What is the optimal timing of surgery after short-course radiotherapy for rectal cancer?

BACKGROUND

Short-course neoadjuvant radiotherapy is a valuable tool in managing rectal cancers and has improved local recurrence rates. However, limited and conflicting data has resulted in variable usage and a lack of consensus on the optimal timing of surgery following short-course radiotherapy. This review aims to provide a contemporary summation of the available evidence regarding the optimal time interval between short-course neoadjuvant radiotherapy and surgery.

METHODS

A focused literature search was undertaken using the PubMed and Embase databases from January 1980 until January 2023. Randomised control trials, large observational studies and systematic reviews focusing on the use of short-course preoperative radiotherapy for localised rectal cancers, with a focus on the timing of surgery, were included. Primary outcomes were overall survival, disease-free survival and perioperative complications.

RESULTS

Five randomised control trials, two meta-analyses, and two large, population-based studies were included for their eligibility and relevance. Increased downstaging and fewer postoperative complications are demonstrated in patients receiving delayed surgery (> four weeks), but more recent data raise concerns regarding increased rates of local recurrence in this cohort. Studies directly comparing different time intervals to surgery following short-course radiotherapy have failed to demonstrate an effect on overall survival.

CONCLUSIONS

This review highlights the complexities and relative shortcomings of the available data with few high-quality studies and randomised control trials directly comparing different time intervals to surgery following short-course radiotherapy. Continuing research is needed to confirm existing findings and explore gaps in the current literature.

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Declaration of competing interest The authors declare no conflicts of interest relevant to this manuscript. No funding was sought or required for the production of this manuscript.