Emergency resection is an independent risk factor for decreased long-term overall survival in colorectal cancer: a matched-pair analysis.


Journal

World journal of surgical oncology
ISSN: 1477-7819
Titre abrégé: World J Surg Oncol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101170544

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
28 Sep 2023
Historique:
received: 12 04 2023
accepted: 11 09 2023
medline: 20 11 2023
pubmed: 28 9 2023
entrez: 27 9 2023
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Colorectal cancer is one of the most common malignant neoplasms worldwide. Up to 30% of the patients present in an emergency setting despite an established screening program. Emergency colorectal resection is associated with increased mortality and morbidity as well as worse oncological outcome. This study aims to analyze the impact on tumor recurrence and survival in patients with an emergency colorectal resection, independent of sex, age, and tumor stage. Patients, who underwent an oncological resection for colorectal cancer at the Medical University of Innsbruck, Department of Visceral, Transplant and Thoracic Surgery, between January 2003 and December 2018 were analyzed retrospectively and screened for emergency resections. Matched pairs were formed to analyze the impact of emergency operations on long-term outcomes, considering tumor stage, sex, and age, comparing it with elective patients. In total, 4.5% out of 1297 patients underwent surgery in an emergency setting. These patients had higher UICC (Union internationale contre le cancer) stages than elective patients. After matching the patients for age, sex, and tumor stage, emergency patients still had higher mortality. The incidence of recurrence was higher (47.5% vs. 25.4%, p = 0.003) and the 5-year overall survival decreased (35.6% vs. 64.4%, p < 0.001) compared to the matched patients with elective resection. Correcting for 90-day mortality still a reduction in the 5-year overall survival was demonstrated (44% vs. 70%, p = 0,001). The left-sided colon tumors were more common in the emergency group (45.8% vs. 25.4%, p = 0.006) and the rectal tumors in the elective one (21.2% vs. 3.4%, p = 0.002). Patients undergoing emergency resection for colorectal cancer have a decreased tumor-specific and overall survival compared to patients after elective resection, independent of age, sex, and tumor stage, even after correcting for 90-day mortality. These findings confirm the importance of colorectal cancer awareness and screening to reduce emergency resections.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Colorectal cancer is one of the most common malignant neoplasms worldwide. Up to 30% of the patients present in an emergency setting despite an established screening program. Emergency colorectal resection is associated with increased mortality and morbidity as well as worse oncological outcome. This study aims to analyze the impact on tumor recurrence and survival in patients with an emergency colorectal resection, independent of sex, age, and tumor stage.
METHODS METHODS
Patients, who underwent an oncological resection for colorectal cancer at the Medical University of Innsbruck, Department of Visceral, Transplant and Thoracic Surgery, between January 2003 and December 2018 were analyzed retrospectively and screened for emergency resections. Matched pairs were formed to analyze the impact of emergency operations on long-term outcomes, considering tumor stage, sex, and age, comparing it with elective patients.
RESULTS RESULTS
In total, 4.5% out of 1297 patients underwent surgery in an emergency setting. These patients had higher UICC (Union internationale contre le cancer) stages than elective patients. After matching the patients for age, sex, and tumor stage, emergency patients still had higher mortality. The incidence of recurrence was higher (47.5% vs. 25.4%, p = 0.003) and the 5-year overall survival decreased (35.6% vs. 64.4%, p < 0.001) compared to the matched patients with elective resection. Correcting for 90-day mortality still a reduction in the 5-year overall survival was demonstrated (44% vs. 70%, p = 0,001). The left-sided colon tumors were more common in the emergency group (45.8% vs. 25.4%, p = 0.006) and the rectal tumors in the elective one (21.2% vs. 3.4%, p = 0.002).
CONCLUSION CONCLUSIONS
Patients undergoing emergency resection for colorectal cancer have a decreased tumor-specific and overall survival compared to patients after elective resection, independent of age, sex, and tumor stage, even after correcting for 90-day mortality. These findings confirm the importance of colorectal cancer awareness and screening to reduce emergency resections.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37759235
doi: 10.1186/s12957-023-03182-8
pii: 10.1186/s12957-023-03182-8
pmc: PMC10537584
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

310

Informations de copyright

© 2023. The Author(s).

Références

J Gastrointest Surg. 2017 Mar;21(3):543-553
pubmed: 28083841
World J Gastroenterol. 2015 May 7;21(17):5167-75
pubmed: 25954090
Dis Colon Rectum. 2009 Dec;52(12):1982-91
pubmed: 19959975
BMC Health Serv Res. 2012 Mar 26;12:77
pubmed: 22448728
CA Cancer J Clin. 2021 May;71(3):209-249
pubmed: 33538338
Ann Surg. 2016 Feb;263(2):326-36
pubmed: 25575264
Arch Surg. 2010 Jan;145(1):79-86
pubmed: 20083758
Curr Oncol. 2021 Jun 03;28(3):2079-2086
pubmed: 34204959
Am J Surg. 2015 Feb;209(2):246-53
pubmed: 25457246
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2020 Feb;405(1):71-80
pubmed: 32002628
Int J Cancer. 2017 Nov 15;141(10):1942-1949
pubmed: 28599355
Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2018 Dec;61(12):1491-1499
pubmed: 30406892
Transl Cancer Res. 2021 May;10(5):2108-2119
pubmed: 35116531
Br J Cancer. 2013 Oct 15;109(8):2027-34
pubmed: 24045658
World J Gastroenterol. 2019 Aug 21;25(31):4383-4404
pubmed: 31496619
BMC Cancer. 2016 Mar 11;16:208
pubmed: 26968526
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2014 May;29(5):591-8
pubmed: 24651957
World J Gastroenterol. 2017 May 28;23(20):3632-3642
pubmed: 28611516
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2018 Nov;33(11):1525-1532
pubmed: 29946860
World J Surg Oncol. 2021 Apr 5;19(1):96
pubmed: 33820567
N Engl J Med. 2022 Oct 27;387(17):1547-1556
pubmed: 36214590
J Gastrointest Oncol. 2017 Oct;8(5):842-849
pubmed: 29184688

Auteurs

Katharina Esswein (K)

Department of Visceral, Transplant and Thoracic Surgery, Center of Operative Medicine, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.

Marijana Ninkovic (M)

Department of Visceral, Transplant and Thoracic Surgery, Center of Operative Medicine, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.

Elisabeth Gasser (E)

Department of Visceral, Transplant and Thoracic Surgery, Center of Operative Medicine, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.

Lars Barenberg (L)

Department of Visceral, Transplant and Thoracic Surgery, Center of Operative Medicine, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.

Alexander Perathoner (A)

Department of Visceral, Transplant and Thoracic Surgery, Center of Operative Medicine, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.

Reinhold Kafka-Ritsch (R)

Department of Visceral, Transplant and Thoracic Surgery, Center of Operative Medicine, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria. reinhold.kafka-ritsch@tirol-kliniken.at.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH