Crossover of the dimensions of work-family and family-work conflict in couples: Protocol for a qualitative study.
Journal
PloS one
ISSN: 1932-6203
Titre abrégé: PLoS One
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101285081
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2023
2023
Historique:
received:
09
08
2023
accepted:
29
08
2023
medline:
2
10
2023
pubmed:
28
9
2023
entrez:
28
9
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Conflict between work and non-work is a bidirectional and a multidimensional construct that has garnered much attention from researchers and practitioners alike. Previously, studies with a dyadic design demonstrated that interrole conflict can cross over between partners in romantic relationships. The aim of the present study is to explore-from an individual and dyadic perspective-how partners perceive dimensions of interrole conflict (that is: time, strain, behaviour, and possibly others) and whether crossover between partners is dimension-dependent. This protocol outlines a qualitative interview study. Participants (N = 40) will be dual-earner couples that meet two inclusion criteria: both partners need to be professionally active, and the couples need to have lived together for at least a year. Interviews will be conducted separately with each partner. To analyse the data at the individual level we will use reflexive thematic analysis. To analyse the data at the dyadic level we will apply an adapted version of the framework method. We anticipate that findings of this study will have the potential to advance theoretical models depicting crossover processes and, more generally, the interface between work and family lives. Moreover, insights into how couples experience dimension-based interrole conflict will be important for the development of targeted interventions.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37768912
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0290216
pii: PONE-D-23-23831
pmc: PMC10538721
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e0290216Informations de copyright
Copyright: © 2023 Smoktunowicz et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Références
Int J Occup Med Environ Health. 2017 Nov 3;31(2):199-215
pubmed: 28991270
J Med Internet Res. 2016 Jan 27;18(1):e21
pubmed: 26818683
Int J Behav Med. 2018 Feb;25(1):17-29
pubmed: 28730402
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2013 Sep 18;13:117
pubmed: 24047204
Internet Interv. 2023 Apr 11;32:100621
pubmed: 37273936
Front Psychol. 2016 Jul 04;7:1009
pubmed: 27458407
J Appl Psychol. 2001 Jun;86(3):499-512
pubmed: 11419809
Internet Interv. 2018 Apr 06;12:181-188
pubmed: 30135782
Qual Health Res. 2010 Dec;20(12):1642-55
pubmed: 20663940
J Occup Health Psychol. 2011 Apr;16(2):151-69
pubmed: 21280939
Psychiatr Serv. 2014 Jan 1;65(1):24-32
pubmed: 24081188
J Appl Psychol. 2023 Jun 08;:
pubmed: 37289526
J Appl Psychol. 2021 Jan;106(1):15-28
pubmed: 33151705
J Appl Psychol. 2023 Mar;108(3):520-539
pubmed: 36037489
J Appl Psychol. 2017 Dec;102(12):1601-1635
pubmed: 28749157
Acad Med. 2014 Sep;89(9):1245-51
pubmed: 24979285
J Occup Health Psychol. 2010 Jan;15(1):75-90
pubmed: 20063960
Qual Health Res. 2001 Jul;11(4):553-67
pubmed: 11521611
Qual Health Res. 2013 Sep;23(9):1276-84
pubmed: 23925406
Qual Health Res. 2018 Apr;28(5):844-854
pubmed: 29303049
Qual Health Res. 2021 Jul;31(8):1555-1564
pubmed: 33980102
Qual Health Res. 2016 Nov;26(13):1753-1760
pubmed: 26613970
Internet Interv. 2020 Jun 02;21:100331
pubmed: 32577404
J Appl Psychol. 2015 Mar;100(2):522-36
pubmed: 25285385
Qual Health Res. 2013 Oct;23(10):1399-407
pubmed: 24062417
Clin Psychol Rev. 2018 Jul;63:80-92
pubmed: 29940401