The impact of healthcare systems on the clinical diagnosis and disease-modifying treatment usage in relapse-onset multiple sclerosis: a real-world perspective in five registries across Europe.
big data
clinical audit
decision tree
disease registers
international collaboration
multiple sclerosis
Journal
Therapeutic advances in neurological disorders
ISSN: 1756-2856
Titre abrégé: Ther Adv Neurol Disord
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101480242
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2023
2023
Historique:
received:
02
08
2023
accepted:
16
08
2023
medline:
29
9
2023
pubmed:
29
9
2023
entrez:
29
9
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Prescribing guidance for disease-modifying treatment (DMT) in multiple sclerosis (MS) is centred on a clinical diagnosis of relapsing-remitting MS (RRMS). DMT prescription guidelines and monitoring vary across countries. Standardising the approach to diagnosis of disease course, for example, assigning RRMS or secondary progressive MS (SPMS) diagnoses, allows examination of the impact of health system characteristics on the stated clinical diagnosis and treatment access. We analysed registry data from six cohorts in five countries (Czech Republic, Denmark, Germany, Sweden and United Kingdom) on patients with an initial diagnosis of RRMS. We standardised our approach utilising a pre-existing algorithm (DecisionTree, DT) to determine patient diagnoses of RRMS or secondary progressive MS (SPMS). We identified five global drivers of DMT prescribing: Provision, Availability, Funding, Monitoring and Audit, data were analysed against these concepts using meta-analysis and univariate meta-regression. In 64,235 patients, we found variations in DMT use between countries, with higher usage in RRMS and lower usage in SPMS, with correspondingly lower usage in the UK compared to other registers. Factors such as female gender ( This highlights the importance of a healthcare system's approach to verifying the clinical label of MS course in facilitating appropriate prescribing, with some flexibility allowed in uncertain cases to ensure continued access to treatment.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37771841
doi: 10.1177/17562864231198963
pii: 10.1177_17562864231198963
pmc: PMC10524069
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
17562864231198963Informations de copyright
© The Author(s), 2023.
Références
Mult Scler J Exp Transl Clin. 2023 Feb 16;9(1):20552173231153557
pubmed: 36816812
Heart. 2009 Jan;95(1):20-6
pubmed: 18463200
JAMA Neurol. 2021 Oct 1;78(10):1197-1204
pubmed: 34398221
Nat Rev Nephrol. 2018 Mar;14(3):151-164
pubmed: 29355169
BMJ. 2016 Apr 27;352:i1981
pubmed: 27121591
Crit Care Med. 2022 Jun 1;50(6):913-923
pubmed: 35148525
Mult Scler Relat Disord. 2021 May;50:102813
pubmed: 33578207
Mult Scler. 2018 Feb;24(2):96-120
pubmed: 29353550
Brain. 2016 Sep;139(Pt 9):2395-405
pubmed: 27401521
Mult Scler. 2017 Jul;23(8):1123-1136
pubmed: 28273775
Int J MS Care. 2016 Sep-Oct;18(5):257-264
pubmed: 27803641
Mult Scler. 2019 Apr;25(5):740-749
pubmed: 29663869
Sci Rep. 2021 Jun 25;11(1):13340
pubmed: 34172792
Mult Scler. 2014 Oct;20(12):1654-7
pubmed: 24493475
Mult Scler. 2021 Jul;27(8):1240-1249
pubmed: 33263261
Mult Scler Relat Disord. 2018 Aug;24:3-10
pubmed: 29860199
Neurology. 2022 May 3;98(18):e1810-e1817
pubmed: 35418457
Pract Neurol. 2015 Aug;15(4):273-9
pubmed: 26101071