Impedance trend from a symptomatic perielectrode cystic cavity following deep brain stimulation: illustrative case.
Parkinson’s disease
cerebral cyst
deep brain stimulation
electrode impedance
subthalamic nucleus
Journal
Journal of neurosurgery. Case lessons
ISSN: 2694-1902
Titre abrégé: J Neurosurg Case Lessons
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9918227275606676
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
18 Sep 2023
18 Sep 2023
Historique:
received:
29
06
2023
accepted:
26
07
2023
medline:
27
9
2023
pubmed:
27
9
2023
entrez:
27
9
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is a well-established neurosurgical intervention for a growing number of neurological and psychiatric diseases. Patients who are affected by Parkinson's disease may benefit from DBS of either the subthalamic nucleus or the globus pallidus internus. Patients who undergo DBS often notice a significant reduction in their clinical symptoms; however, the procedure is not without risks. Multicenter studies have reported postoperative complications such as hardware infection, intracranial hemorrhage, and perielectrode edema. The authors report a case of a perielectrode cyst managed conservatively. Tracking the impedance trend was a novel approach to monitor for changes within the cyst and to herald a clinical change in the patient. Perielectrode cystic formation can be a transient process that resolves spontaneously or with conservative, nonoperative management, and all diagnostic information is valuable in making clinical decisions. Impedance values have provided an appropriate estimation of this patient's clinical picture. The authors suggest treatment of edema and a cyst after DBS lead implantation through conservative management and observation, avoiding the removal of hardware if a patient's clinical picture is either stable or improving and forgoing additional clinical imaging if the impedance values are trending in an appropriate direction.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is a well-established neurosurgical intervention for a growing number of neurological and psychiatric diseases. Patients who are affected by Parkinson's disease may benefit from DBS of either the subthalamic nucleus or the globus pallidus internus. Patients who undergo DBS often notice a significant reduction in their clinical symptoms; however, the procedure is not without risks. Multicenter studies have reported postoperative complications such as hardware infection, intracranial hemorrhage, and perielectrode edema.
OBSERVATIONS
METHODS
The authors report a case of a perielectrode cyst managed conservatively. Tracking the impedance trend was a novel approach to monitor for changes within the cyst and to herald a clinical change in the patient. Perielectrode cystic formation can be a transient process that resolves spontaneously or with conservative, nonoperative management, and all diagnostic information is valuable in making clinical decisions.
LESSONS
CONCLUSIONS
Impedance values have provided an appropriate estimation of this patient's clinical picture. The authors suggest treatment of edema and a cyst after DBS lead implantation through conservative management and observation, avoiding the removal of hardware if a patient's clinical picture is either stable or improving and forgoing additional clinical imaging if the impedance values are trending in an appropriate direction.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37756484
doi: 10.3171/CASE23349
pii: CASE23349
pmc: PMC10555636
doi:
pii:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Références
Neurosurg Rev. 2015 Apr;38(2):245-52; discussion 252
pubmed: 25342239
World Neurosurg. 2018 Sep;117:249-254
pubmed: 29940379
J Neurosurg. 2014 Jan;120(1):132-9
pubmed: 24236657
Parkinsonism Relat Disord. 2019 Jul;64:354-355
pubmed: 31103488
Surg Neurol Int. 2021 Mar 02;12:82
pubmed: 33767886
Stereotact Funct Neurosurg. 2014;92(2):94-102
pubmed: 24503709
Eur J Neurol. 2019 Mar;26(3):533-539
pubmed: 30358915
J Neural Eng. 2006 Jun;3(2):132-8
pubmed: 16705269
Surg Neurol Int. 2020 Aug 29;11:259
pubmed: 33024597
Neurology. 2016 Nov 1;87(18):e223-e224
pubmed: 27799482