Synaptic input and temperature influence sensory coding in a mechanoreceptor.

action potential dendritic integration leech neuronal compartmentalization spike initiation zone spike latency temperature touch cell

Journal

Frontiers in cellular neuroscience
ISSN: 1662-5102
Titre abrégé: Front Cell Neurosci
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101477935

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2023
Historique:
received: 02 06 2023
accepted: 22 08 2023
medline: 29 9 2023
pubmed: 29 9 2023
entrez: 29 9 2023
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Many neurons possess more than one spike initiation zone (SIZ), which adds to their computational power and functional flexibility. Integrating inputs from different origins is especially relevant for sensory neurons that rely on relative spike timing for encoding sensory information. Yet, it is poorly understood if and how the propagation of spikes generated at one SIZ in response to sensory stimulation is affected by synaptic inputs triggering activity of other SIZ, and by environmental factors like temperature. The mechanosensory Touch (T) cell in the medicinal leech is an ideal model system to study these potential interactions because it allows intracellular recording and stimulation of its soma while simultaneously touching the skin in a body-wall preparation. The T cell reliably elicits spikes in response to somatic depolarization, as well as to tactile skin stimulation. Latencies of spikes elicited in the skin vary across cells, depending on the touch location relative to the cell's receptive field. However, repetitive stimulation reveals that tactilely elicited spikes are more precisely timed than spikes triggered by somatic current injection. When the soma is hyperpolarized to mimic inhibitory synaptic input, first spike latencies of tactilely induced spikes increase. If spikes from both SIZ follow shortly after each other, the arrival time of the second spike at the soma can be delayed. Although the latency of spikes increases by the same factor when the temperature decreases, the effect is considerably stronger for the longer absolute latencies of spikes propagating from the skin to the soma. We therefore conclude that the propagation time of spikes from the skin is modulated by internal factors like synaptic inputs, and by external factors like temperature. Moreover, fewer spikes are detected when spikes from both origins are expected to arrive at the soma in temporal proximity. Hence, the leech T cell might be a key for understanding how the interaction of multiple SIZ impacts temporal and rate coding of sensory information, and how cold-blooded animals can produce adequate behavioral responses to sensory stimuli based on temperature-dependent relative spike timing.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37771930
doi: 10.3389/fncel.2023.1233730
pmc: PMC10522859
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

1233730

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2023 Scherer, Sandbote, Schultze and Kretzberg.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Références

