Excreta Disgust and Adaptive Use of Ecological Sanitation By-Products: Perspectives of Rural Farmers in Burera District, Rwanda.
Ecosan
by-product
disgust
excreta
farmers
resource
sanitation
waste
Journal
International journal of environmental research and public health
ISSN: 1660-4601
Titre abrégé: Int J Environ Res Public Health
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101238455
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
12 09 2023
12 09 2023
Historique:
received:
06
03
2023
revised:
15
07
2023
accepted:
20
07
2023
medline:
4
10
2023
pubmed:
27
9
2023
entrez:
27
9
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Ecological sanitation (Ecosan) by-products are inherently limited in their potential use as excreta resources. Disgust behind human excreta and derivatives continues to challenge the further use of Ecosan-by products. Although treated excreta, including Ecosan by-products, have gradually been adopted worldwide, diverse perspectives among users hinder their use in agro-practices. This study explored perceptions of the use of Ecosan-by products as relates to the disgust of human excreta among rural farmers in Burera district, Rwanda. A qualitative study was conducted amongst three farmers' cooperatives using Ecosan by-products. We conducted six focus group discussions (FDGs) comprising a total of 48 participants taking into account the following three themes: core excreta disgust, perceived waste, and perceived resource. Thematic analysis was conducted with similar perspectives identified and grouped under emerging sub-themes. The perspectives regarding disgust elicitors included stigma, eversion, phobia, taboos, and health risks. Ecosan by-products were largely perceived as useful, with most farmers trusting and willing to touch the by-products. Psychosocial barriers to using the by-products continued to slow down the adoption of Ecosan for agricultural options. There is a need for increased awareness to scale up the use of Ecosan coupled with effective treatment practices for the products so as to reverse the psychological barriers resulting from traditional excreta disgust over Ecosan-products of faeces and urine.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37754603
pii: ijerph20186743
doi: 10.3390/ijerph20186743
pmc: PMC10530874
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Subventions
Organisme : Wellcome Trust
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Wellcome Trust
ID : 107768/Z/15/Z
Pays : United Kingdom
Références
J Water Sanit Hyg Dev. 2017 Jan 02;7(1):111-120
pubmed: 33384862
Waste Manag. 2017 Mar;61:188-194
pubmed: 27876289
Trends Cogn Sci. 2013 Aug;17(8):367-8
pubmed: 23773551
Bioresour Technol. 2005 Mar;96(4):403-11
pubmed: 15491820
Sci Total Environ. 2017 Mar 1;581-582:885-896
pubmed: 28089535
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2011 Feb 12;366(1563):389-401
pubmed: 21199843
PLoS One. 2021 Jan 11;16(1):e0245289
pubmed: 33428677
PLoS One. 2016 Aug 17;11(8):e0161262
pubmed: 27532871
Psychol Rev. 1987 Jan;94(1):23-41
pubmed: 3823304
Sci Total Environ. 2021 Apr 15;765:144438
pubmed: 33418332
Psychol Rev. 2013 Jan;120(1):65-84
pubmed: 23205888
Health Place. 2011 Jan;17(1):57-66
pubmed: 20864381
Psychol Assess. 2007 Sep;19(3):281-97
pubmed: 17845120