Is Sliding Compression Necessary for Intramedullary Nailing Fixation of AO/OTA Type A3.3 Intertrochanteric Fracture?
InterTAN
Lateral wall reconstruction
PFNA
Type A3.3 intertrochanteric fracture
Journal
Orthopaedic surgery
ISSN: 1757-7861
Titre abrégé: Orthop Surg
Pays: Australia
ID NLM: 101501666
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Nov 2023
Nov 2023
Historique:
revised:
02
08
2023
received:
26
01
2023
accepted:
07
08
2023
medline:
6
11
2023
pubmed:
28
9
2023
entrez:
28
9
2023
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The intramedullary nail is considered the gold standard for treating AO/OTA type A3.3 intertrochanteric fractures. However, it still faces a significant rate of failure, mainly due to the critical factor of comminuted lateral wall defects leading to inadequate proximal sliding compression. The primary objective of this study is to investigate the requirement of sliding compression in the treatment of unstable AO/OTA type A3.3 intertrochanteric fractures. To achieve this, we conduct a comparative analysis between two approaches: InterTAN alone and proximal femoral anti-rotation blade nailing (PFNA) combined with lateral wall reconstruction for treating AO/OTA type A3.3 intertrochanteric fractures with lateral wall damage. A retrospective analysis was conducted on the clinical data of patients who underwent intramedullary nailing fixation for AO/OTA type A3.3 intertrochanteric fractures at our hospital from January 2012 to January 2022. Patient characteristics as well as treatment details, including operative time, intraoperative blood loss, weight-bearing time, fracture healing time, tip apex distance (TAD) loss, Harris hip scores (HHS), Parker-Palmer mobility score (PPMS), and postoperative complications, were collected and analyzed. Continuous variables were analyzed using independent sample t-tests, while categorical variables were examined using the chi-square test. For group comparisons, variance analysis was applied, and pairwise comparisons were conducted using the LSD-t test. These patients were divided into PFNA combined with lateral wall reconstruction group (sliding compression group) and InterTAN fixation group (static fixation group) based on surgical methods. The operation time, intraoperative bleeding loss, HHS at 12 months and PPMS at 12 months in the sliding compression group were significantly higher than those in the static fixation group, and time to weight-bearing and fracture healing time were significantly lower than those in the static fixation group (p < 0.05). There were no significant differences between two groups in terms of the TAD at 2 days, 2, and 12 months postoperatively, the incidence of complications (p > 0.05). At 6 months postoperatively, femoral neck length was shortened compared to 2 days postoperatively in both groups, and the sliding compression group had a significantly greater degree of femoral neck shortening than the static fixation group (p < 0.05). The use of PFNA with lateral wall reconstruction for A3.3 intertrochanteric fractures demonstrated superior mobility, efficiency, and reduced internal fixation failure rates compared to InterTAN. These findings suggest that sliding compression may be required for intramedullary nailing treatment.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37767609
doi: 10.1111/os.13875
pmc: PMC10622258
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
2805-2813Subventions
Organisme : Military Youth Medical Science and Technology Cultivation Project
ID : 19QNP046
Organisme : the Military Logistics Research Project
ID : CNJ16C013
Organisme : Zhangzhou Natural Science Foundation Projects
ID : ZZ2021J45
Informations de copyright
© 2023 The Authors. Orthopaedic Surgery published by Tianjin Hospital and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.
Références
Injury. 2016 Nov;47(11):2501-2506
pubmed: 27616004
Injury. 2017 Aug;48(8):1837-1842
pubmed: 28651782
Biomed Res Int. 2021 Feb 8;2021:8875370
pubmed: 33628823
Zhongguo Gu Shang. 2017 Jul 25;30(7):597-601
pubmed: 29424146
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1996 Sep;78(9):1447; author reply 1447-8
pubmed: 8816667
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2019 Oct 15;33(10):1223-1227
pubmed: 31544429
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2020 Oct;46(5):947-953
pubmed: 31673714
J Orthop Surg Res. 2018 Mar 2;13(1):46
pubmed: 29499715
Int Orthop. 2021 Nov;45(11):2955-2962
pubmed: 33733284
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2021 Oct;107(6):103009
pubmed: 34217868
Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc. 2015;49(4):426-32
pubmed: 26312472
Int Orthop. 2010 Oct;34(7):1041-7
pubmed: 19882156
Turk J Med Sci. 2019 Nov 19;50(1):117-125
pubmed: 31742370
J Orthop Trauma. 2007 Nov-Dec;21(10 Suppl):S1-133
pubmed: 18277234
Instr Course Lect. 2005;54:409-15
pubmed: 15948470
Injury. 2021 Jun;52 Suppl 2:S3-S11
pubmed: 33221036
J Orthop Surg Res. 2017 Dec 28;12(1):197
pubmed: 29282138
Zhongguo Gu Shang. 2018 May 25;31(5):395-399
pubmed: 29890796
Bull NYU Hosp Jt Dis. 2008;66(4):276-9
pubmed: 19093903
J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2018 Oct-Dec;9(4):317-321
pubmed: 30449978
Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2022 Jul 31;2022:5020960
pubmed: 35958926
Zhongguo Gu Shang. 2018 Sep 25;31(9):840-845
pubmed: 30332878
J Orthop Surg Res. 2016 Jan 15;11:10
pubmed: 26768702
Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2016;17(4):473-88
pubmed: 26605922
Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin. 2022 Apr;25(5):512-520
pubmed: 34378469
Injury. 2014 Jun;45(6):1006-10
pubmed: 24731692
Orthop Clin North Am. 2020 Apr;51(2):189-205
pubmed: 32138857
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2013 Aug;75(2):304-10
pubmed: 23887564
J Orthop Trauma. 2009 Jul;23(6):471-8
pubmed: 19550237