Skin Clearance is Associated with Reduced Treatment Failure in Patients with Psoriasis: Real-World Evidence from the CorEvitas Psoriasis Registry.

Biologic therapy CorEvitas Psoriasis Registry PASI Psoriasis Real-world evidence Skin clearance Treatment failure

Journal

Dermatology and therapy
ISSN: 2193-8210
Titre abrégé: Dermatol Ther (Heidelb)
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101590450

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Nov 2023
Historique:
received: 30 06 2023
accepted: 06 09 2023
medline: 27 9 2023
pubmed: 27 9 2023
entrez: 27 9 2023
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Complete and near-complete skin clearance have become achievable treatment goals for patients with psoriasis receiving systemic biologic therapies. However, there is limited real-world evidence regarding the impact of the degree of skin clearance on biologic treatment patterns among these patients. This longitudinal cohort study assessed the relationship between degree of skin clearance following initiation of a systemic biologic therapy and treatment failure among patients from the CorEvitas Psoriasis Registry (April 2015-August 2021). Patients had Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) score > 5 at systemic biologic therapy initiation and ≥ 1 follow-up visit(s) within 15 months of initiation. Treatment failure (discontinuation due to poor response/adverse event; addition of non-biologic therapy) and degree of skin clearance (measured by PASI) were assessed following biologic initiation. Proportional hazards regression was used to estimate the association between PASI response level and treatment failure over follow-up. This study included 2701 patient initiations from 2516 unique patients with 3846 total visits over follow-up. Over half of the patient initiations (n = 1412; 52.3%) were among patients with PASI >10. Treatment failure occurred in 1.3% of visits at which PASI100 was achieved, while those achieving PASI90 - < 100 and PASI75 - < 90 had treatment failure rates of 3.4% and 3.5%, respectively. After adjustment for confounders, the risk of treatment failure was two to three times higher in the PASI90 - < 100 (hazard ratio [HR] = 2.61; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.35, 5.02; p = 0.004) and PASI75 < 90 (HR = 2.97; CI 1.58, 5.58; p = 0.001) groups compared to the PASI100 group. The risk of treatment failure was more than 20 times higher in the < PASI75 group versus the PASI100 group (HR = 22.26; CI 13.32, 37.21; p < 0.001). The results suggest that patients are more likely to remain on a systemic biologic therapy if they achieve near-complete or complete skin clearance, supporting the continued need to target skin clearance as a treatment goal in psoriasis. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier, NCT02707341. Many people with psoriasis are often treated with biologic medications that work to improve symptoms associated with psoriasis, including inflammation. These medications can lead to clear or almost-clear skin for many people. However, there is limited information available about how achieving this goal affects whether patients continue taking their biologic medication or add a new non-biologic medication. The data source for this study was a database of patients with psoriasis (the CorEvitas Psoriasis Registry) that records how clear patients’ skin is and what medications they take. Over 1 year after starting a biologic medication, approximately 1 out of every 100 patients that achieved clear skin after taking a biologic medication stopped using that medication, and approximately 3 out of every 100 patients with almost-clear skin after taking a biologic medication stopped using that medication. Meanwhile, around 20 out of every 100 patients that did not have clear or almost-clear skin after taking a biologic medication stopped using that medication. Furthermore, patients who did not have clear or almost-clear skin after taking a biologic medication had more than 20 times greater risk of stopping their medication than those who did have clear or almost-clear skin after taking a biologic medication. These results suggest that patients are more likely to remain on their biologic medication if they experience clear or almost-clear skin after taking a biologic medication and that patients and their providers should aim for this goal when taking a biologic medication.

Autres résumés

Type: plain-language-summary (eng)
Many people with psoriasis are often treated with biologic medications that work to improve symptoms associated with psoriasis, including inflammation. These medications can lead to clear or almost-clear skin for many people. However, there is limited information available about how achieving this goal affects whether patients continue taking their biologic medication or add a new non-biologic medication. The data source for this study was a database of patients with psoriasis (the CorEvitas Psoriasis Registry) that records how clear patients’ skin is and what medications they take. Over 1 year after starting a biologic medication, approximately 1 out of every 100 patients that achieved clear skin after taking a biologic medication stopped using that medication, and approximately 3 out of every 100 patients with almost-clear skin after taking a biologic medication stopped using that medication. Meanwhile, around 20 out of every 100 patients that did not have clear or almost-clear skin after taking a biologic medication stopped using that medication. Furthermore, patients who did not have clear or almost-clear skin after taking a biologic medication had more than 20 times greater risk of stopping their medication than those who did have clear or almost-clear skin after taking a biologic medication. These results suggest that patients are more likely to remain on their biologic medication if they experience clear or almost-clear skin after taking a biologic medication and that patients and their providers should aim for this goal when taking a biologic medication.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37755689
doi: 10.1007/s13555-023-01027-6
pii: 10.1007/s13555-023-01027-6
pmc: PMC10613186
doi:

Banques de données

ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT02707341']

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

2739-2751

Informations de copyright

© 2023. The Author(s).

