Developing an Electroencephalography-Based Model for Predicting Response to Antidepressant Medication.
Journal
JAMA network open
ISSN: 2574-3805
Titre abrégé: JAMA Netw Open
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101729235
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
05 Sep 2023
05 Sep 2023
Historique:
medline:
28
9
2023
pubmed:
28
9
2023
entrez:
28
9
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Untreated depression is a growing public health concern, with patients often facing a prolonged trial-and-error process in search of effective treatment. Developing a predictive model for treatment response in clinical practice remains challenging. To establish a model based on electroencephalography (EEG) to predict response to 2 distinct selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) medications. This prognostic study developed a predictive model using EEG data collected between 2011 and 2017 from 2 independent cohorts of participants with depression: 1 from the first Canadian Biomarker Integration Network in Depression (CAN-BIND) group and the other from the Establishing Moderators and Biosignatures of Antidepressant Response for Clinical Care (EMBARC) consortium. Eligible participants included those aged 18 to 65 years who had a diagnosis of major depressive disorder. Data were analyzed from January to December 2022. In an open-label trial, CAN-BIND participants received an 8-week treatment regimen of escitalopram treatment (10-20 mg), and EMBARC participants were randomized in a double-blind trial to receive an 8-week sertraline (50-200 mg) treatment or placebo treatment. The model's performance was estimated using balanced accuracy, specificity, and sensitivity metrics. The model used data from the CAN-BIND cohort for internal validation, and data from the treatment group of the EMBARC cohort for external validation. At week 8, response to treatment was defined as a 50% or greater reduction in the primary, clinician-rated scale of depression severity. The CAN-BIND cohort included 125 participants (mean [SD] age, 36.4 [13.0] years; 78 [62.4%] women), and the EMBARC sertraline treatment group included 105 participants (mean [SD] age, 38.4 [13.8] years; 72 [68.6%] women). The model achieved a balanced accuracy of 64.2% (95% CI, 55.8%-72.6%), sensitivity of 66.1% (95% CI, 53.7%-78.5%), and specificity of 62.3% (95% CI, 50.1%-73.8%) during internal validation with CAN-BIND. During external validation with EMBARC, the model achieved a balanced accuracy of 63.7% (95% CI, 54.5%-72.8%), sensitivity of 58.8% (95% CI, 45.3%-72.3%), and specificity of 68.5% (95% CI, 56.1%-80.9%). Additionally, the balanced accuracy for the EMBARC placebo group (118 participants) was 48.7% (95% CI, 39.3%-58.0%), the sensitivity was 50.0% (95% CI, 35.2%-64.8%), and the specificity was 47.3% (95% CI, 35.9%-58.7%), suggesting the model's specificity in predicting SSRIs treatment response. In this prognostic study, an EEG-based model was developed and validated in 2 independent cohorts. The model showed promising accuracy in predicting treatment response to 2 distinct SSRIs, suggesting potential applications for personalized depression treatment.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37768659
pii: 2809952
doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.36094
pmc: PMC10539986
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e2336094Références
Brain. 2017 Apr 1;140(4):1011-1025
pubmed: 28335039
Psychol Med. 2015 Jan;45(1):11-27
pubmed: 24569086
Clin Neurophysiol. 2013 Oct;124(10):1975-85
pubmed: 23684127
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Jan 3;3(1):e1918377
pubmed: 31899530
Psychol Med. 2008 Feb;38(2):289-300
pubmed: 17922940
Am J Psychiatry. 2019 Jan 1;176(1):44-56
pubmed: 30278789
J Affect Disord. 2018 Feb;227:542-549
pubmed: 29169123
J Affect Disord. 2002 May;69(1-3):241-9
pubmed: 12103473
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Jun 1;3(6):e206653
pubmed: 32568399
Radiology. 2018 Mar;286(3):800-809
pubmed: 29309734
Clin Neurophysiol. 2009 Jul;120(7):1313-9
pubmed: 19539524
Am J Psychiatry. 2006 Nov;163(11):1905-17
pubmed: 17074942
J Psychopharmacol. 2014 Jun;28(6):587-95
pubmed: 24557661
PLoS One. 2017 Feb 2;12(2):e0171409
pubmed: 28152063
Eur Neuropsychopharmacol. 2009 Nov;19(11):772-7
pubmed: 19574030
Psychol Med. 2022 Aug 25;:1-11
pubmed: 36004538
Neuroimage. 2018 Oct 15;180(Pt A):68-77
pubmed: 28655633
BMC Med. 2015 Jan 06;13:1
pubmed: 25563062
Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys. 2005 Feb;71(2 Pt 1):021906
pubmed: 15783351
Clin Neurophysiol. 2016 Jan;127(1):509-519
pubmed: 26189209
J Clin Psychiatry. 2019 Feb 5;80(2):
pubmed: 30840787
Nat Biotechnol. 2020 Apr;38(4):439-447
pubmed: 32042166
J Psychiatr Res. 2012 Nov;46(11):1483-91
pubmed: 22939462
Pharmacopsychiatry. 2000 Nov;33(6):201-5
pubmed: 11147926
Front Psychiatry. 2019 Jan 14;9:768
pubmed: 30692945
J Affect Disord. 2018 Jan 15;226:326-331
pubmed: 29031182
JAMA. 2013 Nov 27;310(20):2191-4
pubmed: 24141714
PLoS One. 2019 Nov 7;14(11):e0224365
pubmed: 31697686
Psychol Med. 2021 Dec;51(16):2742-2751
pubmed: 35575607
J Affect Disord. 2019 Sep 1;256:132-142
pubmed: 31176185
J Psychiatr Res. 2016 Jul;78:11-23
pubmed: 27038550
Am J Psychiatry. 2006 Jan;163(1):28-40
pubmed: 16390886
Biol Psychiatry. 2008 Jun 15;63(12):1171-7
pubmed: 18061147
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Jun 1;3(6):e207133
pubmed: 32568395
BMC Psychiatry. 2016 Apr 16;16:105
pubmed: 27084692