Safety and success of transvenous lead extraction using excimer laser sheaths: a meta-analysis of over 1700 patients.
Cardiac implantable electronic devices
Excimer laser sheath
GlideLight
SLS II
Transvenous lead extraction
Journal
Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology
ISSN: 1532-2092
Titre abrégé: Europace
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100883649
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
02 Nov 2023
02 Nov 2023
Historique:
received:
07
08
2023
accepted:
24
09
2023
medline:
27
11
2023
pubmed:
28
9
2023
entrez:
27
9
2023
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
While numerous studies have demonstrated favourable safety and efficacy of the excimer laser sheath for transvenous lead extraction (TLE) in smaller cohorts, comprehensive large-scale investigations with contemporary data remain scarce. This study aims to evaluate the safety and performance of laser-assisted TLE through a meta-analysis of contemporary data. A systematic literature search was conducted to identify articles that assessed the safety and performance of the spectranetics laser sheath (SLS) II and GlideLight Excimer laser sheaths in TLE procedures between 1 April 2016 and 31 March 2021. Safety outcomes included procedure-related death and major/minor complications. Performance outcomes included procedural and clinical success rates. A random-effects, inverse-variance-weighting meta-analysis was performed to obtain the weighted average of the evaluated outcomes. In total, 17 articles were identified and evaluated, including 1729 patients with 2887 leads. Each patient, on average, had 2.3 ± 0.3 leads with a dwell time of 7.9 ± 3.0 years. The TLE procedural successes rate was 96.8% [1440/1505; 95% CI: (94.9-98.2%)] per patient and 96.3% [1447/1501; 95% CI: (94.8-97.4%)] per lead, and the clinical success rate per patient was 98.3% [989/1010, 95% CI: (97.4-99.0%)]. The procedure-related death rate was 0.08% [7/1729, 95% CI: (0.00%, 0.34%)], with major and minor complication rates of 1.9% [41/1729; 95% CI: (1.2-2.8%)] and 1.9% [58/1729; 95% CI: (0.8-3.6%)], respectively. This meta-analysis demonstrated that excimer laser sheath-assisted TLE has high success and low procedural mortality rates. It provides clinicians with a reliable and valuable resource for extracting indwelling cardiac leads which require advanced extraction techniques.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37757839
pii: 7283882
doi: 10.1093/europace/euad298
pmc: PMC10655058
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Meta-Analysis
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Subventions
Organisme : Philips North America LLC
Informations de copyright
© The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Conflict of interest: Christopher Aldo Rinaldi, MD has received Honoraria/Speakers fees from Philips. Igor Diemberger, MD has received Speaker fees from Biotronik, Medtronic, and Philips. Mauro Biffi, MD has received a Speakers fee from Philips. Yu-Rong Gao, PhD, MBA is an employee of Philips. Enoch Sizto, MD, MBA is an employee of Philips. Nancy Jin, MS is an employee of Philips. Laurence M. Epstein, MD has received Honoraria/Speaker fees from Philips, Medtronic, and Boston Scientific. Pascal Defaye, MD has no conflict of interest.
Références
Ecology. 2011 Jan;92(1):3-10
pubmed: 21560670
J Cardiol. 2020 Apr;75(4):410-414
pubmed: 31606246
Europace. 2018 Jun 1;20(6):1018-1027
pubmed: 29016771
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2012 Jun;35(6):641-7
pubmed: 22432739
Heart Rhythm. 2017 Dec;14(12):e503-e551
pubmed: 28919379
Europace. 2013 Aug;15(8):1174
pubmed: 23362017
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013 Mar 5;61(9):987-9
pubmed: 23449433
J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2018 Apr;51(3):253-261
pubmed: 29476380
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2021 May;44(5):895-902
pubmed: 33675073
Eur Heart J. 2017 Oct 21;38(40):2995-3005
pubmed: 28369414
Stat Med. 2009 Feb 28;28(5):721-38
pubmed: 19072749
J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2019 Aug;55(2):129-135
pubmed: 31025152
Semin Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2017 Dec;21(4):302-311
pubmed: 28933249
Europace. 2019 Apr 1;21(4):645-654
pubmed: 30624715
Neth Heart J. 2022 May;30(5):267-272
pubmed: 34932200
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2019 May 1;28(5):704-708
pubmed: 30597017
Europace. 2017 Oct 01;19(10):1710-1716
pubmed: 27733470
PLoS One. 2021 May 14;16(5):e0251829
pubmed: 33989335
Expert Rev Med Devices. 2013 Jul;10(4):551-73
pubmed: 23895081
Anesth Analg. 2018 Feb;126(2):406-412
pubmed: 28991113
J Innov Card Rhythm Manag. 2017 Jun 15;8(6):2758-2764
pubmed: 32494456
Heart Rhythm. 2023 Jan;20(1):142-143
pubmed: 35931414
Expert Rev Med Devices. 2017 Jun;14(6):469-480
pubmed: 28521596
Card Electrophysiol Clin. 2018 Mar;10(1):59-66
pubmed: 29428142
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2021 Apr 8;32(3):402-407
pubmed: 33257960
J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2023 Aug;66(5):1067-1075
pubmed: 34839431
Health Sci Rep. 2020 Jul 27;3(3):e178
pubmed: 32728636
Europace. 2009 Feb;11(2):213-5
pubmed: 19168497
Europace. 2021 Sep 8;23(9):1462-1471
pubmed: 33615342
JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2019 Jun;5(6):665-670
pubmed: 31221352
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2021 Jul;32(7):1969-1978
pubmed: 34028112
Card Electrophysiol Clin. 2018 Dec;10(4):651-657
pubmed: 30396579
Europace. 2020 Nov 1;22(11):1718-1728
pubmed: 32688392
Europace. 2019 Nov 1;21(11):1703-1709
pubmed: 31545350
Europace. 2018 Nov 1;20(11):1733-1740
pubmed: 29452360
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2021 Apr;44(4):601-606
pubmed: 33594705
Europace. 2015 May;17(5):689-700
pubmed: 25687745
Europace. 2020 Jun 1;22(6):989
pubmed: 32087009
Europace. 2014 Oct;16(10):1490-5
pubmed: 25087154
Europace. 2018 Jul 1;20(7):1217
pubmed: 29566158
Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2019 Aug;12(8):e007266
pubmed: 31401856
Europace. 2023 Feb 16;25(2):591-599
pubmed: 36352816
Europace. 2014 Jan;16(1):81-7
pubmed: 23794614
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2017 Jan;24(1):77-81
pubmed: 27624353
Europace. 2018 Mar 1;20(3):e21-e29
pubmed: 28339860