect. 2022 Jun 27;2022:
pubmed: 36177208
Lancet. 2014 Jul 5;384(9937):45-52
pubmed: 24996589
BMC Public Health. 2015 Apr 17;15:391
pubmed: 25887314
Br J Sports Med. 2009 Feb;43(2):81-3
pubmed: 19050003
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2003 Jun;35(6):1004-8
pubmed: 12783049
J Med Internet Res. 2018 Jun 28;20(6):e214
pubmed: 29954725
Prev Med. 2015 Mar;72:34-43
pubmed: 25579505