Références

Clin Drug Investig. 2018 Mar;38(3):191-199
pubmed: 29249053
Dermatol Ther (Heidelb). 2016 Mar;6(1):1-12
pubmed: 26714681
J Immunol. 2018 Sep 15;201(6):1605-1613
pubmed: 30181299
J Am Acad Dermatol. 2016 Jul;75(1):77-82.e7
pubmed: 27206759
Br J Dermatol. 2021 Jan;184(1):3-4
pubmed: 33029797
JAMA. 2020 May 19;323(19):1945-1960
pubmed: 32427307
JAMA Dermatol. 2021 Aug 01;157(8):940-946
pubmed: 34190957
J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2021 Oct;35(10):2034-2044
pubmed: 34076919
Br J Dermatol. 2020 May;182(5):1158-1166
pubmed: 31286471
J Am Acad Dermatol. 2014 Oct;71(4):633-41
pubmed: 24928705
Ann Rheum Dis. 2005 Mar;64 Suppl 2:ii18-23; discussion ii24-5
pubmed: 15708928
Dermatol Ther. 2015 Nov-Dec;28(6):390-403
pubmed: 26258910
J Am Acad Dermatol. 2018 Feb;78(2):323-332
pubmed: 29051036
Br J Dermatol. 2013 Aug;169(2):398-405
pubmed: 23565643
Arch Dermatol. 2001 Mar;137(3):280-4
pubmed: 11255325
J Drugs Dermatol. 2015 Oct;14(10):1086-8
pubmed: 26461817
Am J Clin Dermatol. 2017 Aug;18(4):583-590
pubmed: 28342016
Br J Dermatol. 2020 Apr;182(4):965-973
pubmed: 31325318
J Drugs Dermatol. 2020 May 1;19(5):487-492
pubmed: 32484628
BMC Dermatol. 2018 Jun 28;18(1):4
pubmed: 29954363
J Am Acad Dermatol. 2016 Jun;74(6):1057-1065.e4
pubmed: 26946986
J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2020 Nov;34(11):2566-2573
pubmed: 32364296
J Am Acad Dermatol. 2019 Apr;80(4):1029-1072
pubmed: 30772098
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2016 Jan;25(1):2-10
pubmed: 26537534
J Invest Dermatol. 2015 Apr;135(4):984-991
pubmed: 25521458
J Dermatolog Treat. 2015 Jun;26(3):235-9
pubmed: 25078334
J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2015 Apr;29(4):645-8
pubmed: 25370811
Cytokine Growth Factor Rev. 2015 Feb;26(1):25-33
pubmed: 25434285
J Dermatolog Treat. 2022 May;33(3):1661-1669
pubmed: 33615959
J Dermatolog Treat. 2017 Sep;28(6):492-499
pubmed: 28266243
Br J Dermatol. 2017 Sep;177(3):628-636
pubmed: 28513835
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2006 Jun 06;4:35
pubmed: 16756666

Auteurs

Robert R McLean (RR)

CorEvitas, LLC, 1440 Main St, Waltham, MA, 02130, USA. rmclean@corevitas.com.

Adam P Sima (AP)

CorEvitas, LLC, 1440 Main St, Waltham, MA, 02130, USA.

Silky Beaty (S)

UCB Pharma, Smyrna, GA, USA.

Robert Low (R)

UCB Pharma, Smyrna, GA, USA.

Rebecca L Spitzer (RL)

CorEvitas, LLC, 1440 Main St, Waltham, MA, 02130, USA.

Jeffrey L Stark (JL)

UCB Pharma, Smyrna, GA, USA.

Elizabeth Lesser (E)

CorEvitas, LLC, 1440 Main St, Waltham, MA, 02130, USA.

Edward Lee (E)

UCB Pharma, Smyrna, GA, USA.

April Armstrong (A)

Keck School of Medicine at the University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.

Classifications MeSH