Evaluation of a Scintillating Plastic Optical Fiber Device for Measuring kV-Cone Beam Computed Tomography Dose.
CBCT
IGRT
optical fiber
scintillating dosimetry
Journal
Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)
ISSN: 1424-8220
Titre abrégé: Sensors (Basel)
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101204366
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
09 Sep 2023
09 Sep 2023
Historique:
received:
24
07
2023
revised:
01
09
2023
accepted:
07
09
2023
medline:
29
9
2023
pubmed:
28
9
2023
entrez:
28
9
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Justification of imaging procedures such as cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) in radiotherapy makes no doubt. However, the CBCT composite dose is rarely reported or optimized, even though the repeated CBCT cumulative dose can be up to 3% of the prescription dose. This study aimed to evaluate the performance and utility of a new plastic scintillating optical fiber dosimeter for CBCT dosimetric quality assurance (QA) applications before a potential application in patient composite CBCT dosimetry. The dosimeter, made of 1 mm diameter plastic fiber, was installed under a linear accelerator treatment table and linked to photodetectors. The fiber impact on the fluence and dose delivered was respectively assessed with an electronic portal imaging device (EPID) and EBT3 Gafchromic The maximum impact of the fiber on the fluence measured by the EPID was -1.2% for the 6 MV flattening filter-free beam. However, the fiber did not alter the film dose profile when measured for all the beams tested. The fiber was not visible at energies ≥ 80 kV and was merely visible on the CBCT images. When the rate of images per second or mA was changed, the maximum relative difference between the device and the ionization chamber CTDIs was <5%. Changing collimation led to a -7.2% maximum relative difference with an absolute dose difference that was insignificant (-0.3 mGy). Changing kV was associated with a -8.7% maximum relative difference, as published in the literature. The dosimeter may be a promising device for CBCT recurrent dosimetry quality control or dose optimization. According to these results, further developments are in progress in order to adapt the solution to the measurement of patient composite CBCT doses.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Justification of imaging procedures such as cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) in radiotherapy makes no doubt. However, the CBCT composite dose is rarely reported or optimized, even though the repeated CBCT cumulative dose can be up to 3% of the prescription dose. This study aimed to evaluate the performance and utility of a new plastic scintillating optical fiber dosimeter for CBCT dosimetric quality assurance (QA) applications before a potential application in patient composite CBCT dosimetry.
METHODS
METHODS
The dosimeter, made of 1 mm diameter plastic fiber, was installed under a linear accelerator treatment table and linked to photodetectors. The fiber impact on the fluence and dose delivered was respectively assessed with an electronic portal imaging device (EPID) and EBT3 Gafchromic
RESULTS
RESULTS
The maximum impact of the fiber on the fluence measured by the EPID was -1.2% for the 6 MV flattening filter-free beam. However, the fiber did not alter the film dose profile when measured for all the beams tested. The fiber was not visible at energies ≥ 80 kV and was merely visible on the CBCT images. When the rate of images per second or mA was changed, the maximum relative difference between the device and the ionization chamber CTDIs was <5%. Changing collimation led to a -7.2% maximum relative difference with an absolute dose difference that was insignificant (-0.3 mGy). Changing kV was associated with a -8.7% maximum relative difference, as published in the literature.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
The dosimeter may be a promising device for CBCT recurrent dosimetry quality control or dose optimization. According to these results, further developments are in progress in order to adapt the solution to the measurement of patient composite CBCT doses.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37765835
pii: s23187778
doi: 10.3390/s23187778
pmc: PMC10536616
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Références
Radiat Oncol. 2015 Oct 27;10:217
pubmed: 26508131
Radiat Environ Biophys. 2022 Nov;61(4):485-504
pubmed: 36001144
Australas Phys Eng Sci Med. 2014 Dec;37(4):779-89
pubmed: 25245234
Phys Med. 2018 Jan;45:25-34
pubmed: 29472087
Z Med Phys. 2018 Dec;28(4):276-285
pubmed: 29426589
Phys Med. 2021 Oct;90:53-65
pubmed: 34562809
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2014 Jul 08;15(4):4658
pubmed: 25207398
Health Phys. 2013 May;104(5):499-503
pubmed: 23532078
Nat Methods. 2012 Jul;9(7):671-5
pubmed: 22930834
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2009 Feb 1;73(2):610-7
pubmed: 19147025
Sensors (Basel). 2021 Dec 23;22(1):
pubmed: 35009632
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2011 Apr 1;79(5):1557-64
pubmed: 20933341
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2016 Jul 08;17(4):132-145
pubmed: 27455487
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2005 Oct 1;63(2):422-33
pubmed: 16168835
Med Phys. 2017 Oct;44(10):e391-e429
pubmed: 28688159
Med Phys. 2006 Jun;33(6):1573-82
pubmed: 16872065
Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2008;132(3):339-45
pubmed: 19074786
Radiother Oncol. 2008 Sep;88(3):289-309
pubmed: 18706727
Med Phys. 2013 Jun;40(6):062102
pubmed: 23718600
Sensors (Basel). 2023 Feb 27;23(5):
pubmed: 36904817
Br J Radiol. 2007 Jun;80(954):476-82
pubmed: 17684077
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2012 May 1;83(1):419-26
pubmed: 22027261
Health Phys. 2010 May;98(5):683-91
pubmed: 20386198