J Physiol. 1949 Aug;109(1-2):240-9
pubmed: 15394322
Front Physiol. 2016 Oct 28;7:506
pubmed: 27840612
J Neurosci. 2006 Jul 26;26(30):8009-16
pubmed: 16870746
J Neurosci. 2020 Feb 26;40(9):1888-1896
pubmed: 31980584
Front Physiol. 2018 Mar 07;9:173
pubmed: 29563881
J Neurosci. 1989 Aug;9(8):2846-57
pubmed: 2769368
Neuroscience. 2022 May 1;489:15-33
pubmed: 35182699
J Physiol. 1981 Feb;311:565-83
pubmed: 6267257
J Neurosci. 1996 Jul 15;16(14):4335-43
pubmed: 8699244
J Neurophysiol. 2001 Sep;86(3):1226-36
pubmed: 11535672
J Neurosci. 2021 Dec 15;41(50):10213-10221
pubmed: 34753741
Front Cell Neurosci. 2022 Apr 27;16:858221
pubmed: 35573827
Nat Neurosci. 2015 Dec;18(12):1713-21
pubmed: 26605882
J Physiol. 2008 Apr 1;586(7):1849-57
pubmed: 18258662
J Neurophysiol. 1979 Mar;42(2):569-81
pubmed: 217975
J Neurosci. 2003 Apr 1;23(7):2920-31
pubmed: 12684479
J Neurophysiol. 1968 Sep;31(5):740-56
pubmed: 5711143
Neuron. 2019 May 22;102(4):801-812.e5
pubmed: 30926280
Brain. 2022 Jun 3;145(5):1632-1640
pubmed: 35661858
Neuroscience. 2022 May 1;489:185-199
pubmed: 34116137
Comp Biochem Physiol C Comp Pharmacol Toxicol. 1991;99(3):369-74
pubmed: 1685409
Neuron. 1998 Nov;21(5):1189-200
pubmed: 9856473
J Neurosci. 2016 Jun 22;36(25):6718-31
pubmed: 27335403
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1979 Feb;76(2):986-90
pubmed: 284423
J Neurophysiol. 1971 Jul;34(4):532-51
pubmed: 4329778
J Neurophysiol. 1980 Nov;44(5):878-96
pubmed: 6255110
J Neurosci. 2008 Dec 31;28(53):14329-40
pubmed: 19118165
Front Cell Neurosci. 2020 Jan 22;13:570
pubmed: 32038171
Neurosci Lett. 1979 Aug;13(3):231-6
pubmed: 530474
Brain Res. 1977 Dec 16;138(2):347-52
pubmed: 201348
Sci Rep. 2018 Feb 14;8(1):3046
pubmed: 29445203
J Gen Physiol. 1963 Jan;46:533-49
pubmed: 13993486
J Exp Biol. 1991 Jan;155:261-73
pubmed: 1849955
Nat Neurosci. 2008 Feb;11(2):178-86
pubmed: 18204443
J Neurosci. 2016 Mar 30;36(13):3636-47
pubmed: 27030751
J Neurosci. 2011 Nov 9;31(45):16049-55
pubmed: 22072655
J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol. 2003 Jan;189(1):59-67
pubmed: 12548431
J Physiol Paris. 1999 Sep-Oct;93(4):319-27
pubmed: 10574121
Neuron. 2019 May 22;102(4):709-711
pubmed: 31121119
Front Cell Neurosci. 2023 Jul 25;17:1186997
pubmed: 37565030
J Exp Biol. 2015 Nov;218(Pt 21):3353-9
pubmed: 26538172
J Neurophysiol. 2007 Jan;97(1):746-60
pubmed: 17093120
J Physiol. 1982 May;326:251-60
pubmed: 7108790
J Neurophysiol. 2015 Sep;114(3):1424-37
pubmed: 26041833
J Neurosci. 1996 Apr 15;16(8):2585-91
pubmed: 8786434
J Vis Exp. 2013 Nov 04;(81):e50631
pubmed: 24299987
J Physiol. 1976 Dec;263(3):513-38
pubmed: 1018277
J Physiol. 1973 May;230(3):509-34
pubmed: 4717151
Front Cell Neurosci. 2019 Oct 23;13:477
pubmed: 31708748
eNeuro. 2018 Sep 11;5(4):
pubmed: 30225349
Invert Neurosci. 2009 Mar;9(1):1-10
pubmed: 19142677
J Physiol. 1981 Nov;320:219-28
pubmed: 7320936
J Physiol. 2001 Jun 1;533(Pt 2):447-66
pubmed: 11389204
Brain Res. 1975 Oct 10;96(1):93-8
pubmed: 1175010
Nature. 2010 Jun 24;465(7301):1075-8
pubmed: 20543825
Front Cell Neurosci. 2016 Oct 25;10:250
pubmed: 27826229
J Neurosci. 1992 Jul;12(7):2803-12
pubmed: 1613558
Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2012 Aug;22(4):724-34
pubmed: 22326854
J Neurophysiol. 2005 Jun;93(6):3560-72
pubmed: 15689387
PLoS Comput Biol. 2015 May 15;11(5):e1004189
pubmed: 25978332
J Comput Neurosci. 2005 Jan-Feb;18(1):5-24
pubmed: 15789166
J Therm Biol. 2017 Apr;65:1-7
pubmed: 28343561
J Physiol. 1969 Aug;203(3):591-609
pubmed: 4319015
J Physiol. 2000 Dec 15;529 Pt 3:747-62
pubmed: 11118503

Auteurs

Jens-Steffen Scherer (JS)

Department of Neuroscience, Computational Neuroscience, Faculty VI, University of Oldenburg, Oldenburg, Germany.

Kevin Sandbote (K)

Department of Neuroscience, Computational Neuroscience, Faculty VI, University of Oldenburg, Oldenburg, Germany.

Bjarne L Schultze (BL)

Department of Neuroscience, Computational Neuroscience, Faculty VI, University of Oldenburg, Oldenburg, Germany.

Jutta Kretzberg (J)

Department of Neuroscience, Computational Neuroscience, Faculty VI, University of Oldenburg, Oldenburg, Germany.
Department of Neuroscience, Cluster of Excellence Hearing4all, Faculty VI, University of Oldenburg, Oldenburg, Germany.
Research Center Neurosensory Science, University of Oldenburg, Oldenburg, Germany.

Classifications MeSH