Features of Protein Unfolding Transitions and Their Relation to Domain Topology Probed by Single-Molecule FRET.
domain topology
molten globule intermediate state
protein folding
single-molecule Förster resonance energy transfer
unfolding/folding-induced conformational changes
Journal
Biomolecules
ISSN: 2218-273X
Titre abrégé: Biomolecules
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101596414
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
22 Aug 2023
22 Aug 2023
Historique:
received:
28
06
2023
revised:
10
08
2023
accepted:
19
08
2023
medline:
28
9
2023
pubmed:
28
9
2023
entrez:
28
9
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
A protein fold is defined as a structural arrangement of a secondary structure in a three-dimensional space. It would be interesting to know whether a particular fold can be assigned to certain features of the corresponding folding/unfolding transitions. To understand the underlying principles of the manifold folding transitions in more detail, single-molecule FRET is the method of choice. Taking the two-domain protein phosphoglycerate kinase (PGK) as an example, we investigated denaturant-induced unfolded states of PGK using the above method. For this purpose, different intramolecular distances within the two domains were measured. In addition to the known two-state transition, a transition with a compact folding intermediate was also identified in each of the two domains. Based on the structural homology of the domains (characterized by a Rossmann fold) and the striking similarity in the features of the measured distance changes during unfolding, clear evidence emerged that the underlying domain topology plays an important role in determining the observed structural changes.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37759680
pii: biom13091280
doi: 10.3390/biom13091280
pmc: PMC10526189
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Subventions
Organisme : DFG
ID : FI 841/10-1
Références
Curr Opin Struct Biol. 2008 Feb;18(1):16-26
pubmed: 18221865
Biophys J. 2005 Nov;89(5):3508-22
pubmed: 16113120
Annu Rev Biophys Biomol Struct. 1995;24:495-522
pubmed: 7663125
Biochemistry. 1990 Sep 18;29(37):8683-9
pubmed: 2271549
Biophys J. 2020 Feb 4;118(3):688-697
pubmed: 31916943
Chemphyschem. 2011 Feb 25;12(3):704-10
pubmed: 21344599
J Phys Chem B. 2018 Dec 13;122(49):11251-11261
pubmed: 30156409
J Mol Biol. 2015 Sep 25;427(19):3148-57
pubmed: 26163276
EMBO J. 1982;1(12):1635-40
pubmed: 6765200
Methods Mol Biol. 2022;2376:207-233
pubmed: 34845612
FEBS Lett. 1990 Mar 12;262(1):20-4
pubmed: 2318308
J Mol Biol. 1995 Apr 7;247(4):536-40
pubmed: 7723011
J Biol Chem. 2006 Aug 25;281(34):24375-80
pubmed: 16807241
J R Soc Interface. 2008 Jan 6;5(18):15-45
pubmed: 17519204
Anal Bioanal Chem. 2013 Jul;405(18):5983-91
pubmed: 23649926
Molecules. 2014 Nov 25;19(12):19269-91
pubmed: 25429558
J Am Chem Soc. 2012 Aug 1;134(30):12565-77
pubmed: 22747188
Biophys J. 2018 Apr 10;114(7):1518-1528
pubmed: 29642023
Protein Sci. 2005 Jun;14(6):1609-16
pubmed: 15883189
Curr Opin Struct Biol. 2018 Feb;48:30-39
pubmed: 29080467
FEBS Lett. 1994 Mar 14;341(1):15-8
pubmed: 8137915
Bioconjug Chem. 2002 Sep-Oct;13(5):1163-70
pubmed: 12236801
Protein Sci. 2018 Jan;27(1):129-134
pubmed: 28875543