A useful modality of CT angiography image to identify medical emergency in isolated celiac artery dissection type I: A case report with longest follow-up and literature review.
CT angiography
Celiac artery dissection
Symptomatic isolated CAD
Type I SICAD
multiplanar reconstruction
Journal
Radiology case reports
ISSN: 1930-0433
Titre abrégé: Radiol Case Rep
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 101467888
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Dec 2023
Dec 2023
Historique:
received:
17
08
2023
revised:
28
08
2023
accepted:
01
09
2023
medline:
29
9
2023
pubmed:
29
9
2023
entrez:
29
9
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Symptomatic isolated celiac artery (CA) dissection (SICAD) is an extremely rare form of visceral artery dissection. It is diagnosed by a contrast abdominal computed tomography (CT) scan showing a CA dissection (CAD). There are 4 types of CAD: Type I-IV. Type I has entry and re-entry and no true luminal narrowing. All types other than type I have entry and re-entry. They have true lumen compression and true lumen constriction due to false lumen. We report a case with the longest follow-up, 120 months after symptom onset, without evidence of CAD exacerbation. A 56-year-old man presented with a sudden onset of abdominal and back pain. He had a past medical history of left pneumothorax, pulmonary tuberculosis at the age of 23, and hypertension on medication since the age of 46. On physical examination, he had mild muscle rebound tenderness in the epigastric region. The curved multiplanar reconstruction (MPR) of the urgent 3-dimensional contrast-enhanced abdominal computed tomography angiography (CTA) showed an isolated celiac artery dissection type I. Given the risk of emergency surgery for total occlusion of the CA, conservative management with analgesics during hospitalization resolved the abdominal pain, and the patient was discharged 3 days later. Subsequently, a total of 5 CTAs were performed over 120 months, but no worsening of CA arterial dissection and CA occlusion findings were observed. In type I SICAD cases, arterial dissection, and CA occlusion may progress, in which case emergency stenting or endovascular treatment may be indicated, and close follow-up such as CTA is required.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37771382
doi: 10.1016/j.radcr.2023.09.004
pii: S1930-0433(23)00648-9
pmc: PMC10522870
doi:
Types de publication
Case Reports
Langues
eng
Pagination
4294-4298Informations de copyright
© 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of University of Washington.
Références
Gastroenterology Res. 2018 Oct;11(5):379-382
pubmed: 30344811
Circ J. 2016 May 25;80(6):1445-51
pubmed: 27074825
Medicine (Baltimore). 2018 Feb;97(5):e9705
pubmed: 29384849
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2020 Feb;59(2):247-253
pubmed: 31813666
J Vasc Surg. 2018 Oct;68(4):1228-1240.e9
pubmed: 30126785
J Vasc Surg. 2011 Jun;53(6):1714-5
pubmed: 21498024
Int J Surg. 2023 Mar 01;109(3):469-480
pubmed: 36912770
Insights Imaging. 2020 Oct 15;11(1):112
pubmed: 33057847
Radiol Case Rep. 2022 Apr 12;17(6):2085-2091
pubmed: 35464790
Front Surg. 2022 Oct 21;9:972276
pubmed: 36338634