Rectal progesterone administration secures a high ongoing pregnancy rate in a personalized Hormone Replacement Therapy Frozen Embryo Transfer (HRT-FET) protocol: a prospective interventional study.
HRT-FET
low serum progesterone
luteal phase rescue
ongoing pregnancy
rectal progesterone
vaginal progesterone
Journal
Human reproduction (Oxford, England)
ISSN: 1460-2350
Titre abrégé: Hum Reprod
Pays: England
ID NLM: 8701199
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
02 11 2023
02 11 2023
Historique:
received:
23
04
2023
revised:
11
08
2023
medline:
8
11
2023
pubmed:
28
9
2023
entrez:
27
9
2023
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Can supplementation with rectal administration of progesterone secure high ongoing pregnancy rates (OPRs) in patients with low serum progesterone (P4) on the day of blastocyst transfer (ET)? Rectally administered progesterone commencing on the ET day secures high OPRs in patients with serum P4 levels below 35 nmol/l (11 ng/ml). Low serum P4 levels at peri-implantation in Hormone Replacement Therapy Frozen Embryo Transfer (HRT-FET) cycles impact reproductive outcomes negatively. However, studies have shown that patients with low P4 after a standard vaginal progesterone treatment can obtain live birth rates (LBRs) comparable to patients with optimal P4 levels if they receive additionalsubcutaneous progesterone, starting around the day of blastocyst transfer. In contrast, increasing vaginal progesterone supplementation in low serum P4 patients does not increase LBR. Another route of administration rarely used in ART is the rectal route, despite the fact that progesterone is well absorbed and serum P4 levels reach a maximum level after ∼2 h. This prospective interventional study included a cohort of 488 HRT-FET cycles, in which a total of 374 patients had serum P4 levels ≥35 nmol/l (11 ng/ml) at ET, and 114 patients had serum P4 levels <35 nmol/l (11 ng/ml). The study was conducted from January 2020 to November 2022. Patients underwent HRT-FET in a public Fertility Clinic, and endometrial preparation included oral oestradiol (6 mg/24 h), followed by vaginal micronized progesterone, 400 mg/12 h. Blastocyst transfer and P4 measurements were performed on the sixth day of progesterone administration. In patients with serum P4 <35 nmol/l (11 ng/ml), 'rescue' was performed by rectal administration of progesterone (400 mg/12 h) starting that same day. In pregnant patients, rectal administration continued until Week 8 of gestation, and oestradiol and vaginal progesterone treatment continued until Week 10 of gestation. Among 488 HRT-FET single blastocyst transfers, the mean age of the patients at oocyte retrieval (OR) was 30.9 ± 4.6 years and the mean BMI at ET 25.1 ± 3.5 kg/m2. The mean serum P4 level after vaginal progesterone administration on the day of ET was 48.9 ± 21.0 nmol/l (15.4 ± 6.6 ng/ml), and a total of 23% (114/488) of the patients had a serum P4 level lower than 35 nmol/l (11 ng/ml). The overall, positive hCG rate, clinical pregnancy rate, OPR week 12, and total pregnancy loss rate were 66% (320/488), 54% (265/488), 45% (221/488), and 31% (99/320), respectively. There was no significant difference in either OPR week 12 or total pregnancy loss rate between patients with P4 ≥35 nmol/l (11 ng/ml) and patients with P4 <35 nmol/l, who received rescue in terms of rectally administered progesterone, 45% versus 46%, P = 0.77 and 30% versus 34%, P = 0.53, respectively. OPR did not differ whether patients had initially low P4 and rectal rescue or were above the P4 cut-off. Logistic regression analysis showed that only age at OR and blastocyst scoring correlated with OPR week 12, independently of other factors like BMI and vitrification day of blastocysts (Day 5 or 6). In this study, vaginal micronized progesterone pessaries, a solid pessary with progesterone suspended in vegetable hard fat, were used vaginally as well as rectally. It is unknown whether other vaginal progesterone products, such as capsules, gel, or tablet, could be used rectally with the same rescue effect. A substantial part of HRT-FET patients receiving vaginal progesterone treatment has lowserum P4. Adding rectally administered progesterone in these patients increases the reproductive outcome. Importantly, rectal progesterone administration is considered convenient, and progesterone pessaries are easy to administer rectally and of low cost. Gedeon Richter Nordic supported the study with an unrestricted grant as well as study medication. B.A. has received unrestricted grant from Gedeon Richter Nordic and Merck and honoraria for lectures from Gedeon Richter, Merck, IBSA and Marckyrl Pharma. P.H. has received honoraria for lectures from Gedeon Richter, Merck, IBSA and U.S.K. has received grant from Gedeon Richter Nordic, IBSA and Merck for studies outside this work and honoraria for teaching from Merck and Thillotts Pharma AB and conference expenses covered by Merck. The other co-authors have no conflict of interest to declare. EudraCT no.: 2019-001539-29.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37759346
pii: 7284352
doi: 10.1093/humrep/dead185
pmc: PMC10628493
doi:
Substances chimiques
Progesterone
4G7DS2Q64Y
Estradiol
4TI98Z838E
Banques de données
EudraCT
['2019-001539-29']
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
2221-2229Informations de copyright
© The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology.
Références
J Reprod Med. 1987 Jun;32(6):443-8
pubmed: 3612635
Hum Reprod. 2021 Feb 18;36(3):683-692
pubmed: 33340402
Gynecol Endocrinol. 2019 May;35(5):439-442
pubmed: 30585507
Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 1999 Jun;11(3):307-11
pubmed: 10369209
Reprod Biomed Online. 2022 Feb;44(2):261-270
pubmed: 34924287
Fertil Steril. 2012 Nov;98(5):1165-9
pubmed: 22840239
Fertil Steril. 2022 Jan;117(1):96-103
pubmed: 34548167
Reprod Biomed Online. 2023 Jan;46(1):92-98
pubmed: 36216661
Hum Reprod. 2018 Nov 1;33(11):2131-2140
pubmed: 30265306
Methods Mol Biol. 2017;1568:281-295
pubmed: 28421505
Reprod Med Biol. 2018 Nov 01;18(1):91-96
pubmed: 30655726
Hum Reprod. 2021 Oct 18;36(11):2861-2870
pubmed: 34382075
Hum Reprod. 2021 May 17;36(6):1552-1560
pubmed: 33686413
Reprod Biomed Online. 2020 Jun;40(6):797-804
pubmed: 32386938
Reprod Biomed Online. 2020 Jun;40(6):805-811
pubmed: 32376312
Fertil Steril. 2023 Jun;119(6):954-963
pubmed: 36781098
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2012 Oct;286(4):1049-54
pubmed: 22714063
Hum Reprod. 2022 Oct 31;37(11):2570-2577
pubmed: 36125015
Hum Reprod. 2017 Dec 01;32(12):2437-2442
pubmed: 29040638
Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2021 Feb 18;19(1):24
pubmed: 33602270
Fertil Steril. 2021 Dec;116(6):1534-1556
pubmed: 34384594
Reprod Biomed Online. 2019 Mar;38(3):472-480
pubmed: 30642638
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1971 Jun 15;110(4):470-7
pubmed: 5582003
Reprod Biomed Online. 2021 Jul;43(1):45-51
pubmed: 34016521
Reprod Biomed Online. 2022 Oct;45(4):785-792
pubmed: 35810079
Reprod Biomed Online. 2015 Aug;31(2):180-91
pubmed: 26099447
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2022 Jun 10;13:892753
pubmed: 35757393
Reprod Biomed Online. 2018 Nov;37(5):641-647
pubmed: 30385142