Clinical and Dermoscopic Findings of Nevi after Photoepilation: A Review.
IPL
changes
dermoscopy
hair removal
laser
melanocytic
nevi
Journal
Life (Basel, Switzerland)
ISSN: 2075-1729
Titre abrégé: Life (Basel)
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101580444
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
29 Aug 2023
29 Aug 2023
Historique:
received:
27
06
2023
revised:
21
08
2023
accepted:
28
08
2023
medline:
28
9
2023
pubmed:
28
9
2023
entrez:
28
9
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Atypical clinical and dermoscopic findings, or changes in pigmented melanocytic lesions located on body areas treated with lasers or intense pulsed light (IPL) for hair removal (photoepilation), have been described in the literature. There are three prospective studies in a total of 79 individuals with 287 melanocytic nevi and several case reports reporting the dermoscopic findings and changes after photoepilation. Clinical changes have been reported in 20-100% of individuals, while dermoscopic changes have been observed in 48% to 93% of nevi. More frequent dermoscopic changes included bleaching, the development of pigmented globules, and irregular hyperpigmented areas and regression structures, including gray areas, gray dots/globules, and whitish structureless areas. The diagnostic approach for pigmented lesions with atypical dermoscopic findings and changes after photo-epilation included reflectance confocal microscopy, sequential digital dermoscopy follow-up, and/or excision and histopathology. Challenges pertaining to these diagnostic steps in the context of photoepilation include the detection of findings that may warrant a biopsy to exclude melanoma (ugly duckling, irregular hyperpigmented areas, blue-gray or white areas, and loss of pigment network), the potential persistence of changes at follow-up, and that a histopathologic diagnosis may not be possible due to the distortion of melanocytes or complete regression of the lesion. Furthermore, these diagnostic approaches can be time-consuming, require familiarization of the physician with dermoscopic features, may cause anxiety to the individual, and highlight that avoiding passes of the laser or IPL devices over pigmented lesions is key.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37763236
pii: life13091832
doi: 10.3390/life13091832
pmc: PMC10532922
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Review
Langues
eng
Références
J Am Acad Dermatol. 1997 Jul;37(1):68-74
pubmed: 9216525
Dermatol Clin. 2016 Jul;34(3):353-62
pubmed: 27363893
J Cosmet Dermatol. 2009 Dec;8(4):267-74
pubmed: 19958430
J Am Acad Dermatol. 2017 Nov;77(5):938-945.e4
pubmed: 28864306
N Engl J Med. 2015 Nov 12;373(20):1926-36
pubmed: 26559571
J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2022 Nov;36(11):1927-1936
pubmed: 35857388
Arch Dermatol. 2001 Oct;137(10):1343-50
pubmed: 11594860
JAMA Dermatol. 2018 Apr 1;154(4):414-419
pubmed: 29466542
J Invest Dermatol. 2009 Jan;129(1):131-8
pubmed: 18633444
Lasers Surg Med. 2022 Sep;54(7):970-977
pubmed: 35670253
J Am Acad Dermatol. 2007 Mar;56(3):508-13
pubmed: 17113189
Arch Dermatol. 2003 Mar;139(3):282-8
pubmed: 12622618
J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2020 Oct;34(10):2183-2197
pubmed: 32840022
Int J Dermatol. 2017 May;56(5):579-580
pubmed: 27495268
Eur J Dermatol. 2013 Jan-Feb;23(1):121-3
pubmed: 23400371
Dermatol Clin. 2001 Apr;19(2):259-68, vii
pubmed: 11556235
J Cosmet Laser Ther. 2005 Mar;7(1):33-8
pubmed: 16020215
Am J Clin Dermatol. 2002;3(2):107-15
pubmed: 11893222
J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2015 Jun;29(6):1135-40
pubmed: 25303304
Cancers (Basel). 2023 Jan 30;15(3):
pubmed: 36765817
Int J Dermatol. 2016 May;55(5):e307-9
pubmed: 26876612
Int J Hyperthermia. 2013 Sep;29(6):539-43
pubmed: 23786252
Br J Dermatol. 2004 Jan;150(1):64-71
pubmed: 14746618
Am J Dermatopathol. 2001 Oct;23(5):463-9
pubmed: 11801781
J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2019 May;33(5):954-958
pubmed: 30520186
J Cosmet Dermatol. 2022 Feb;21(2):669-673
pubmed: 33834586
Cancer Cell. 2018 Jul 9;34(1):45-55.e4
pubmed: 29990500
J Am Acad Dermatol. 2007 Jul;57(1):96-104
pubmed: 17485141
Dermatol Clin. 2017 Oct;35(4):417-437
pubmed: 28886798
J Cosmet Laser Ther. 2016 Aug;18(4):247-50
pubmed: 26735647
Arch Dermatol. 2010 Apr;146(4):426-8
pubmed: 20404234
JAMA Dermatol. 2017 Apr 1;153(4):279-284
pubmed: 28196213
Dermatol Clin. 2016 Oct;34(4):395-409
pubmed: 27692446
Dermatol Pract Concept. 2015 Apr 30;5(2):99-103
pubmed: 26114064
Dermatology. 2012;224(3):193-7
pubmed: 22571959
Br J Dermatol. 2014 Nov;171(5):1044-51
pubmed: 24891083
Br J Dermatol. 2010 Aug;163(2):302-9
pubmed: 20426776
J Am Acad Dermatol. 2015 Apr;72(4):717-23
pubmed: 25698455
Int J Dermatol. 2001 Aug;40(8):500-4
pubmed: 11703520
J Am Acad Dermatol. 2003 May;48(5):679-93
pubmed: 12734496
Int J Dermatol. 2023 Aug;62(8):1040-1049
pubmed: 37208996
J Am Acad Dermatol. 2011 Jun;64(6):1068-73
pubmed: 21440329
Arch Dermatol. 2005 Aug;141(8):1032-4
pubmed: 16103334
J Cosmet Laser Ther. 2013 Apr;15(2):98-101
pubmed: 23383859
J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2006 Jan;20(1):9-20
pubmed: 16405602
Arch Dermatol. 1998 Jan;134(1):103-4
pubmed: 9449921
J Am Acad Dermatol. 2004 May;50(5):683-9
pubmed: 15097950