Exploring Internal Conflicts and Collaboration of a Hospital Home Healthcare Team: A Grounded Theory Approach.

grounded theory home healthcare hospital home healthcare teams internal conflict team collaboration

Journal

Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland)
ISSN: 2227-9032
Titre abrégé: Healthcare (Basel)
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101666525

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
07 Sep 2023
Historique:
received: 26 07 2023
revised: 04 09 2023
accepted: 04 09 2023
medline: 28 9 2023
pubmed: 28 9 2023
entrez: 28 9 2023
Statut: epublish

Résumé

An aging society is on the rise, leading to a variety of caregiving issues. The Taiwanese government has been implementing a home healthcare integration plan since 2015, aimed at integrating and forming interdisciplinary care teams with medical institutions. This study explores the internal conflict factors among hospital home healthcare team members at a district teaching hospital in Taichung, Taiwan, and it seeks a better collaboration model between them. Semi-structured in-depth interviews were conducted with seven hospital home healthcare team members. Data analysis was based on grounded theory, with research quality relying on the triangulation and consistency analysis methods. The results show that "work overload", "resource overuse", "inconsistent assessment", "limited resources", "communication cost", and "lack of incentives" are the major conflicts among the team. This study proposed the following collaboration model, including "identifying the internal stakeholders of a home healthcare team" and "the key stakeholders as referral coordinators", "patient-centered resource allocation", and "teamwork orientation". The study recommends that within a teamwork-oriented home healthcare team, its members should proactively demonstrate their role responsibilities and actively provide support to one another. Only through patient-centered resource allocation and mutual respect can the goal of seamless home healthcare be achieved. The content of the research and samples were approved by the hospital ethics committee (REC108-18).

Identifiants

pubmed: 37761676
pii: healthcare11182478
doi: 10.3390/healthcare11182478
pmc: PMC10530701
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Références

J Multidiscip Healthc. 2021 Aug 07;14:2101-2110
pubmed: 34393489
Clin Med (Lond). 2010 Jun;10(3):235-7
pubmed: 20726451
BMC Public Health. 2015 Apr 11;15:359
pubmed: 25885473
J Clin Nurs. 2011 Feb;20(3-4):454-63
pubmed: 20412357
Scientifica (Cairo). 2016;2016:2056470
pubmed: 27127677
J Infus Nurs. 2017 Jul/Aug;40(4):215-223
pubmed: 28683000
Health Soc Work. 2001 Aug;26(3):136-49
pubmed: 11531189
Int J Integr Care. 2016 Oct 28;16(4):6
pubmed: 28316546
Hu Li Za Zhi. 2018 Feb;65(1):11-16
pubmed: 29405015
J Gen Intern Med. 2017 Oct;32(10):1114-1121
pubmed: 28707258
Cureus. 2023 May 5;15(5):e38617
pubmed: 37284412
Biosci Trends. 2019;13(3):279-281
pubmed: 31327797
Healthcare (Basel). 2020 Sep 06;8(3):
pubmed: 32899937
Healthcare (Basel). 2022 May 31;10(6):
pubmed: 35742072
Hu Li Za Zhi. 2018 Feb;65(1):24-32
pubmed: 29405017
Age Ageing. 2014 Jan;43(1):2-7
pubmed: 24334750
Healthcare (Basel). 2021 Nov 19;9(11):
pubmed: 34828634
Hosp Health Serv Adm. 1989 Winter;34(4):525-46
pubmed: 10295896

Auteurs

Pei-Chun Tai (PC)

Department of Quality Center, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan 70403, Taiwan.

Shofang Chang (S)

Department of Hospital and Health Care Administration, Chia-Nan University of Pharmacy & Science, Tainan 71710, Taiwan.

Classifications MeSH