Evaluating the Asymmetry of Muscle Activation and Strength in Paralympic Powerlifting Athletes.
asymmetry
disabled persons
force
paralympic sports
Journal
European journal of investigation in health, psychology and education
ISSN: 2254-9625
Titre abrégé: Eur J Investig Health Psychol Educ
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101751466
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 Sep 2023
01 Sep 2023
Historique:
received:
06
07
2023
revised:
10
08
2023
accepted:
28
08
2023
medline:
27
9
2023
pubmed:
27
9
2023
entrez:
27
9
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Strength training is a complex task, as it requires a combination of many variables. In paralympic powerlifting (PP) asymmetries for the evaluation of activation, and static force indicators have been increasingly studied. To investigate the asymmetries in the strength and muscle activation indicators, before and after a training session of PP athletes. Twelve elite athletes from the PP participated in the study, and asymmetry was evaluated through surface electromyography (sEMG) and static strength indicators. Evaluations were made before and after a protocol of five series of five repetitions (5 × 5), with 80% of 1-Maximum Repetition (1RM). In the pectoral muscles, there were differences in the non-dominant limbs between the before and after in the sEMG. There were differences in the pectoralis muscle in the non-dominant limb between moments before (110.75 ± 59.52%) and after (130.53 ± 98.48%, PP athletes showed small levels of asymmetry before and after training, and adaptation to training tends to promote fewer asymmetries.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Strength training is a complex task, as it requires a combination of many variables. In paralympic powerlifting (PP) asymmetries for the evaluation of activation, and static force indicators have been increasingly studied.
OBJECTIVE
OBJECTIVE
To investigate the asymmetries in the strength and muscle activation indicators, before and after a training session of PP athletes.
METHODOLOGY
METHODS
Twelve elite athletes from the PP participated in the study, and asymmetry was evaluated through surface electromyography (sEMG) and static strength indicators. Evaluations were made before and after a protocol of five series of five repetitions (5 × 5), with 80% of 1-Maximum Repetition (1RM).
RESULTS
RESULTS
In the pectoral muscles, there were differences in the non-dominant limbs between the before and after in the sEMG. There were differences in the pectoralis muscle in the non-dominant limb between moments before (110.75 ± 59.52%) and after (130.53 ± 98.48%,
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
PP athletes showed small levels of asymmetry before and after training, and adaptation to training tends to promote fewer asymmetries.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37754458
pii: ejihpe13090119
doi: 10.3390/ejihpe13090119
pmc: PMC10528492
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
1645-1654Références
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Mar 31;19(7):
pubmed: 35409809
Eur J Transl Myol. 2020 Apr 01;30(1):8892
pubmed: 32499893
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Oct 08;17(19):
pubmed: 33049982
J Sports Sci. 2021 Aug;39(16):1873-1881
pubmed: 33874850
J Bodyw Mov Ther. 2018 Jul;22(3):580-585
pubmed: 30100280
Hum Mov Sci. 2019 Apr;64:67-74
pubmed: 30660073
J Sports Sci. 2016;34(4):289-302
pubmed: 26055387
J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2001 Dec;11(6):381-6
pubmed: 11738950
J Funct Morphol Kinesiol. 2021 May 15;6(2):
pubmed: 34063420
Eur J Transl Myol. 2015 Aug 25;25(4):215-9
pubmed: 26913159
J Sports Sci Med. 2023 Mar 01;22(1):1-16
pubmed: 36876189
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jul 12;19(14):
pubmed: 35886350
Eur J Transl Myol. 2015 Sep 23;25(4):253-6
pubmed: 26913165
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2004 Apr;36(4):674-88
pubmed: 15064596
Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2019 Dec;29(12):1901-1908
pubmed: 31353627
J Neurophysiol. 2003 Sep;90(3):1503-13
pubmed: 12736237
J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2000 Oct;10(5):361-74
pubmed: 11018445
J Biomech. 2021 Jun 23;123:110523
pubmed: 34029786
Eur J Transl Myol. 2014 Mar 27;24(1):3298
pubmed: 26913129
Phys Sportsmed. 1988 Jun;16(6):69-81
pubmed: 27403692
Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2023 Aug;33(8):1473-1485
pubmed: 37186476
Sports (Basel). 2020 May 15;8(5):
pubmed: 32429176
J Neurophysiol. 2002 Nov;88(5):2408-21
pubmed: 12424282
J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2021 Feb;56:102513
pubmed: 33422743
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 May 13;18(10):
pubmed: 34067984
Br J Sports Med. 2018 Aug;52(16):1029-1030
pubmed: 29519886
Eur Radiol. 2021 Sep;31(9):6768-6779
pubmed: 33660032
J Strength Cond Res. 2023 Mar 1;37(3):555-563
pubmed: 36820703
Eur J Transl Myol. 2021 Jul 12;31(3):
pubmed: 34251162
BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil. 2022 Aug 24;14(1):159
pubmed: 36002849
Eur J Transl Myol. 2015 Aug 25;25(4):221-30
pubmed: 26913160
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2010 Jun;25(5):450-4
pubmed: 20350773
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 May 31;18(11):
pubmed: 34072883
J Strength Cond Res. 2008 Nov;22(6):1939-46
pubmed: 18978615
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Aug 18;19(16):
pubmed: 36011875
Front Psychol. 2020 Mar 03;11:175
pubmed: 32194469
Gait Posture. 2022 Jul;96:47-52
pubmed: 35569352
J Strength Cond Res. 2015 Oct;29(10):2954-63
pubmed: 25853914
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1986 Aug;67(8):530-5
pubmed: 3741078
J Hum Kinet. 2017 Jun 22;57:61-71
pubmed: 28713459
Sports (Basel). 2021 Dec 29;10(1):
pubmed: 35050971
Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2018 Mar;28(3):1281-1287
pubmed: 29161759
J Neurophysiol. 1965 May;28(3):599-620
pubmed: 5835487
Res Sports Med. 2016;24(1):54-66
pubmed: 26967311
PLoS One. 2021 Oct 13;16(10):e0257810
pubmed: 34644331
Psychol Bull. 1992 Jul;112(1):155-9
pubmed: 19565683
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2011 Sep;43(9):1725-34
pubmed: 21311352
Front Psychol. 2014 Oct 08;5:1092
pubmed: 25339923