Initial results of investigator initiated international database on catheter directed therapy of acute pulmonary embolism.

catheter-directed therapy pulmonary embolism registry

Journal

Cardiology journal
ISSN: 1898-018X
Titre abrégé: Cardiol J
Pays: Poland
ID NLM: 101392712

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
29 Sep 2023
Historique:
received: 11 06 2023
accepted: 21 08 2023
medline: 29 9 2023
pubmed: 29 9 2023
entrez: 29 9 2023
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

Catheter directed therapies (CDT) are widely used in the treatment of acute pulmonary embolism (PE). A multicenter registry was organized to evaluate their application in real life and to determine efficacy and safety of these procedures. Local experience of participating centers in percutaneous techniques for PE treatment was assessed. An internet-based registry was designed to collect clinical, echocardiographic and laboratory data of consecutive PE patients treated with CDT in participating centers between 2017 and 2022. Under analysis were 145 consecutive patients with acute PE, aged 61 ± 15 years, treated with CDT in 7 centers: 50 (34.5%) patients with high-risk PE (HRPE), and 95 (65.5%) patients with intermediate-high risk PE (IHRPE). 100 (69%) patients were treated with dedicated devices, in 45 (31%) subjects a pigtail catheter was used. Total PE or CDT related in-hospital mortality in HRPE reached 14% (7 patients), while in IHRPE 3.2% (3 patients) (p = 0.032). 50% of PE or CDT related deaths occurred in patients treated with a pigtail catheter. All-cause mortality in 145 patients was 9.7%, and it was higher in HRPE than in IHRPE (18% vs. 5.3%, p = 0.019). The use of pigtail catheters compared to dedicated systems was associated with higher mortality (20% vs. 5%, p = 0.01). Catheter directed therapies is a real option of treating PE. It was used as primary therapy also in patients without contraindication for thrombolysis suggesting that clinical practice does not always follow current PE guidelines. Patients treated with dedicated CDT systems had a higher survival rate than subjects treated with pigtail catheters.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Catheter directed therapies (CDT) are widely used in the treatment of acute pulmonary embolism (PE). A multicenter registry was organized to evaluate their application in real life and to determine efficacy and safety of these procedures. Local experience of participating centers in percutaneous techniques for PE treatment was assessed.
METHODS METHODS
An internet-based registry was designed to collect clinical, echocardiographic and laboratory data of consecutive PE patients treated with CDT in participating centers between 2017 and 2022.
RESULTS RESULTS
Under analysis were 145 consecutive patients with acute PE, aged 61 ± 15 years, treated with CDT in 7 centers: 50 (34.5%) patients with high-risk PE (HRPE), and 95 (65.5%) patients with intermediate-high risk PE (IHRPE). 100 (69%) patients were treated with dedicated devices, in 45 (31%) subjects a pigtail catheter was used. Total PE or CDT related in-hospital mortality in HRPE reached 14% (7 patients), while in IHRPE 3.2% (3 patients) (p = 0.032). 50% of PE or CDT related deaths occurred in patients treated with a pigtail catheter. All-cause mortality in 145 patients was 9.7%, and it was higher in HRPE than in IHRPE (18% vs. 5.3%, p = 0.019). The use of pigtail catheters compared to dedicated systems was associated with higher mortality (20% vs. 5%, p = 0.01).
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
Catheter directed therapies is a real option of treating PE. It was used as primary therapy also in patients without contraindication for thrombolysis suggesting that clinical practice does not always follow current PE guidelines. Patients treated with dedicated CDT systems had a higher survival rate than subjects treated with pigtail catheters.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37772352
pii: VM/OJS/J/95949
doi: 10.5603/cj.95949
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Auteurs

Mateusz T Jermakow (MT)

Department of Internal Medicine and Cardiology, Medical University of Warsaw, Poland. m.jermak@gmail.com.

Slobodan Obradovic (S)

Clinic of Cardiology, Military Medical Academy, Belgrade, Serbia.
School of Medicine, University of Defense, Belgrade, Serbia.

Pablo Salinas (P)

Interventional Cardiology, Hospital Clínico San Carlos, Madrid, Spain.
Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria del Hospital Clínico San Carlos, Madrid, Spain.

Marek Roik (M)

Department of Internal Medicine and Cardiology, Medical University of Warsaw, Poland.

Boris Dzudovic (B)

School of Medicine, University of Defense, Belgrade, Serbia.
Clinic of Emergency Medicine, Military Medical Academy, Belgrade, Serbia.

Igor Sekulic (I)

School of Medicine, University of Defense, Belgrade, Serbia.
Institute of Radiology, Military Medical Academy, Belgrade, Serbia.

Fernando Macaya (F)

Interventional Cardiology, Hospital Clínico San Carlos, Madrid, Spain.

Jose Paredes-Vazquez (J)

Interventional Cardiology, Hospital Clínico San Carlos, Madrid, Spain.

Maite Velázquez Martín (M)

Servicio de Cardiología, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre. Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Hospital 12 de Octubre (imas12), CIBERCV, Madrid, Spain.

Nicolás Manuel Maneiro Melón (NM)

Servicio de Cardiología, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre. Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Hospital 12 de Octubre (imas12), CIBERCV, Madrid, Spain.

Djordje Nedeljkov (D)

Institute for Pulmonary Diseases of Vojvodina, Sremska Kamenica, Serbia.

Jovan Matijasevic (J)

Institute for Pulmonary Diseases of Vojvodina, Sremska Kamenica, Serbia.
Faculty of Medicine, University of Novi Sad, Serbia.

Andrzej Łabyk (A)

Department of Internal Medicine and Cardiology, Medical University of Warsaw, Poland.

Marcin Krakowian (M)

Department of Internal Medicine and Cardiology, Medical University of Warsaw, Poland.

Jakub Stępniewski (J)

Pulmonary Circulation Center, Department of Cardiac and Vascular Disease, Jagiellonian University Medical College, John Paul II Hospital, Krakow, Poland.
Department of Medical Education, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Krakow, Poland.

Aleksander Araszkiewicz (A)

1st Department of Cardiology, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Poznan, Poland.

Piotr Pruszczyk (P)

Department of Internal Medicine and Cardiology, Medical University of Warsaw, Poland.

Classifications MeSH