Photoinactivation vs repair of photosystem II as target of thermal stress in epipelic and epipsammic microphytobenthos communities.


Journal

PloS one
ISSN: 1932-6203
Titre abrégé: PLoS One
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101285081

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2023
Historique:
received: 12 07 2023
accepted: 14 09 2023
medline: 2 10 2023
pubmed: 28 9 2023
entrez: 28 9 2023
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Microphytobenthos (MPB) inhabiting intertidal flats are exposed to large and sudden changes in temperature, often simultaneously with exposure to direct sunlight. These conditions are expected to negatively impact photosynthesis by exacerbating the photoinhibition under high light. This study addressed the photoinhibitory effects of short-term exposure to cold (5°C) and moderate heat (35°C) on MPB dominated by motile epipelic (EPL) and immotile epipsammic (EPM) diatom species, by evaluating the seasonal variation of photoinactivation and repair of photosystem II (PSII). The susceptibility to PSII photoinactivation and the counteracting repair capacity were measured by the constant rates kPI and kREC, respectively. The photoacclimation state was characterized by hysteresis light-response curves (HLC) of the relative electron transport rate, rETR, and of the nonphotochemical quenching index Y(NPQ). Under non-stress conditions (20°C), kREC was on average almost 10x higher than the corresponding kPI (20.4 vs 2.70 × 10-4 s-1, respectively), indicating the operation of efficient repair mechanisms. Overall, the exposure to low and high temperatures affected both PSII photoinactivation and repair but causing smaller impacts in the former than in the latter. Also, cold stress caused larger effects on repair (decrease of kREC) than on photoinactivation (increase of kPI), but heat stress affected similarly the two processes. These effects varied seasonally, suggesting a role of thermal acclimation, as heat stress had stronger effects in cold-acclimated samples and cold stress resulted in stronger effects in heat-acclimated samples. The changes in kPI and kREC occurred despite the high light-acclimated phenotype found all year round, indicating that these processes vary independently from the photoacclimation state. The results also showed that photoprotection processes, as measured by energy-dependent non-photochemical index qE, appear to have an important role, both by preventing PSII photoinactivation and by alleviating the impacts on PSII repair under acute thermal stress.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37768956
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0292211
pii: PONE-D-23-21782
pmc: PMC10538756
doi:

Substances chimiques

Photosystem II Protein Complex 0
Chlorophyll 1406-65-1

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

e0292211

Informations de copyright

Copyright: © 2023 Bártolo et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Références

J Phycol. 2013 Apr;49(2):258-70
pubmed: 27008515
Biochim Biophys Acta. 1956 Aug;21(2):234-44
pubmed: 13363902
Int Rev Cell Mol Biol. 2013;300:243-303
pubmed: 23273864
J Theor Biol. 2002 Feb 21;214(4):519-27
pubmed: 11851364
Biochim Biophys Acta. 2012 Aug;1817(8):1127-33
pubmed: 22387427
Plant Physiol. 2012 Sep;160(1):464-76
pubmed: 22829321
Photosynth Res. 2006 Oct;90(1):29-43
pubmed: 17111236
Physiol Plant. 2011 May;142(1):87-104
pubmed: 21382037
Biochim Biophys Acta. 2004 Jun 28;1657(1):23-32
pubmed: 15238209
Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2014 Nov;98(21):8777-96
pubmed: 25139449
J Exp Bot. 2017 Feb 1;68(5):1123-1135
pubmed: 28069780
PeerJ. 2018 Sep 4;6:e5589
pubmed: 30202661
Environ Microbiol. 2015 Oct;17(10):3662-77
pubmed: 25471657
J Phycol. 2008 Jun;44(3):670-83
pubmed: 27041425
ISME J. 2015 Jan;9(1):32-45
pubmed: 25003964
Photosynth Res. 2017 Feb;131(2):203-220
pubmed: 27639727
Plant Cell Physiol. 2003 Mar;44(3):318-25
pubmed: 12668778
Photosynth Res. 2022 Oct;154(1):57-74
pubmed: 36057004
J Theor Biol. 2021 Mar 21;513:110580
pubmed: 33444625
Photosynth Res. 2011 May;108(1):61-76
pubmed: 21516348
FEBS Lett. 2013 Nov 1;587(21):3372-81
pubmed: 24056074
Physiol Plant. 2017 Sep;161(1):97-108
pubmed: 28370227
Biochim Biophys Acta. 2012 Jan;1817(1):258-65
pubmed: 21565161
Trends Plant Sci. 2008 Apr;13(4):178-82
pubmed: 18328775
Photosynth Res. 2013 Dec;118(3):219-29
pubmed: 24062202

Auteurs

Cláudia Bártolo (C)

CESAM - Centre for Environmental and Marine Studies and Department of Biology, University of Aveiro, Aveiro, Portugal.

Silja Frankenbach (S)

CESAM - Centre for Environmental and Marine Studies and Department of Biology, University of Aveiro, Aveiro, Portugal.

João Serôdio (J)

CESAM - Centre for Environmental and Marine Studies and Department of Biology, University of Aveiro, Aveiro, Portugal.

Articles similaires

Photosynthesis Ribulose-Bisphosphate Carboxylase Carbon Dioxide Molecular Dynamics Simulation Cyanobacteria
Semiconductors Photosynthesis Polymers Carbon Dioxide Bacteria
Fragaria Light Plant Leaves Osmosis Stress, Physiological

Classifications MeSH