Coupling biomechanical models of implants with biodegradation models: A case study for biodegradable mandibular bone fixation plates.

In fracture fixation, biodegradable implant materials are an interesting alternative to conventional non-biodegradable materials as the latter often require a second implant removal surgery to avoid long-term complications. In this study, we present an in silico strategy to design/study biodegradable metal implants focusing on mandibular fracture fixation plates of WE43 (Mg alloy). The in silico strategy is composed of an orchestrated interaction between three separate computational models. The first model simulates the mass loss of the degradable implant based on the chemistry of Mg biodegradation. A second model estimates the loading on the jaw plate in the physiological environment, incorporating a phenomenological dynamic bone regeneration process. The third model characterizes the mechanical behavior of the jaw plate and the influence of material degradation on the mechanical behavior. A sensitivity analysis was performed on parameters related to choices regarding numerical implementation and parameter dependencies were implemented to guarantee robust and correct results. Different clinical scenarios were tested, related to the amount of screws used to fix the plate. The results showed a lower initial strength when more screw holes were left open, as well as a faster decrease over time in strength due to the increased area available for surface degradation. The obtained degradation results were found to be in accordance with previously reported data of in vivo studies with biodegradable plates. The combination of these three models allows for the design of patient-specific biodegradable fixation implants able to deliver the desired mechanical behavior tuned to the bone regeneration process.

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.