Do Illegitimate Tasks Lead to Work Withdrawal Behavior among Generation Z Employees in China? The Role of Perceived Insider Status and Overqualification.
Generation Z employee
illegitimate task
perceived insider status
perceived overqualification
work withdrawal behavior
Journal
Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland)
ISSN: 2076-328X
Titre abrégé: Behav Sci (Basel)
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101576826
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
23 Aug 2023
23 Aug 2023
Historique:
received:
26
07
2023
revised:
10
08
2023
accepted:
21
08
2023
medline:
27
9
2023
pubmed:
27
9
2023
entrez:
27
9
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Generation Z employees in the workplace cause a management challenge that enterprises have recently faced. The unique characteristics of Generation Z employees necessitate an urgent update to the knowledge of organizational management. However, few studies of the literature focus on the workplace behaviors of Generation Z. This study proposes that illegitimate tasks may lead to work withdrawal behavior among Generation Z employees. Based on the equity theory model, this study constructed a moderated mediation model to explore the impact of illegitimate tasks on the work withdrawal behavior of Generation Z employees, as well as the mediating role of perceived insider status and the moderating role of perceived overqualification. The analysis of survey data from 283 Generation Z employees in China at two time points found that illegitimate tasks are positively correlated with work withdrawal behavior. At the same time, the mediating role of perceived insider status was successfully confirmed. The results also showed that perceived overqualification strengthened the effect of illegitimate tasks on work withdrawal behavior and the mediating effect of perceived insider status. This study offers new insights into the management and development of Generation Z employees and the sustainable evolution of workplace relationships from both theoretical and practical perspectives.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37753980
pii: bs13090702
doi: 10.3390/bs13090702
pmc: PMC10525576
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Subventions
Organisme : National key research and development program
ID : 2021YFC3001501-04
Références
Multivariate Behav Res. 2007 Jan-Mar;42(1):185-227
pubmed: 26821081
Front Psychol. 2019 Aug 06;10:1803
pubmed: 31447740
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Jun 5;18(1):407
pubmed: 29871623
PLoS One. 2021 Jun 18;16(6):e0253447
pubmed: 34143849
J Appl Psychol. 1992 Jun;77(3):309-21
pubmed: 1601823
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1986 Dec;51(6):1173-82
pubmed: 3806354
J Occup Health Psychol. 2019 Apr;24(2):241-255
pubmed: 29683712
J Contin Educ Nurs. 2016 Jun 1;47(6):253-4
pubmed: 27232222
Work Stress. 2015 Jan 2;29(1):32-56
pubmed: 25892839
Ind Health. 2019 Sep 26;57(5):637-652
pubmed: 30674735
J Appl Psychol. 2001 Jun;86(3):386-400
pubmed: 11419799
J Appl Psychol. 2013 Mar;98(2):199-236
pubmed: 23458336
Front Psychol. 2016 Nov 21;7:1818
pubmed: 27917145
Psychol Methods. 2011 Jun;16(2):93-115
pubmed: 21500915
J Appl Psychol. 2003 Oct;88(5):879-903
pubmed: 14516251
Psychol Sci. 2008 Apr;19(4):339-47
pubmed: 18399886
J Abnorm Psychol. 1963 Nov;67:422-36
pubmed: 14081885
J Clin Nurs. 2021 Jul;30(13-14):2093-2106
pubmed: 33829574