A Diagnostic Accuracy Study of Targeted and Systematic Biopsies to Detect Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer, including a Model for the Partial Omission of Systematic Biopsies.

clinically significant prostate cancer detection prostate biopsy concordance systematic biopsy targeted biopsy

Journal

Cancers
ISSN: 2072-6694
Titre abrégé: Cancers (Basel)
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101526829

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
13 Sep 2023
Historique:
received: 22 06 2023
revised: 16 08 2023
accepted: 12 09 2023
medline: 28 9 2023
pubmed: 28 9 2023
entrez: 28 9 2023
Statut: epublish

Résumé

The primary objective of this study was to analyse the current accuracy of targeted and systematic prostate biopsies in detecting csPCa. A secondary objective was to determine whether there are factors predicting the finding of csPCa in targeted biopsies and, if so, to explore the utility of a predictive model for csPCa detection only in targeted biopsies. We analysed 2122 men with suspected PCa, serum PSA > 3 ng/mL, and/or a suspicious digital rectal examination (DRE), who underwent targeted and systematic biopsies between 2021 and 2022. CsPCa (grade group 2 or higher) was detected in 1026 men (48.4%). Discrepancies in csPCa detection in targeted and systematic biopsies were observed in 49.6%, with 13.9% of csPCa cases being detected only in systematic biopsies and 35.7% only in targeted biopsies. A predictive model for csPCa detection only in targeted biopsies was developed from the independent predictors age (years), prostate volume (mL), PI-RADS score (3 to 5), mpMRI Tesla (1.5 vs. 3.0), TRUS-MRI fusion image technique (cognitive vs. software), and prostate biopsy route (transrectal vs. transperineal). The csPCa discrimination ability of targeted biopsies showed an AUC of 0.741 (95% CI 0.721-0.762). The avoidance rate of systematic prostate biopsies went from 0.5% without missing csPCa to 18.3% missing 4.6% of csPCa cases. We conclude that the csPCa diagnostic accuracy of targeted biopsies is higher than that of systematic biopsies. However, a significant rate of csPCa remains detected only in systematic biopsies. A predictive model for the partial omission of systematic biopsies was developed.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37760511
pii: cancers15184543
doi: 10.3390/cancers15184543
pmc: PMC10526349
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Subventions

Organisme : Instituto de Salut Carlos III (SP)
ID : PI20-01666

Références

Eur Urol Oncol. 2023 Apr;6(2):234
pubmed: 36894492
Actas Urol Esp (Engl Ed). 2019 Dec;43(10):573-578
pubmed: 31679807
Eur Urol Open Sci. 2021 Apr 19;28:9-16
pubmed: 34337520
N Engl J Med. 2018 May 10;378(19):1767-1777
pubmed: 29552975
Eur Urol. 2019 Sep;76(3):284-303
pubmed: 31130434
Cancers (Basel). 2022 Mar 21;14(6):
pubmed: 35326740
N Engl J Med. 2022 Dec 8;387(23):2126-2137
pubmed: 36477032
J Urol. 2022 Jan;207(1):95-107
pubmed: 34433302
Q J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2022 Mar;66(1):67-73
pubmed: 31359744
Lancet. 2017 Feb 25;389(10071):815-822
pubmed: 28110982
World J Urol. 2017 Aug;35(8):1199-1203
pubmed: 27987032
J Nucl Med. 2019 Jul;60(7):944-949
pubmed: 30552201
Lancet Oncol. 2019 Jan;20(1):100-109
pubmed: 30470502
CA Cancer J Clin. 2021 May;71(3):209-249
pubmed: 33538338
Int Urol Nephrol. 2022 Oct;54(10):2477-2483
pubmed: 35877030
J Urol. 2022 Aug;208(2):292-300
pubmed: 35422134
Eur Urol. 2017 Mar;71(3):353-365
pubmed: 27543165
J Urol. 2022 Oct;208(4):830-837
pubmed: 36082555
Nat Rev Urol. 2022 Sep;19(9):562-572
pubmed: 35974245
Minerva Urol Nephrol. 2021 Jun;73(3):357-366
pubmed: 33769008
Scand J Urol. 2018 Jun;52(3):174-179
pubmed: 29463177
N Engl J Med. 2021 Sep 2;385(10):908-920
pubmed: 34237810
Eur Urol. 2022 Sep;82(3):303-310
pubmed: 35115177
JAMA Surg. 2019 Sep 1;154(9):811-818
pubmed: 31188412
Eur Urol. 2013 Dec;64(6):876-92
pubmed: 23787356
Eur Urol. 2020 Jan;77(1):78-94
pubmed: 31326219
Cancers (Basel). 2022 Oct 18;14(20):
pubmed: 36291883
Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2009 Apr;6(4):197-206
pubmed: 19333226
BJUI Compass. 2022 Dec 28;4(3):266-268
pubmed: 37025471
Am J Surg Pathol. 2016 Feb;40(2):244-52
pubmed: 26492179
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2021 Feb;48(2):483-492
pubmed: 32734457
Curr Oncol. 2021 Mar 22;28(2):1294-1301
pubmed: 33809967
Epidemiol Infect. 2016 Jun;144(8):1784-91
pubmed: 26645476
Eur Urol Oncol. 2019 Nov;2(6):664-669
pubmed: 31411977
Nat Rev Urol. 2023 Apr;20(4):241-258
pubmed: 36653670
Eur Urol. 2020 May;77(5):e138-e139
pubmed: 32089360

Auteurs

Juan Morote (J)

Department of Urology, Vall d'Hebron Hospital, 08035 Barcelona, Spain.
Department of Surgery, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, 08193 Bellaterra, Spain.

Natàlia Picola (N)

Department of Urology, Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge, 08907 Hospitalet de Llobregat, Spain.

Jesús Muñoz-Rodriguez (J)

Department of Urology, Hospital Universitari Parc Taulí, 08208 Sabadell, Spain.

Nahuel Paesano (N)

Clínica Creu Blanca, 08034 Barcelona, Spain.

Xavier Ruiz-Plazas (X)

Department of Urology, Hospital Universitari Joan XXIII, 43005 Tarragona, Spain.

Marta V Muñoz-Rivero (MV)

Department of Urology, Hospital Arnau de Vilanova, 25198 Lleida, Spain.

Anna Celma (A)

Department of Urology, Vall d'Hebron Hospital, 08035 Barcelona, Spain.
Department of Surgery, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, 08193 Bellaterra, Spain.

Gemma García-de Manuel (GG)

Department of Urology, Hospital Universitari Josep Trueta, 17007 Girona, Spain.

Ignacio Aisian (I)

Department of Urology, Hospital Clinic, 08036 Barcelona, Spain.

Pol Servian (P)

Department of Urology, Hospital Germans Trias i Pujol, 08916 Badalona, Spain.

José M Abascal (JM)

Department of Urology, Parc de Salut Mar, 08003 Barcelona, Spain.
Department of Medicine and Health Science, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, 08003 Barcelona, Spain.

Classifications MeSH